围手术期舒适护理结合针对性手术室护理对大肠癌患者术后应激反应及护理满意度的影响

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Qiao Zeng, Jie Yang, Lili Jiang, Yinping Deng, Xuemei Luo, Jing Yang
{"title":"围手术期舒适护理结合针对性手术室护理对大肠癌患者术后应激反应及护理满意度的影响","authors":"Qiao Zeng, Jie Yang, Lili Jiang, Yinping Deng, Xuemei Luo, Jing Yang","doi":"10.62713/aic.4112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to explore the impact of perioperative comfort nursing combined with targeted operating room nursing on the stress response and nursing satisfaction in colorectal cancer patients, emphasizing the importance of precision nursing in enhancing postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed clinical data of colorectal cancer patients (n = 165) who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery at our hospital between February 2022 and February 2024. Grouped according to different perioperative nursing methods, and the patients were divided into two groups: the experimental group (n = 85) and the control group (n = 80). The control group received routine operating room nursing, while the experimental group received comfort nursing in addition to targeted operating room care. The differences in the impact of the two nursing models on patients' surgical-related indicators, stress response measured by Serum Amyloid A (SAA), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, pain scores, as well as nursing satisfaction, postoperative follow-up status, were evaluated and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group demonstrated significantly shorter postoperative times to first flatus, first out-of-bed activity, first oral intake, length of hospital stay, anastomotic healing time, and postoperative infection rate compared to the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). On days 1 and 2 after surgery, SAA, IL-6, and CRP levels were elevated in both groups compared to their preoperative levels, with the experimental group showing significantly lower levels than the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in the experimental group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In contrast, nursing satisfaction was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Six months and one year after surgery, the experimental group showed significantly higher scores on the Barthel index and the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) compared to the control group, while their Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores were significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating comfort nursing with a targeted operating room nursing approach during laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery helps promote early recovery, alleviate postoperative pain and stress response, improve nursing satisfaction, and promote patient recovery. The effectiveness of nursing interventions may partly depend on the stability of surgical techniques; further verification is needed through multi-center, large-sample studies. The synergistic effect of both factors contributes to the patient's recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 8","pages":"1089-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Perioperative Comfort Nursing Combined With Targeted Operating Room Nursing on Postoperative Stress Response and Nursing Satisfaction in Colorectal Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Qiao Zeng, Jie Yang, Lili Jiang, Yinping Deng, Xuemei Luo, Jing Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.62713/aic.4112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to explore the impact of perioperative comfort nursing combined with targeted operating room nursing on the stress response and nursing satisfaction in colorectal cancer patients, emphasizing the importance of precision nursing in enhancing postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed clinical data of colorectal cancer patients (n = 165) who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery at our hospital between February 2022 and February 2024. Grouped according to different perioperative nursing methods, and the patients were divided into two groups: the experimental group (n = 85) and the control group (n = 80). The control group received routine operating room nursing, while the experimental group received comfort nursing in addition to targeted operating room care. The differences in the impact of the two nursing models on patients' surgical-related indicators, stress response measured by Serum Amyloid A (SAA), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, pain scores, as well as nursing satisfaction, postoperative follow-up status, were evaluated and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group demonstrated significantly shorter postoperative times to first flatus, first out-of-bed activity, first oral intake, length of hospital stay, anastomotic healing time, and postoperative infection rate compared to the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). On days 1 and 2 after surgery, SAA, IL-6, and CRP levels were elevated in both groups compared to their preoperative levels, with the experimental group showing significantly lower levels than the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in the experimental group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In contrast, nursing satisfaction was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Six months and one year after surgery, the experimental group showed significantly higher scores on the Barthel index and the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) compared to the control group, while their Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores were significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating comfort nursing with a targeted operating room nursing approach during laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery helps promote early recovery, alleviate postoperative pain and stress response, improve nursing satisfaction, and promote patient recovery. The effectiveness of nursing interventions may partly depend on the stability of surgical techniques; further verification is needed through multi-center, large-sample studies. The synergistic effect of both factors contributes to the patient's recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"96 8\",\"pages\":\"1089-1102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.4112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.4112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨围手术期舒适护理结合针对性手术室护理对结直肠癌患者应激反应及护理满意度的影响,强调精准护理对促进术后康复的重要性。方法:回顾性分析2022年2月至2024年2月在我院行腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的165例结直肠癌患者的临床资料。根据围手术期护理方法的不同进行分组,将患者分为实验组(85例)和对照组(80例)。对照组患者给予常规手术室护理,实验组患者在给予针对性手术室护理的基础上给予舒适护理。比较两组患者两种护理模式对手术相关指标血清淀粉样蛋白A (SAA)、白细胞介素6 (IL-6)、c反应蛋白(CRP)水平应激反应、疼痛评分、护理满意度、术后随访情况的影响差异。结果:实验组术后第一次排气时间、第一次下床活动时间、第一次口服时间、住院时间、吻合口愈合时间、术后感染率均显著短于对照组(p < 0.05)。术后第1、2天,两组患者SAA、IL-6、CRP水平均较术前升高,且实验组显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。术后第1、3、7天,实验组视觉模拟评分(VAS)明显低于对照组(p < 0.05)。实验组护理满意度显著高于对照组(p < 0.05)。术后6个月和1年,实验组Barthel指数和生活质量问卷核心30分(QLQ-C30)得分显著高于对照组,汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)得分显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论:在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中,将舒适护理与有针对性的手术室护理相结合,有助于促进患者早期康复,缓解术后疼痛和应激反应,提高护理满意度,促进患者康复。护理干预的有效性可能部分取决于手术技术的稳定性;需要通过多中心、大样本研究进一步验证。两种因素的协同作用有助于患者的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Perioperative Comfort Nursing Combined With Targeted Operating Room Nursing on Postoperative Stress Response and Nursing Satisfaction in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Aim: This study aims to explore the impact of perioperative comfort nursing combined with targeted operating room nursing on the stress response and nursing satisfaction in colorectal cancer patients, emphasizing the importance of precision nursing in enhancing postoperative recovery.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical data of colorectal cancer patients (n = 165) who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery at our hospital between February 2022 and February 2024. Grouped according to different perioperative nursing methods, and the patients were divided into two groups: the experimental group (n = 85) and the control group (n = 80). The control group received routine operating room nursing, while the experimental group received comfort nursing in addition to targeted operating room care. The differences in the impact of the two nursing models on patients' surgical-related indicators, stress response measured by Serum Amyloid A (SAA), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, pain scores, as well as nursing satisfaction, postoperative follow-up status, were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

Results: The experimental group demonstrated significantly shorter postoperative times to first flatus, first out-of-bed activity, first oral intake, length of hospital stay, anastomotic healing time, and postoperative infection rate compared to the control group (p < 0.05). On days 1 and 2 after surgery, SAA, IL-6, and CRP levels were elevated in both groups compared to their preoperative levels, with the experimental group showing significantly lower levels than the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05). In contrast, nursing satisfaction was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p < 0.05). Six months and one year after surgery, the experimental group showed significantly higher scores on the Barthel index and the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) compared to the control group, while their Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores were significantly lower (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Integrating comfort nursing with a targeted operating room nursing approach during laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery helps promote early recovery, alleviate postoperative pain and stress response, improve nursing satisfaction, and promote patient recovery. The effectiveness of nursing interventions may partly depend on the stability of surgical techniques; further verification is needed through multi-center, large-sample studies. The synergistic effect of both factors contributes to the patient's recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信