{"title":"底物粘弹性调节成纤维细胞粘附和迁移。","authors":"Neha Paddillaya, Akshar Rao, Anshul Shrivastava, Imnatoshi Jamir, Kundan Sengupta, Namrata Gundiah","doi":"10.1116/6.0004585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) modulate cell-substrate interactions and influence cellular behaviors such as contractility, migration, and proliferation. Although the effects of substrate stiffness on mechanobiology have been well studied, the role of ECM viscoelasticity in fibrotic progression remains less understood. To examine how viscoelasticity affects the biophysical properties and regulates signaling of human mammary fibroblasts, we engineered elastic (E) and viscoelastic (VE) polyacrylamide hydrogels with comparable storage moduli (∼14.52 ± 1.03 kPa) but distinctly different loss moduli; mean loss moduli for VE gels was 36.9% higher at 0.05 Hz than E gels. Fibroblasts cultured on E hydrogels spread extensively (2428.93 ± 864.71 μm2), developed prominent stress fibers with higher zyxin intensity, and generated higher traction stresses (2931.57 ± 1732.61 Pa). In contrast, fibroblasts on VE substrates had 54.2% smaller focal adhesion areas, exhibited 51.8% lower critical adhesion strengths, and generated 21% lower traction stresses (p < 0.001). These substrates also promoted migration and showed enhanced proliferation with reduced Yes-associated protein (YAP) activity, suggesting a mechanotransduction shift that may involve alternative signaling pathways. In contrast, E substrates showed YAP nuclear translocation, consistent with greater cytoskeletal tension and contractility. These findings highlight the importance of energy dissipation mechanisms in regulating fibroblast function on substrates mimicking the fibrotic milieu. Our results demonstrate that tuning the ECM viscoelasticity is a useful strategy to regulate cell behaviors in tissue-engineered scaffolds and develop better disease modeling for regenerative medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":9053,"journal":{"name":"Biointerphases","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substrate viscoelasticity regulates fibroblast adhesion and migration.\",\"authors\":\"Neha Paddillaya, Akshar Rao, Anshul Shrivastava, Imnatoshi Jamir, Kundan Sengupta, Namrata Gundiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1116/6.0004585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) modulate cell-substrate interactions and influence cellular behaviors such as contractility, migration, and proliferation. Although the effects of substrate stiffness on mechanobiology have been well studied, the role of ECM viscoelasticity in fibrotic progression remains less understood. To examine how viscoelasticity affects the biophysical properties and regulates signaling of human mammary fibroblasts, we engineered elastic (E) and viscoelastic (VE) polyacrylamide hydrogels with comparable storage moduli (∼14.52 ± 1.03 kPa) but distinctly different loss moduli; mean loss moduli for VE gels was 36.9% higher at 0.05 Hz than E gels. Fibroblasts cultured on E hydrogels spread extensively (2428.93 ± 864.71 μm2), developed prominent stress fibers with higher zyxin intensity, and generated higher traction stresses (2931.57 ± 1732.61 Pa). In contrast, fibroblasts on VE substrates had 54.2% smaller focal adhesion areas, exhibited 51.8% lower critical adhesion strengths, and generated 21% lower traction stresses (p < 0.001). These substrates also promoted migration and showed enhanced proliferation with reduced Yes-associated protein (YAP) activity, suggesting a mechanotransduction shift that may involve alternative signaling pathways. In contrast, E substrates showed YAP nuclear translocation, consistent with greater cytoskeletal tension and contractility. These findings highlight the importance of energy dissipation mechanisms in regulating fibroblast function on substrates mimicking the fibrotic milieu. Our results demonstrate that tuning the ECM viscoelasticity is a useful strategy to regulate cell behaviors in tissue-engineered scaffolds and develop better disease modeling for regenerative medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biointerphases\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biointerphases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0004585\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biointerphases","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0004585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Substrate viscoelasticity regulates fibroblast adhesion and migration.
Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) modulate cell-substrate interactions and influence cellular behaviors such as contractility, migration, and proliferation. Although the effects of substrate stiffness on mechanobiology have been well studied, the role of ECM viscoelasticity in fibrotic progression remains less understood. To examine how viscoelasticity affects the biophysical properties and regulates signaling of human mammary fibroblasts, we engineered elastic (E) and viscoelastic (VE) polyacrylamide hydrogels with comparable storage moduli (∼14.52 ± 1.03 kPa) but distinctly different loss moduli; mean loss moduli for VE gels was 36.9% higher at 0.05 Hz than E gels. Fibroblasts cultured on E hydrogels spread extensively (2428.93 ± 864.71 μm2), developed prominent stress fibers with higher zyxin intensity, and generated higher traction stresses (2931.57 ± 1732.61 Pa). In contrast, fibroblasts on VE substrates had 54.2% smaller focal adhesion areas, exhibited 51.8% lower critical adhesion strengths, and generated 21% lower traction stresses (p < 0.001). These substrates also promoted migration and showed enhanced proliferation with reduced Yes-associated protein (YAP) activity, suggesting a mechanotransduction shift that may involve alternative signaling pathways. In contrast, E substrates showed YAP nuclear translocation, consistent with greater cytoskeletal tension and contractility. These findings highlight the importance of energy dissipation mechanisms in regulating fibroblast function on substrates mimicking the fibrotic milieu. Our results demonstrate that tuning the ECM viscoelasticity is a useful strategy to regulate cell behaviors in tissue-engineered scaffolds and develop better disease modeling for regenerative medicine.
期刊介绍:
Biointerphases emphasizes quantitative characterization of biomaterials and biological interfaces. As an interdisciplinary journal, a strong foundation of chemistry, physics, biology, engineering, theory, and/or modelling is incorporated into originated articles, reviews, and opinionated essays. In addition to regular submissions, the journal regularly features In Focus sections, targeted on specific topics and edited by experts in the field. Biointerphases is an international journal with excellence in scientific peer-review. Biointerphases is indexed in PubMed and the Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics). Accepted papers appear online immediately after proof processing and are uploaded to key citation sources daily. The journal is based on a mixed subscription and open-access model: Typically, authors can publish without any page charges but if the authors wish to publish open access, they can do so for a modest fee.
Topics include:
bio-surface modification
nano-bio interface
protein-surface interactions
cell-surface interactions
in vivo and in vitro systems
biofilms / biofouling
biosensors / biodiagnostics
bio on a chip
coatings
interface spectroscopy
biotribology / biorheology
molecular recognition
ambient diagnostic methods
interface modelling
adhesion phenomena.