急性冠脉综合征的治疗费用:回顾性分析。

Q3 Medicine
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2025.2530809
Luke Frizzell, Jonathan Deleon, Sean Reilly, Kendal Hammonds, Jose E Exaire, Timothy A Mixon, Billy Don Jones, Christopher Chiles, R Jay Widmer
{"title":"急性冠脉综合征的治疗费用:回顾性分析。","authors":"Luke Frizzell, Jonathan Deleon, Sean Reilly, Kendal Hammonds, Jose E Exaire, Timothy A Mixon, Billy Don Jones, Christopher Chiles, R Jay Widmer","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2530809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study analyzes the costs associated with treatment strategies for acute coronary syndrome: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and medical management (MM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a substudy of a previous analysis showing improved outcomes with CABG compared to PCI and MM, now focusing on variation in charges based on the type of treatment, hospital length of stay (LOS), and the occurrence of hospital readmission. We extracted total reimbursements, LOS, and readmissions for acute coronary syndrome patients (4267) between 2018 and 2022 from the electronic health record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expenses related to total charges were higher for CABG patients than PCI patients (+$106,047); however, average daily charges were lower for CABG patients compared to PCI patients (+$14,957). LOS was a primary driver for total charges, as CABG patients stayed 8.35 ± 0.50 days longer than PCI patients on average. The average difference between the total charge amount for readmitted and nonreadmitted patients was $22,765 ± $11,820. Even though readmission increases total charges, the charge per day was still less in patients with readmission due to their longer LOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The higher total charge amount and lower charge per day in CABG patients compared to PCI patients, as well as readmitted patients, highlights the importance of employing strategies to reduce LOS and minimize charges for CABG and readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"617-621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment charges for acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Luke Frizzell, Jonathan Deleon, Sean Reilly, Kendal Hammonds, Jose E Exaire, Timothy A Mixon, Billy Don Jones, Christopher Chiles, R Jay Widmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08998280.2025.2530809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study analyzes the costs associated with treatment strategies for acute coronary syndrome: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and medical management (MM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a substudy of a previous analysis showing improved outcomes with CABG compared to PCI and MM, now focusing on variation in charges based on the type of treatment, hospital length of stay (LOS), and the occurrence of hospital readmission. We extracted total reimbursements, LOS, and readmissions for acute coronary syndrome patients (4267) between 2018 and 2022 from the electronic health record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expenses related to total charges were higher for CABG patients than PCI patients (+$106,047); however, average daily charges were lower for CABG patients compared to PCI patients (+$14,957). LOS was a primary driver for total charges, as CABG patients stayed 8.35 ± 0.50 days longer than PCI patients on average. The average difference between the total charge amount for readmitted and nonreadmitted patients was $22,765 ± $11,820. Even though readmission increases total charges, the charge per day was still less in patients with readmission due to their longer LOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The higher total charge amount and lower charge per day in CABG patients compared to PCI patients, as well as readmitted patients, highlights the importance of employing strategies to reduce LOS and minimize charges for CABG and readmissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"617-621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2530809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2530809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究分析了急性冠状动脉综合征治疗策略的相关成本:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和医疗管理(MM)。方法:这是先前分析的一项亚研究,该分析显示与PCI和MM相比,CABG改善了结果,现在关注的是基于治疗类型、住院时间(LOS)和再入院发生率的收费变化。我们从电子健康记录中提取了2018年至2022年期间急性冠状动脉综合征患者(4267人)的总报销、LOS和再入院率。结果:CABG患者总费用相关费用高于PCI患者(+ 106,047美元);然而,与PCI患者相比,CABG患者的平均每日费用较低(+$14,957)。LOS是总费用的主要驱动因素,CABG患者比PCI患者平均停留时间长8.35±0.50天。再入院和非再入院患者的总费用平均差值为22,765±11,820美元。尽管再入院增加了总费用,但由于LOS较长,再入院患者每天的费用仍然较低。结论:与PCI患者和再入院患者相比,CABG患者的总费用较高,每日费用较低,这突出了采用策略降低LOS和最小化CABG和再入院费用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment charges for acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective analysis.

Background: This study analyzes the costs associated with treatment strategies for acute coronary syndrome: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and medical management (MM).

Methods: This is a substudy of a previous analysis showing improved outcomes with CABG compared to PCI and MM, now focusing on variation in charges based on the type of treatment, hospital length of stay (LOS), and the occurrence of hospital readmission. We extracted total reimbursements, LOS, and readmissions for acute coronary syndrome patients (4267) between 2018 and 2022 from the electronic health record.

Results: Expenses related to total charges were higher for CABG patients than PCI patients (+$106,047); however, average daily charges were lower for CABG patients compared to PCI patients (+$14,957). LOS was a primary driver for total charges, as CABG patients stayed 8.35 ± 0.50 days longer than PCI patients on average. The average difference between the total charge amount for readmitted and nonreadmitted patients was $22,765 ± $11,820. Even though readmission increases total charges, the charge per day was still less in patients with readmission due to their longer LOS.

Conclusion: The higher total charge amount and lower charge per day in CABG patients compared to PCI patients, as well as readmitted patients, highlights the importance of employing strategies to reduce LOS and minimize charges for CABG and readmissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信