{"title":"人工智能正确预测住院病人和观察病人出院情况的能力。","authors":"Linley E Watson, Rodney A Light, Courtney Shaver","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2524877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the ability of a real-time artificial intelligence (AI) tool to correctly align early during hospitalization with the discharge status of inpatient versus observation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study at Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple involved patients on 11 randomly chosen calendar days between August 2023 and October 2024. A real-time AI care level score (CLS) and machine learning likelihood (MeL) recommendations for inpatient versus observation discharge status were developed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare CLS, MeL, and commercial screening tool criteria with actual inpatient versus observation discharge status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The receiver operating characteristic curve for CLS-based prediction of the MeL recommendation for inpatients had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9954 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9954, 0.9998). The AUC for only CLS for predicting inpatient discharge was 0.8949 (95% CI = 0.8692, 0.9206). A CLS score ≥76 resulted in the highest correct classification rate of 86%. For CLS and the commercial screening tool, the AUC was the lowest at 0.8419 (95% CI = 0.8121, 0.871).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with a real-time AI CLS ≥76 had an 86% correct assignment of inpatient discharge status.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"662-665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ability of artificial intelligence to correctly predict inpatient versus observation hospital discharge status.\",\"authors\":\"Linley E Watson, Rodney A Light, Courtney Shaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08998280.2025.2524877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the ability of a real-time artificial intelligence (AI) tool to correctly align early during hospitalization with the discharge status of inpatient versus observation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study at Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple involved patients on 11 randomly chosen calendar days between August 2023 and October 2024. A real-time AI care level score (CLS) and machine learning likelihood (MeL) recommendations for inpatient versus observation discharge status were developed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare CLS, MeL, and commercial screening tool criteria with actual inpatient versus observation discharge status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The receiver operating characteristic curve for CLS-based prediction of the MeL recommendation for inpatients had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9954 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9954, 0.9998). The AUC for only CLS for predicting inpatient discharge was 0.8949 (95% CI = 0.8692, 0.9206). A CLS score ≥76 resulted in the highest correct classification rate of 86%. For CLS and the commercial screening tool, the AUC was the lowest at 0.8419 (95% CI = 0.8121, 0.871).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with a real-time AI CLS ≥76 had an 86% correct assignment of inpatient discharge status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"662-665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2524877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2524877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究评估了实时人工智能(AI)工具在住院早期与住院患者出院状态和观察状态正确对齐的能力。方法:这项回顾性病例对照研究在Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple,在2023年8月至2024年10月期间随机选择11个日历日的患者。制定了实时AI护理水平评分(CLS)和机器学习可能性(MeL)对住院患者和观察出院状态的建议。接受者工作特征曲线用于比较CLS、MeL和商业筛选工具标准与实际住院患者和观察出院状态。结果:基于cls预测住院患者MeL推荐的受试者工作特征曲线曲线下面积(AUC)最高,为0.9954(95%可信区间[CI] = 0.9954, 0.9998)。仅CLS预测住院患者出院的AUC为0.8949 (95% CI = 0.8692, 0.9206)。CLS评分≥76时,正确分类率最高,为86%。对于CLS和商业筛选工具,AUC最低,为0.8419 (95% CI = 0.8121, 0.871)。结论:实时AI CLS≥76的患者对住院出院状态的正确分配为86%。
Ability of artificial intelligence to correctly predict inpatient versus observation hospital discharge status.
Objective: This study assessed the ability of a real-time artificial intelligence (AI) tool to correctly align early during hospitalization with the discharge status of inpatient versus observation.
Methods: This retrospective case-control study at Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple involved patients on 11 randomly chosen calendar days between August 2023 and October 2024. A real-time AI care level score (CLS) and machine learning likelihood (MeL) recommendations for inpatient versus observation discharge status were developed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare CLS, MeL, and commercial screening tool criteria with actual inpatient versus observation discharge status.
Results: The receiver operating characteristic curve for CLS-based prediction of the MeL recommendation for inpatients had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9954 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9954, 0.9998). The AUC for only CLS for predicting inpatient discharge was 0.8949 (95% CI = 0.8692, 0.9206). A CLS score ≥76 resulted in the highest correct classification rate of 86%. For CLS and the commercial screening tool, the AUC was the lowest at 0.8419 (95% CI = 0.8121, 0.871).
Conclusions: Patients with a real-time AI CLS ≥76 had an 86% correct assignment of inpatient discharge status.