副肝静脉再通:治疗肝静脉流出道阻塞的可行方法。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yashwant Patidar, Vasav Tyagi, Navojit Chatterjee, Rajeev Ranjan, Amar Mukund, Manoj Kumar Sharma, Shiv Kumar Sarin
{"title":"副肝静脉再通:治疗肝静脉流出道阻塞的可行方法。","authors":"Yashwant Patidar, Vasav Tyagi, Navojit Chatterjee, Rajeev Ranjan, Amar Mukund, Manoj Kumar Sharma, Shiv Kumar Sarin","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the mid and long term outcome of recanalization of accessory hepatic vein secondary to hepatic venous outflow obstruction and to compare the mid and long term outcome and technical efficacy and safety of accessory hepatic vein recanalization with native hepatic vein recanalization in HVOTO patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study, conducted at a single centre, evaluated the mid- and long-term outcomes of AHV recanalization compared to native HV recanalization in 170 HVOTO patients treated between January 2013 and October 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of recanalization performed: AHV (n = 26) and native HV (n = 144). Technical success was achieved in 100% of AHV cases and 95.8% of native HV cases. The primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 95.9%, 92.3%, and 76.9% for AHV and 96.5%, 93%, and 79.1% for native HV, respectively. Significant improvements in liver stiffness, clinical symptoms, and hepatic function were observed post-intervention in both groups, with no significant differences in outcomes. Transplant-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were also comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that AHV recanalization is a safe and effective alternative to native HV recanalization, providing comparable long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>It offers a promising option for HVOTO patients with dominant AHV and extensive intrahepatic collaterals, further supporting its integration into the stepwise management of HVOTO.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessory Hepatic Vein Recanalization: A Viable Approach in Hepatic Vein Outflow Tract Obstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Yashwant Patidar, Vasav Tyagi, Navojit Chatterjee, Rajeev Ranjan, Amar Mukund, Manoj Kumar Sharma, Shiv Kumar Sarin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the mid and long term outcome of recanalization of accessory hepatic vein secondary to hepatic venous outflow obstruction and to compare the mid and long term outcome and technical efficacy and safety of accessory hepatic vein recanalization with native hepatic vein recanalization in HVOTO patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study, conducted at a single centre, evaluated the mid- and long-term outcomes of AHV recanalization compared to native HV recanalization in 170 HVOTO patients treated between January 2013 and October 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of recanalization performed: AHV (n = 26) and native HV (n = 144). Technical success was achieved in 100% of AHV cases and 95.8% of native HV cases. The primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 95.9%, 92.3%, and 76.9% for AHV and 96.5%, 93%, and 79.1% for native HV, respectively. Significant improvements in liver stiffness, clinical symptoms, and hepatic function were observed post-intervention in both groups, with no significant differences in outcomes. Transplant-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were also comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that AHV recanalization is a safe and effective alternative to native HV recanalization, providing comparable long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>It offers a promising option for HVOTO patients with dominant AHV and extensive intrahepatic collaterals, further supporting its integration into the stepwise management of HVOTO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价肝静脉流出梗阻继发肝副静脉再通的中长期疗效,比较肝副静脉再通与肝静脉再通在HVOTO患者中的中长期疗效及技术有效性和安全性。方法:这项在单一中心进行的回顾性观察性研究,评估了2013年1月至2020年10月期间170名HVOTO患者AHV再通与原生HV再通的中期和长期结果。结果:患者根据再通类型分为两组:AHV (n = 26)和原生HV (n = 144)。技术成功率为100%的AHV病例和95.8%的本地HV病例。AHV的1年、3年和5年的原发性通畅率分别为95.9%、92.3%和76.9%,原生HV的96.5%、93%和79.1%。干预后,两组患者的肝硬度、临床症状和肝功能均有显著改善,结果无显著差异。1年、3年和5年的无移植存活率在两组之间也具有可比性。结论:本研究表明,AHV再通术是一种安全有效的替代原生HV再通术的方法,具有相当的长期疗效。知识进展:它为显性AHV和广泛肝内络的HVOTO患者提供了一个有希望的选择,进一步支持其融入HVOTO的逐步管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accessory Hepatic Vein Recanalization: A Viable Approach in Hepatic Vein Outflow Tract Obstruction.

Objective: To evaluate the mid and long term outcome of recanalization of accessory hepatic vein secondary to hepatic venous outflow obstruction and to compare the mid and long term outcome and technical efficacy and safety of accessory hepatic vein recanalization with native hepatic vein recanalization in HVOTO patients.

Methods: This retrospective observational study, conducted at a single centre, evaluated the mid- and long-term outcomes of AHV recanalization compared to native HV recanalization in 170 HVOTO patients treated between January 2013 and October 2020.

Results: Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of recanalization performed: AHV (n = 26) and native HV (n = 144). Technical success was achieved in 100% of AHV cases and 95.8% of native HV cases. The primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 95.9%, 92.3%, and 76.9% for AHV and 96.5%, 93%, and 79.1% for native HV, respectively. Significant improvements in liver stiffness, clinical symptoms, and hepatic function were observed post-intervention in both groups, with no significant differences in outcomes. Transplant-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were also comparable between groups.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that AHV recanalization is a safe and effective alternative to native HV recanalization, providing comparable long-term outcomes.

Advances in knowledge: It offers a promising option for HVOTO patients with dominant AHV and extensive intrahepatic collaterals, further supporting its integration into the stepwise management of HVOTO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信