与延迟接种相比,床边接种加快了检测速度,提高了微生物诊断效率。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/IJYI9617
Yulan Shi, Jingya Yu
{"title":"与延迟接种相比,床边接种加快了检测速度,提高了微生物诊断效率。","authors":"Yulan Shi, Jingya Yu","doi":"10.62347/IJYI9617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the differences in effects between bedside inoculation and traditional delayed inoculation methods in diagnosing wound infections, focusing on positivity rates, diagnostic cycles, and therapeutic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Wound Treatment Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from April 2023 to July 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a bedside inoculation group (n=132) or a delayed inoculation group (n=132). The effectiveness of the two methods was compared based on wound culture outcomes, bacterial species identified, detection of rare bacteria, wound healing rates, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bedside inoculation group had a significantly shorter detection report time compared to the delayed inoculation group (P<0.001). It also demonstrated a higher rate of detecting complex microbiomes (P=0.003). After 4 weeks, wound area reduction was significantly greater in the bedside group (P<0.001), and this difference remained significant at 8 weeks. The bedside group also had higher Barthel index scores (P<0.05), better wound healing scores (P<0.001), and greater patient satisfaction (P<0.001) than the delayed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bedside inoculation enhances wound infection diagnosis by accelerating result turnaround, reducing overtreatment, and promoting faster healing, ultimately improving patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 7","pages":"5575-5585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bedside inoculation accelerates detection and improves microbiological diagnosis efficiency compared to delayed inoculation.\",\"authors\":\"Yulan Shi, Jingya Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/IJYI9617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the differences in effects between bedside inoculation and traditional delayed inoculation methods in diagnosing wound infections, focusing on positivity rates, diagnostic cycles, and therapeutic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Wound Treatment Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from April 2023 to July 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a bedside inoculation group (n=132) or a delayed inoculation group (n=132). The effectiveness of the two methods was compared based on wound culture outcomes, bacterial species identified, detection of rare bacteria, wound healing rates, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bedside inoculation group had a significantly shorter detection report time compared to the delayed inoculation group (P<0.001). It also demonstrated a higher rate of detecting complex microbiomes (P=0.003). After 4 weeks, wound area reduction was significantly greater in the bedside group (P<0.001), and this difference remained significant at 8 weeks. The bedside group also had higher Barthel index scores (P<0.05), better wound healing scores (P<0.001), and greater patient satisfaction (P<0.001) than the delayed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bedside inoculation enhances wound infection diagnosis by accelerating result turnaround, reducing overtreatment, and promoting faster healing, ultimately improving patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"5575-5585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/IJYI9617\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/IJYI9617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价床边接种与传统延迟接种在伤口感染诊断中的效果差异,重点分析阳性率、诊断周期和治疗结果。方法:本前瞻性介入研究于2023年4月至2024年7月在四川大学华西医院创面治疗中心进行。患者随机分为床边接种组(n=132)和延迟接种组(n=132)。根据伤口培养结果、细菌种类鉴定、罕见细菌检测、伤口愈合率和患者满意度,比较两种方法的有效性。结果:床边接种组的检测报告时间明显短于延迟接种组(p结论:床边接种通过加速结果转化、减少过度治疗、促进更快愈合来提高伤口感染诊断,最终改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bedside inoculation accelerates detection and improves microbiological diagnosis efficiency compared to delayed inoculation.

Objective: To evaluate the differences in effects between bedside inoculation and traditional delayed inoculation methods in diagnosing wound infections, focusing on positivity rates, diagnostic cycles, and therapeutic outcomes.

Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Wound Treatment Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from April 2023 to July 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a bedside inoculation group (n=132) or a delayed inoculation group (n=132). The effectiveness of the two methods was compared based on wound culture outcomes, bacterial species identified, detection of rare bacteria, wound healing rates, and patient satisfaction.

Results: The bedside inoculation group had a significantly shorter detection report time compared to the delayed inoculation group (P<0.001). It also demonstrated a higher rate of detecting complex microbiomes (P=0.003). After 4 weeks, wound area reduction was significantly greater in the bedside group (P<0.001), and this difference remained significant at 8 weeks. The bedside group also had higher Barthel index scores (P<0.05), better wound healing scores (P<0.001), and greater patient satisfaction (P<0.001) than the delayed group.

Conclusion: Bedside inoculation enhances wound infection diagnosis by accelerating result turnaround, reducing overtreatment, and promoting faster healing, ultimately improving patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信