在线反馈的定性分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Eric Olsen, Aman Nihal, Michael Goldenberg, Conway Huang
{"title":"在线反馈的定性分析。","authors":"Eric Olsen, Aman Nihal, Michael Goldenberg, Conway Huang","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online reviews influence patient health care decision-making and perceptions of clinicians. Although Mohs micrographic surgery is a common dermatologic procedure, the nature of negative online reviews for Mohs surgeons remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize negative 1-star Yelp reviews of Mohs surgeons.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 7,031 Yelp reviews for Mohs micrographic surgeons was conducted. One-star reviews specific to Mohs surgeons were included. Each review was coded for clinical and nonclinical complaints. Statistical comparisons were made between surgical and nonsurgical patients, and between cosmetic and noncosmetic patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 670 reviews included, 91.2% were written by patients who did not undergo surgery. Nonclinical complaints (81.2%) were more prevalent than clinical complaints (18.8%). Surgical patients were more likely to report clinical issues such as scarring and pain ( p < .05), while nonsurgical patients were more likely to cite nonclinical issues including staff professionalism and communication. Cosmetic patients more frequently complained about cosmetic outcomes, bedside manners, and billing issues ( p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Negative reviews of Mohs surgeons are primarily driven by nonclinical concerns, especially among nonsurgical patients. These findings highlight the importance of communication and staff interactions in patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predominance of Non-Clinical Complaints in 1-Star Reviews of Mohs Surgeons: A Qualitative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Olsen, Aman Nihal, Michael Goldenberg, Conway Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online reviews influence patient health care decision-making and perceptions of clinicians. Although Mohs micrographic surgery is a common dermatologic procedure, the nature of negative online reviews for Mohs surgeons remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize negative 1-star Yelp reviews of Mohs surgeons.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 7,031 Yelp reviews for Mohs micrographic surgeons was conducted. One-star reviews specific to Mohs surgeons were included. Each review was coded for clinical and nonclinical complaints. Statistical comparisons were made between surgical and nonsurgical patients, and between cosmetic and noncosmetic patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 670 reviews included, 91.2% were written by patients who did not undergo surgery. Nonclinical complaints (81.2%) were more prevalent than clinical complaints (18.8%). Surgical patients were more likely to report clinical issues such as scarring and pain ( p < .05), while nonsurgical patients were more likely to cite nonclinical issues including staff professionalism and communication. Cosmetic patients more frequently complained about cosmetic outcomes, bedside manners, and billing issues ( p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Negative reviews of Mohs surgeons are primarily driven by nonclinical concerns, especially among nonsurgical patients. These findings highlight the importance of communication and staff interactions in patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004830\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004830","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在线评论影响患者的医疗保健决策和临床医生的看法。尽管莫氏显微摄影手术是一种常见的皮肤外科手术,但网上对莫氏外科医生的负面评论的本质仍然知之甚少。目的:分析莫氏外科医生在Yelp上的一星差评。材料与方法:回顾性分析7031篇关于莫氏显微摄影外科医生的Yelp评论。其中包括针对莫氏外科医生的一星评价。每次回顾都对临床和非临床投诉进行编码。对手术与非手术患者、美容与非美容患者进行统计学比较。结果:纳入的670篇综述中,91.2%是由未接受手术的患者撰写的。非临床投诉(81.2%)高于临床投诉(18.8%)。手术患者更有可能报告临床问题,如疤痕和疼痛(p < 0.05),而非手术患者更有可能提到非临床问题,包括工作人员的专业性和沟通。美容患者更频繁地抱怨美容效果、床边态度和账单问题(p < 0.001)。结论:对莫氏外科医生的负面评价主要是由非临床因素引起的,尤其是非手术患者。这些发现强调了沟通和员工互动对患者满意度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predominance of Non-Clinical Complaints in 1-Star Reviews of Mohs Surgeons: A Qualitative Analysis.

Background: Online reviews influence patient health care decision-making and perceptions of clinicians. Although Mohs micrographic surgery is a common dermatologic procedure, the nature of negative online reviews for Mohs surgeons remains poorly understood.

Objective: To characterize negative 1-star Yelp reviews of Mohs surgeons.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 7,031 Yelp reviews for Mohs micrographic surgeons was conducted. One-star reviews specific to Mohs surgeons were included. Each review was coded for clinical and nonclinical complaints. Statistical comparisons were made between surgical and nonsurgical patients, and between cosmetic and noncosmetic patients.

Results: Of 670 reviews included, 91.2% were written by patients who did not undergo surgery. Nonclinical complaints (81.2%) were more prevalent than clinical complaints (18.8%). Surgical patients were more likely to report clinical issues such as scarring and pain ( p < .05), while nonsurgical patients were more likely to cite nonclinical issues including staff professionalism and communication. Cosmetic patients more frequently complained about cosmetic outcomes, bedside manners, and billing issues ( p < .001).

Conclusion: Negative reviews of Mohs surgeons are primarily driven by nonclinical concerns, especially among nonsurgical patients. These findings highlight the importance of communication and staff interactions in patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信