从病人的角度看,治疗师坚持认知行为疗法和护理质量。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Hillevi Bergvall, Gerhard Andersson, Tobias Lundgren, Benjamin Bohman
{"title":"从病人的角度看,治疗师坚持认知行为疗法和护理质量。","authors":"Hillevi Bergvall, Gerhard Andersson, Tobias Lundgren, Benjamin Bohman","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2548367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite efforts to implement evidence-based guidelines, little is known about the quality of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder in routine clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate therapist adherence to CBT, and related aspects of quality of care, from a patient perspective. In a cross-sectional study, 90 participants from 21 routine psychiatric outpatient units in Stockholm completed a web-based survey post-CBT. Participants reported a high degree of therapist adherence to CBT techniques and procedures (<i>M</i> = 3.02 on a scale of 0 to 4), with higher adherence for social anxiety disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder than for depression (<i>p</i> = .002, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.21). Therapist adherence was moderately correlated with patient improvement (τs = .37-.38, <i>p</i>s < .001). Participants reported a high degree of symptom improvement (<i>M</i>  = 3.10) and treatment satisfaction (<i>M</i> = <i>3</i>.38) and received a median of 15 sessions. Also, we found examples of excessive healthcare provision and non-adherence, as 17% far exceeded the recommended number of sessions, 80% had concurrent psychotropic treatments despite lower guideline priority, and 11% took benzodiazepines though not recommended. In conclusion, we found that CBT was delivered with high quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapist adherence to cognitive-behavioural therapy and quality of care from a patient perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Hillevi Bergvall, Gerhard Andersson, Tobias Lundgren, Benjamin Bohman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16506073.2025.2548367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite efforts to implement evidence-based guidelines, little is known about the quality of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder in routine clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate therapist adherence to CBT, and related aspects of quality of care, from a patient perspective. In a cross-sectional study, 90 participants from 21 routine psychiatric outpatient units in Stockholm completed a web-based survey post-CBT. Participants reported a high degree of therapist adherence to CBT techniques and procedures (<i>M</i> = 3.02 on a scale of 0 to 4), with higher adherence for social anxiety disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder than for depression (<i>p</i> = .002, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.21). Therapist adherence was moderately correlated with patient improvement (τs = .37-.38, <i>p</i>s < .001). Participants reported a high degree of symptom improvement (<i>M</i>  = 3.10) and treatment satisfaction (<i>M</i> = <i>3</i>.38) and received a median of 15 sessions. Also, we found examples of excessive healthcare provision and non-adherence, as 17% far exceeded the recommended number of sessions, 80% had concurrent psychotropic treatments despite lower guideline priority, and 11% took benzodiazepines though not recommended. In conclusion, we found that CBT was delivered with high quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2548367\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2548367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管努力实施循证指南,但在常规临床实践中,对抑郁症、焦虑症、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍的认知行为疗法(CBT)的质量知之甚少。本研究旨在从患者的角度调查治疗师对CBT的依从性,以及护理质量的相关方面。在一项横断面研究中,来自斯德哥尔摩21个常规精神科门诊单位的90名参与者在cbt后完成了一项基于网络的调查。参与者报告治疗师对CBT技术和程序的高度依从性(M = 3.02,在0到4的范围内),对社交焦虑障碍和创伤后应激障碍的依从性高于抑郁症(p =。002, ω2 = 0.21)。治疗师依从性与患者改善(τs = 0.37 - 0.38, ps M = 3.10)和治疗满意度(M = 3.38)中度相关,接受的中位数为15次治疗。此外,我们还发现了过度提供医疗保健和不遵守的例子,17%的患者远远超过了建议的治疗次数,80%的患者同时接受精神药物治疗,尽管指南的优先级较低,11%的患者服用苯二氮卓类药物,尽管不建议服用。总之,我们发现CBT是高质量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapist adherence to cognitive-behavioural therapy and quality of care from a patient perspective.

Despite efforts to implement evidence-based guidelines, little is known about the quality of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder in routine clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate therapist adherence to CBT, and related aspects of quality of care, from a patient perspective. In a cross-sectional study, 90 participants from 21 routine psychiatric outpatient units in Stockholm completed a web-based survey post-CBT. Participants reported a high degree of therapist adherence to CBT techniques and procedures (M = 3.02 on a scale of 0 to 4), with higher adherence for social anxiety disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder than for depression (p = .002, ω2 = 0.21). Therapist adherence was moderately correlated with patient improvement (τs = .37-.38, ps < .001). Participants reported a high degree of symptom improvement (M  = 3.10) and treatment satisfaction (M = 3.38) and received a median of 15 sessions. Also, we found examples of excessive healthcare provision and non-adherence, as 17% far exceeded the recommended number of sessions, 80% had concurrent psychotropic treatments despite lower guideline priority, and 11% took benzodiazepines though not recommended. In conclusion, we found that CBT was delivered with high quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信