一般成年精神病患者认为我们应该如何称呼边缘型人格障碍?横断面研究,以寻找最可接受的诊断术语。

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
David Hayward, Amy Fourie, Donald MacIntyre, Douglas Steele
{"title":"一般成年精神病患者认为我们应该如何称呼边缘型人格障碍?横断面研究,以寻找最可接受的诊断术语。","authors":"David Hayward, Amy Fourie, Donald MacIntyre, Douglas Steele","doi":"10.1192/bjb.2025.10128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>To determine the most acceptable term for borderline personality disorder (BPD). We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients who know what it feels like to be diagnosed with a mental disorder. The main outcome measures were the proportion of participants offended and confused by alternative terms for BPD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two people participated in the study. Being diagnosed with a condition was more offensive than being diagnosed with a disorder (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 41.18, d.f. = 1, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Fluxithymia offended the fewest participants (13%), but was the most confusing term (31%). Emotionally unstable personality disorder was the most offensive term (63%). After fluxithymia, emotional intensity disorder was the least offensive term, and not especially confusing (11%). Changing BPD to emotional intensity disorder would avoid an offensive event every 3.6 diagnostic announcements.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The diagnostic term BPD should be replaced with emotional intensity disorder, because this term provides a balance of clarity and inoffensiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":8883,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do general adult psychiatry patients think we should call borderline personality disorder? A cross-sectional study to find the most acceptable diagnostic term.\",\"authors\":\"David Hayward, Amy Fourie, Donald MacIntyre, Douglas Steele\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjb.2025.10128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>To determine the most acceptable term for borderline personality disorder (BPD). We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients who know what it feels like to be diagnosed with a mental disorder. The main outcome measures were the proportion of participants offended and confused by alternative terms for BPD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two people participated in the study. Being diagnosed with a condition was more offensive than being diagnosed with a disorder (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 41.18, d.f. = 1, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Fluxithymia offended the fewest participants (13%), but was the most confusing term (31%). Emotionally unstable personality disorder was the most offensive term (63%). After fluxithymia, emotional intensity disorder was the least offensive term, and not especially confusing (11%). Changing BPD to emotional intensity disorder would avoid an offensive event every 3.6 diagnostic announcements.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The diagnostic term BPD should be replaced with emotional intensity disorder, because this term provides a balance of clarity and inoffensiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2025.10128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2025.10128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和方法:确定边缘型人格障碍(BPD)最可接受的术语。我们对那些知道被诊断为精神障碍的感觉的病人进行了一项横断面研究。主要的结果测量是参与者被BPD的替代术语冒犯和混淆的比例。结果:72人参与了这项研究。被诊断为某种疾病比被诊断为某种疾病更具攻击性(χ2 = 41.18, df = 1, P < 0.01)。Fluxithymia冒犯了最少的参与者(13%),但却是最令人困惑的术语(31%)。情绪不稳定型人格障碍是最具攻击性的词汇(63%)。在情绪激动障碍之后,情绪强度障碍是最不具攻击性的术语,也不是特别令人困惑(11%)。将BPD更改为情绪强度障碍,每3.6个诊断公告将避免一次冒犯事件。临床意义:诊断术语BPD应该被情感强度障碍所取代,因为这个术语提供了一个清晰和无害的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What do general adult psychiatry patients think we should call borderline personality disorder? A cross-sectional study to find the most acceptable diagnostic term.

Aims and method: To determine the most acceptable term for borderline personality disorder (BPD). We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients who know what it feels like to be diagnosed with a mental disorder. The main outcome measures were the proportion of participants offended and confused by alternative terms for BPD.

Results: Seventy-two people participated in the study. Being diagnosed with a condition was more offensive than being diagnosed with a disorder (χ2 = 41.18, d.f. = 1, P < 0.01). Fluxithymia offended the fewest participants (13%), but was the most confusing term (31%). Emotionally unstable personality disorder was the most offensive term (63%). After fluxithymia, emotional intensity disorder was the least offensive term, and not especially confusing (11%). Changing BPD to emotional intensity disorder would avoid an offensive event every 3.6 diagnostic announcements.

Clinical implications: The diagnostic term BPD should be replaced with emotional intensity disorder, because this term provides a balance of clarity and inoffensiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Bulletin
BJPsych Bulletin PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJPsych Bulletin prioritises research, opinion and informed reflection on the state of psychiatry, management of psychiatric services, and education and training in psychiatry. It provides essential reading and practical value to psychiatrists and anyone involved in the management and provision of mental healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信