Hillevi Bergvall, Gerhard Andersson, Tobias Lundgren, Benjamin Bohman
{"title":"从病人的角度看,治疗师坚持认知行为疗法和护理质量。","authors":"Hillevi Bergvall, Gerhard Andersson, Tobias Lundgren, Benjamin Bohman","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2548367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite efforts to implement evidence-based guidelines, little is known about the quality of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder in routine clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate therapist adherence to CBT, and related aspects of quality of care, from a patient perspective. In a cross-sectional study, 90 participants from 21 routine psychiatric outpatient units in Stockholm completed a web-based survey post-CBT. Participants reported a high degree of therapist adherence to CBT techniques and procedures (<i>M</i> = 3.02 on a scale of 0 to 4), with higher adherence for social anxiety disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder than for depression (<i>p</i> = .002, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.21). Therapist adherence was moderately correlated with patient improvement (τs = .37-.38, <i>p</i>s < .001). Participants reported a high degree of symptom improvement (<i>M</i> = 3.10) and treatment satisfaction (<i>M</i> = <i>3</i>.38) and received a median of 15 sessions. Also, we found examples of excessive healthcare provision and non-adherence, as 17% far exceeded the recommended number of sessions, 80% had concurrent psychotropic treatments despite lower guideline priority, and 11% took benzodiazepines though not recommended. In conclusion, we found that CBT was delivered with high quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapist adherence to cognitive-behavioural therapy and quality of care from a patient perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Hillevi Bergvall, Gerhard Andersson, Tobias Lundgren, Benjamin Bohman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16506073.2025.2548367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite efforts to implement evidence-based guidelines, little is known about the quality of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder in routine clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate therapist adherence to CBT, and related aspects of quality of care, from a patient perspective. In a cross-sectional study, 90 participants from 21 routine psychiatric outpatient units in Stockholm completed a web-based survey post-CBT. Participants reported a high degree of therapist adherence to CBT techniques and procedures (<i>M</i> = 3.02 on a scale of 0 to 4), with higher adherence for social anxiety disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder than for depression (<i>p</i> = .002, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.21). Therapist adherence was moderately correlated with patient improvement (τs = .37-.38, <i>p</i>s < .001). Participants reported a high degree of symptom improvement (<i>M</i> = 3.10) and treatment satisfaction (<i>M</i> = <i>3</i>.38) and received a median of 15 sessions. Also, we found examples of excessive healthcare provision and non-adherence, as 17% far exceeded the recommended number of sessions, 80% had concurrent psychotropic treatments despite lower guideline priority, and 11% took benzodiazepines though not recommended. In conclusion, we found that CBT was delivered with high quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2548367\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2548367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Therapist adherence to cognitive-behavioural therapy and quality of care from a patient perspective.
Despite efforts to implement evidence-based guidelines, little is known about the quality of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder in routine clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate therapist adherence to CBT, and related aspects of quality of care, from a patient perspective. In a cross-sectional study, 90 participants from 21 routine psychiatric outpatient units in Stockholm completed a web-based survey post-CBT. Participants reported a high degree of therapist adherence to CBT techniques and procedures (M = 3.02 on a scale of 0 to 4), with higher adherence for social anxiety disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder than for depression (p = .002, ω2 = 0.21). Therapist adherence was moderately correlated with patient improvement (τs = .37-.38, ps < .001). Participants reported a high degree of symptom improvement (M = 3.10) and treatment satisfaction (M = 3.38) and received a median of 15 sessions. Also, we found examples of excessive healthcare provision and non-adherence, as 17% far exceeded the recommended number of sessions, 80% had concurrent psychotropic treatments despite lower guideline priority, and 11% took benzodiazepines though not recommended. In conclusion, we found that CBT was delivered with high quality.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.