Ali Jaber Asiry, Musleh Hussain Mubarki, Ramzi Mohammed Dighriri, Ibrahem H Erwe, Fadi Abdu Munhish, Ahmed Ali Daghriri, Radeif Essa Shamakhi
{"title":"富血小板血浆注射治疗萎缩性鼻炎疗效的系统评价。","authors":"Ali Jaber Asiry, Musleh Hussain Mubarki, Ramzi Mohammed Dighriri, Ibrahem H Erwe, Fadi Abdu Munhish, Ahmed Ali Daghriri, Radeif Essa Shamakhi","doi":"10.1177/19458924251369316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAtrophic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic condition characterized by mucosal atrophy, crusting, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Current treatments are palliative and do not focus on tissue regeneration. Although platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention for its regenerative properties, evidence supporting its effectiveness in AR remains limited.ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PRP in the treatment of AR, focusing on nasal symptom relief, mucociliary clearance, and tissue repair biomarkers.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library from database inception to September 2024 for randomized clinical trials, prospective trials, and case series evaluating PRP for AR. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsPRP treatment resulted in significant improvements in nasal symptoms, with sino-nasal outcome test scores decreasing from 22.4 to 12.7. Four studies demonstrate enhanced mucociliary clearance, including a reduction in saccharin transit time from 420 s to 220 s in 1 study. Biochemical analyses revealed elevated levels of nitric oxide synthase and arginase, suggesting tissue regeneration. Improvements in anosmia and nasal obstruction symptom scores were also reported. No severe adverse effects were observed.ConclusionWhile PRP shows promise for AR, current evidence is compromised by diagnostic uncertainty, methodological inconsistencies, and potential commercial bias. Significant demographic variations suggest different patient populations were evaluated. Rigorous, independently funded trials with standardized protocols are essential before clinical recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"465-473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Patients With Atrophic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Jaber Asiry, Musleh Hussain Mubarki, Ramzi Mohammed Dighriri, Ibrahem H Erwe, Fadi Abdu Munhish, Ahmed Ali Daghriri, Radeif Essa Shamakhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924251369316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAtrophic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic condition characterized by mucosal atrophy, crusting, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Current treatments are palliative and do not focus on tissue regeneration. Although platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention for its regenerative properties, evidence supporting its effectiveness in AR remains limited.ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PRP in the treatment of AR, focusing on nasal symptom relief, mucociliary clearance, and tissue repair biomarkers.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library from database inception to September 2024 for randomized clinical trials, prospective trials, and case series evaluating PRP for AR. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsPRP treatment resulted in significant improvements in nasal symptoms, with sino-nasal outcome test scores decreasing from 22.4 to 12.7. Four studies demonstrate enhanced mucociliary clearance, including a reduction in saccharin transit time from 420 s to 220 s in 1 study. Biochemical analyses revealed elevated levels of nitric oxide synthase and arginase, suggesting tissue regeneration. Improvements in anosmia and nasal obstruction symptom scores were also reported. No severe adverse effects were observed.ConclusionWhile PRP shows promise for AR, current evidence is compromised by diagnostic uncertainty, methodological inconsistencies, and potential commercial bias. Significant demographic variations suggest different patient populations were evaluated. Rigorous, independently funded trials with standardized protocols are essential before clinical recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"465-473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251369316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251369316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Patients With Atrophic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review.
BackgroundAtrophic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic condition characterized by mucosal atrophy, crusting, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Current treatments are palliative and do not focus on tissue regeneration. Although platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention for its regenerative properties, evidence supporting its effectiveness in AR remains limited.ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PRP in the treatment of AR, focusing on nasal symptom relief, mucociliary clearance, and tissue repair biomarkers.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library from database inception to September 2024 for randomized clinical trials, prospective trials, and case series evaluating PRP for AR. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsPRP treatment resulted in significant improvements in nasal symptoms, with sino-nasal outcome test scores decreasing from 22.4 to 12.7. Four studies demonstrate enhanced mucociliary clearance, including a reduction in saccharin transit time from 420 s to 220 s in 1 study. Biochemical analyses revealed elevated levels of nitric oxide synthase and arginase, suggesting tissue regeneration. Improvements in anosmia and nasal obstruction symptom scores were also reported. No severe adverse effects were observed.ConclusionWhile PRP shows promise for AR, current evidence is compromised by diagnostic uncertainty, methodological inconsistencies, and potential commercial bias. Significant demographic variations suggest different patient populations were evaluated. Rigorous, independently funded trials with standardized protocols are essential before clinical recommendations.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.