{"title":"碎片化QRS复合体作为心肌梗死无血流的预测因子:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tanawat Attachaipanich, Suthinee Attachaipanich, Thanaphat Thanyaratsarun, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Kotchakorn Kaewboot","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2523721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary no-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). This study aimed to evaluate the association between the presence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) and no-reflow in MI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across four databases from inception to July 20, 2024. The inclusion criteria were studies that enrolled MI patients, stratified by the presence of fQRS, and reported at least one of the following outcomes: no-reflow, infarct size, reinfarction, or repeat revascularization during hospitalization. No-reflow was defined as a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade < 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 studies with 5840 participants were analyzed using a random-effects model. The presence of fQRS was associated with a higher risk of no-reflow compared to non-fQRS in MI patients, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.08 (95% CI 1.39 to 3.12), <i>P</i> < 0.01. Subgroup analysis by study design supported this finding. However, there were no significant differences in infarct size, in-hospital reinfarction, or need for repeat revascularization between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of fQRS was associated with a higher risk of no-reflow in MI patients. fQRS could serve as a useful tool for predicting no-reflow and guiding primary prevention strategies in MI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"704-714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fragmented QRS complex as a predictor of no-reflow in myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tanawat Attachaipanich, Suthinee Attachaipanich, Thanaphat Thanyaratsarun, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Kotchakorn Kaewboot\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08998280.2025.2523721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary no-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). This study aimed to evaluate the association between the presence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) and no-reflow in MI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across four databases from inception to July 20, 2024. The inclusion criteria were studies that enrolled MI patients, stratified by the presence of fQRS, and reported at least one of the following outcomes: no-reflow, infarct size, reinfarction, or repeat revascularization during hospitalization. No-reflow was defined as a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade < 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 studies with 5840 participants were analyzed using a random-effects model. The presence of fQRS was associated with a higher risk of no-reflow compared to non-fQRS in MI patients, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.08 (95% CI 1.39 to 3.12), <i>P</i> < 0.01. Subgroup analysis by study design supported this finding. However, there were no significant differences in infarct size, in-hospital reinfarction, or need for repeat revascularization between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of fQRS was associated with a higher risk of no-reflow in MI patients. fQRS could serve as a useful tool for predicting no-reflow and guiding primary prevention strategies in MI patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"704-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351709/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2523721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2523721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:心肌梗死(MI)患者的冠状动脉无血流灌注与不良结局相关。本研究旨在评估心肌梗死患者碎片化QRS (fQRS)的存在与无再流之间的关系。方法:对4个数据库进行系统检索,检索时间为建库至2024年7月20日。纳入标准是纳入心肌梗死患者的研究,根据fQRS的存在进行分层,并报告以下至少一项结果:住院期间无再流、梗死面积、再梗死或重复血运重建。无回流定义为心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流等级< 3。结果:采用随机效应模型对19项研究共5840名参与者进行了分析。与非fQRS相比,心肌梗死患者中fQRS的存在与更高的无血流再流风险相关,优势比(OR)为2.08 (95% CI 1.39至3.12),P结论:fQRS的存在与心肌梗死患者中更高的无血流再流风险相关。fQRS可作为预测心肌梗死患者无血流再流和指导初级预防策略的有用工具。
Fragmented QRS complex as a predictor of no-reflow in myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Coronary no-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). This study aimed to evaluate the association between the presence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) and no-reflow in MI patients.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across four databases from inception to July 20, 2024. The inclusion criteria were studies that enrolled MI patients, stratified by the presence of fQRS, and reported at least one of the following outcomes: no-reflow, infarct size, reinfarction, or repeat revascularization during hospitalization. No-reflow was defined as a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade < 3.
Results: A total of 19 studies with 5840 participants were analyzed using a random-effects model. The presence of fQRS was associated with a higher risk of no-reflow compared to non-fQRS in MI patients, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.08 (95% CI 1.39 to 3.12), P < 0.01. Subgroup analysis by study design supported this finding. However, there were no significant differences in infarct size, in-hospital reinfarction, or need for repeat revascularization between groups.
Conclusions: The presence of fQRS was associated with a higher risk of no-reflow in MI patients. fQRS could serve as a useful tool for predicting no-reflow and guiding primary prevention strategies in MI patients.