在胸部人群筛查中早期发现心血管疾病:快速兴起的心脏CT应用的挑战。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Anna N H Walstra, Jan Willem C Gratama, Marjolein A Heuvelmans, Matthijs Oudkerk
{"title":"在胸部人群筛查中早期发现心血管疾病:快速兴起的心脏CT应用的挑战。","authors":"Anna N H Walstra, Jan Willem C Gratama, Marjolein A Heuvelmans, Matthijs Oudkerk","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer-related mortality in high-risk individuals, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of death due to shared risk factors such as smoking and age. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) assessment offers an opportunity for concurrent cardiovascular screening, with higher CAC scores indicating increased CVD risk and mortality. Despite guidelines recommending CAC-scoring on all non-contrast chest CT scans, a lack of standardization leads to underreporting and missed opportunities for preventive care. Routine CAC-scoring in LCS can enable personalized CVD management and reduce unnecessary treatments. However, challenges persist in achieving adequate diagnostic quality with one combined image acquisition for both lung and cardiovascular assessment. Advancements in CT technology have improved CAC quantification on low-dose CT scans. Electron-beam tomography, valued for superior temporal resolution, was replaced by multi-detector CT for better spatial resolution and general usability. Dual-source CT further improved temporal resolution and reduced motion artifacts, making non-gated CT protocols for CAC-assessment possible. Additionally, artificial intelligence-based CAC quantification can reduce the added workload of cardiovascular screening within LCS programs. This review explores recent advancements in cardiac CT technologies that address prior challenges in opportunistic CVD screening and considers key factors for integrating CVD screening into LCS programs, aiming for high-quality standardization in CAC reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in Chest Population Screening: Challenges for a Rapidly Emerging Cardiac CT Application.\",\"authors\":\"Anna N H Walstra, Jan Willem C Gratama, Marjolein A Heuvelmans, Matthijs Oudkerk\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer-related mortality in high-risk individuals, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of death due to shared risk factors such as smoking and age. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) assessment offers an opportunity for concurrent cardiovascular screening, with higher CAC scores indicating increased CVD risk and mortality. Despite guidelines recommending CAC-scoring on all non-contrast chest CT scans, a lack of standardization leads to underreporting and missed opportunities for preventive care. Routine CAC-scoring in LCS can enable personalized CVD management and reduce unnecessary treatments. However, challenges persist in achieving adequate diagnostic quality with one combined image acquisition for both lung and cardiovascular assessment. Advancements in CT technology have improved CAC quantification on low-dose CT scans. Electron-beam tomography, valued for superior temporal resolution, was replaced by multi-detector CT for better spatial resolution and general usability. Dual-source CT further improved temporal resolution and reduced motion artifacts, making non-gated CT protocols for CAC-assessment possible. Additionally, artificial intelligence-based CAC quantification can reduce the added workload of cardiovascular screening within LCS programs. This review explores recent advancements in cardiac CT technologies that address prior challenges in opportunistic CVD screening and considers key factors for integrating CVD screening into LCS programs, aiming for high-quality standardization in CAC reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然肺癌筛查(LCS)降低了高危人群与肺癌相关的死亡率,但由于吸烟和年龄等共同的风险因素,心血管疾病(CVD)仍然是导致死亡的主要原因。冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评估提供了同时进行心血管筛查的机会,较高的CAC评分表明心血管疾病的风险和死亡率增加。尽管指南建议对所有非对比胸部CT扫描进行cac评分,但由于缺乏标准化,导致漏报和错失预防性护理的机会。LCS常规cac评分可以实现个性化CVD管理,减少不必要的治疗。然而,在实现足够的诊断质量与一个联合图像采集肺和心血管评估的挑战仍然存在。CT技术的进步改善了低剂量CT扫描的CAC定量。电子束断层扫描具有优越的时间分辨率,被多探测器CT取代,具有更好的空间分辨率和普遍的可用性。双源CT进一步提高了时间分辨率,减少了运动伪影,使非门控CT方案成为可能。此外,基于人工智能的CAC量化可以减少LCS项目中心血管筛查的额外工作量。本综述探讨了心脏CT技术的最新进展,这些技术解决了机会性CVD筛查的先前挑战,并考虑了将CVD筛查纳入LCS计划的关键因素,旨在实现CAC报告的高质量标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in Chest Population Screening: Challenges for a Rapidly Emerging Cardiac CT Application.

While lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer-related mortality in high-risk individuals, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of death due to shared risk factors such as smoking and age. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) assessment offers an opportunity for concurrent cardiovascular screening, with higher CAC scores indicating increased CVD risk and mortality. Despite guidelines recommending CAC-scoring on all non-contrast chest CT scans, a lack of standardization leads to underreporting and missed opportunities for preventive care. Routine CAC-scoring in LCS can enable personalized CVD management and reduce unnecessary treatments. However, challenges persist in achieving adequate diagnostic quality with one combined image acquisition for both lung and cardiovascular assessment. Advancements in CT technology have improved CAC quantification on low-dose CT scans. Electron-beam tomography, valued for superior temporal resolution, was replaced by multi-detector CT for better spatial resolution and general usability. Dual-source CT further improved temporal resolution and reduced motion artifacts, making non-gated CT protocols for CAC-assessment possible. Additionally, artificial intelligence-based CAC quantification can reduce the added workload of cardiovascular screening within LCS programs. This review explores recent advancements in cardiac CT technologies that address prior challenges in opportunistic CVD screening and considers key factors for integrating CVD screening into LCS programs, aiming for high-quality standardization in CAC reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信