Anna Stubbendorff, Ulrika Ericson, Ylva Bengtsson, Yan Borné, Emily Sonestedt, Elinor Hallström
{"title":"平衡环境可持续性和营养:瑞典队列中与微量营养素摄入和状态相关的饮食气候影响。","authors":"Anna Stubbendorff, Ulrika Ericson, Ylva Bengtsson, Yan Borné, Emily Sonestedt, Elinor Hallström","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary shift is necessary for improving public health, mitigating climate change, and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Adaption of climate-friendly diets might prevent chronic diseases and reduce mortality; however, consuming diets with a low climate impact have been suggested to increase risk of some micronutrient deficiencies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine whether self-reported dietary intake varying in climate impact is associated with nutritional risks and benefits based on both dietary intakes and blood concentrations of micronutrients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the cross-sectional Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort (MDC, <i>n</i> = 25,970), dietary data were collected using a modified diet history method (food frequency questionnaire, diary, and interview). Blood samples were drawn and analyzed for micronutrients in different subgroups. Life cycle assessment data were used to estimate dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), from farm to fork. Quintiles of dietary climate impact were examined in relation to nutrient intake and status using linear and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean estimated dietary GHGE were 5.9 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents per day (females: 5.4, males: 6.6). Participants consuming a more climate-friendly diet had lower proportion of animal-sourced foods, energy intake, and intake of all micronutrients assessed (<i>n</i> = 17). Prevalence of anemia was higher in females consuming more climate-friendly diets, but the rates were low across all climate-diet groups (4.6% in Q1 compared with 3.3% in Q5; <i>P</i>-trend: 0.02), but not in males (<i>P</i>-trend: 0.131). No significant trends were observed in nutrient status of vitamin D, selenium, zinc, and folate across dietary GHGE quintiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a lower intake of micronutrients, more climate-friendly diets did not substantially increase risk of deficiencies. The study highlights the importance of measuring both nutrient intake and status when discussing nutritional consequences of sustainable eating.</p>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"9 8","pages":"107501"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Environmental Sustainability and Nutrition: Dietary Climate Impact in Relation to Micronutrient Intake and Status in a Swedish Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Stubbendorff, Ulrika Ericson, Ylva Bengtsson, Yan Borné, Emily Sonestedt, Elinor Hallström\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary shift is necessary for improving public health, mitigating climate change, and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Adaption of climate-friendly diets might prevent chronic diseases and reduce mortality; however, consuming diets with a low climate impact have been suggested to increase risk of some micronutrient deficiencies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine whether self-reported dietary intake varying in climate impact is associated with nutritional risks and benefits based on both dietary intakes and blood concentrations of micronutrients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the cross-sectional Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort (MDC, <i>n</i> = 25,970), dietary data were collected using a modified diet history method (food frequency questionnaire, diary, and interview). Blood samples were drawn and analyzed for micronutrients in different subgroups. Life cycle assessment data were used to estimate dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), from farm to fork. Quintiles of dietary climate impact were examined in relation to nutrient intake and status using linear and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean estimated dietary GHGE were 5.9 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents per day (females: 5.4, males: 6.6). Participants consuming a more climate-friendly diet had lower proportion of animal-sourced foods, energy intake, and intake of all micronutrients assessed (<i>n</i> = 17). Prevalence of anemia was higher in females consuming more climate-friendly diets, but the rates were low across all climate-diet groups (4.6% in Q1 compared with 3.3% in Q5; <i>P</i>-trend: 0.02), but not in males (<i>P</i>-trend: 0.131). No significant trends were observed in nutrient status of vitamin D, selenium, zinc, and folate across dietary GHGE quintiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a lower intake of micronutrients, more climate-friendly diets did not substantially increase risk of deficiencies. The study highlights the importance of measuring both nutrient intake and status when discussing nutritional consequences of sustainable eating.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"9 8\",\"pages\":\"107501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:饮食转变对于改善公共卫生、减缓气候变化和实现可持续发展目标是必要的。适应气候友好型饮食可以预防慢性病并降低死亡率;然而,食用对气候影响较小的饮食会增加某些微量营养素缺乏的风险。目的:本研究旨在研究基于饮食摄入和血液微量营养素浓度,自我报告的饮食摄入变化对气候影响是否与营养风险和益处相关。方法:在Malmö饮食与癌症横断面队列(MDC, n = 25,970)中,使用改进的饮食史方法(食物频率问卷、日记和访谈)收集饮食数据。抽取血样并分析不同亚组的微量营养素。生命周期评估数据用于估算从农场到餐桌的膳食温室气体排放(GHGE)。使用线性和逻辑回归检查饮食气候影响的五分位数与营养摄入和状态的关系。结果:平均估计每日饮食GHGE为5.9 kg二氧化碳当量(女性:5.4,男性:6.6)。食用气候友好型饮食的参与者,动物源性食物的比例、能量摄入和所有微量营养素的摄入都较低(n = 17)。食用气候友好型饮食的女性贫血患病率较高,但所有气候饮食组的患病率都较低(第一季度为4.6%,第五季度为3.3%;p趋势为0.02),但男性没有(p趋势为0.131)。在膳食GHGE五分位数中,维生素D、硒、锌和叶酸的营养状况没有明显的变化趋势。结论:尽管微量营养素摄入量较低,但气候友好型饮食并没有显著增加缺乏营养素的风险。该研究强调了在讨论可持续饮食的营养后果时测量营养摄入和状态的重要性。
Balancing Environmental Sustainability and Nutrition: Dietary Climate Impact in Relation to Micronutrient Intake and Status in a Swedish Cohort.
Background: Dietary shift is necessary for improving public health, mitigating climate change, and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Adaption of climate-friendly diets might prevent chronic diseases and reduce mortality; however, consuming diets with a low climate impact have been suggested to increase risk of some micronutrient deficiencies.
Objectives: This study aimed to examine whether self-reported dietary intake varying in climate impact is associated with nutritional risks and benefits based on both dietary intakes and blood concentrations of micronutrients.
Methods: In the cross-sectional Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort (MDC, n = 25,970), dietary data were collected using a modified diet history method (food frequency questionnaire, diary, and interview). Blood samples were drawn and analyzed for micronutrients in different subgroups. Life cycle assessment data were used to estimate dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), from farm to fork. Quintiles of dietary climate impact were examined in relation to nutrient intake and status using linear and logistic regression.
Results: The mean estimated dietary GHGE were 5.9 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents per day (females: 5.4, males: 6.6). Participants consuming a more climate-friendly diet had lower proportion of animal-sourced foods, energy intake, and intake of all micronutrients assessed (n = 17). Prevalence of anemia was higher in females consuming more climate-friendly diets, but the rates were low across all climate-diet groups (4.6% in Q1 compared with 3.3% in Q5; P-trend: 0.02), but not in males (P-trend: 0.131). No significant trends were observed in nutrient status of vitamin D, selenium, zinc, and folate across dietary GHGE quintiles.
Conclusions: Despite a lower intake of micronutrients, more climate-friendly diets did not substantially increase risk of deficiencies. The study highlights the importance of measuring both nutrient intake and status when discussing nutritional consequences of sustainable eating.