富血小板血浆注射治疗萎缩性鼻炎疗效的系统评价。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-17 DOI:10.1177/19458924251369316
Ali Jaber Asiry, Musleh Hussain Mubarki, Ramzi Mohammed Dighriri, Ibrahem H Erwe, Fadi Abdu Munhish, Ahmed Ali Daghriri, Radeif Essa Shamakhi
{"title":"富血小板血浆注射治疗萎缩性鼻炎疗效的系统评价。","authors":"Ali Jaber Asiry, Musleh Hussain Mubarki, Ramzi Mohammed Dighriri, Ibrahem H Erwe, Fadi Abdu Munhish, Ahmed Ali Daghriri, Radeif Essa Shamakhi","doi":"10.1177/19458924251369316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAtrophic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic condition characterized by mucosal atrophy, crusting, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Current treatments are palliative and do not focus on tissue regeneration. Although platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention for its regenerative properties, evidence supporting its effectiveness in AR remains limited.ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PRP in the treatment of AR, focusing on nasal symptom relief, mucociliary clearance, and tissue repair biomarkers.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library from database inception to September 2024 for randomized clinical trials, prospective trials, and case series evaluating PRP for AR. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsPRP treatment resulted in significant improvements in nasal symptoms, with sino-nasal outcome test scores decreasing from 22.4 to 12.7. Four studies demonstrate enhanced mucociliary clearance, including a reduction in saccharin transit time from 420 s to 220 s in 1 study. Biochemical analyses revealed elevated levels of nitric oxide synthase and arginase, suggesting tissue regeneration. Improvements in anosmia and nasal obstruction symptom scores were also reported. No severe adverse effects were observed.ConclusionWhile PRP shows promise for AR, current evidence is compromised by diagnostic uncertainty, methodological inconsistencies, and potential commercial bias. Significant demographic variations suggest different patient populations were evaluated. Rigorous, independently funded trials with standardized protocols are essential before clinical recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"465-473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Patients With Atrophic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Jaber Asiry, Musleh Hussain Mubarki, Ramzi Mohammed Dighriri, Ibrahem H Erwe, Fadi Abdu Munhish, Ahmed Ali Daghriri, Radeif Essa Shamakhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924251369316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAtrophic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic condition characterized by mucosal atrophy, crusting, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Current treatments are palliative and do not focus on tissue regeneration. Although platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention for its regenerative properties, evidence supporting its effectiveness in AR remains limited.ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PRP in the treatment of AR, focusing on nasal symptom relief, mucociliary clearance, and tissue repair biomarkers.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library from database inception to September 2024 for randomized clinical trials, prospective trials, and case series evaluating PRP for AR. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsPRP treatment resulted in significant improvements in nasal symptoms, with sino-nasal outcome test scores decreasing from 22.4 to 12.7. Four studies demonstrate enhanced mucociliary clearance, including a reduction in saccharin transit time from 420 s to 220 s in 1 study. Biochemical analyses revealed elevated levels of nitric oxide synthase and arginase, suggesting tissue regeneration. Improvements in anosmia and nasal obstruction symptom scores were also reported. No severe adverse effects were observed.ConclusionWhile PRP shows promise for AR, current evidence is compromised by diagnostic uncertainty, methodological inconsistencies, and potential commercial bias. Significant demographic variations suggest different patient populations were evaluated. Rigorous, independently funded trials with standardized protocols are essential before clinical recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"465-473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251369316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251369316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:营养性鼻炎(AR)是一种以粘膜萎缩、结痂和粘膜纤毛清除受损为特征的慢性疾病。目前的治疗是姑息性的,不注重组织再生。尽管富血小板血浆(PRP)因其再生特性而受到关注,但支持其在AR中的有效性的证据仍然有限。目的系统评价PRP治疗AR的有效性和安全性,重点关注鼻部症状缓解、纤毛粘膜清除和组织修复生物标志物。方法系统检索PubMed和Cochrane图书馆从数据库建立到2024年9月的随机临床试验、前瞻性试验和评估PRP治疗AR的病例系列文献,使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。结果sprp治疗后鼻部症状明显改善,鼻-鼻预后测试分数由22.4分降至12.7分。四项研究显示增强黏毛清除,其中一项研究将糖精转运时间从420秒减少到220秒。生化分析显示一氧化氮合酶和精氨酸酶水平升高,表明组织再生。嗅觉缺失和鼻塞症状评分也有所改善。未观察到严重的不良反应。结论:虽然PRP对AR有希望,但目前的证据受到诊断不确定性、方法不一致和潜在的商业偏见的影响。显著的人口统计学差异表明不同的患者群体被评估。在临床推荐之前,严格的、独立资助的、具有标准化方案的试验是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Patients With Atrophic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review.

BackgroundAtrophic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic condition characterized by mucosal atrophy, crusting, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Current treatments are palliative and do not focus on tissue regeneration. Although platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention for its regenerative properties, evidence supporting its effectiveness in AR remains limited.ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PRP in the treatment of AR, focusing on nasal symptom relief, mucociliary clearance, and tissue repair biomarkers.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library from database inception to September 2024 for randomized clinical trials, prospective trials, and case series evaluating PRP for AR. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsPRP treatment resulted in significant improvements in nasal symptoms, with sino-nasal outcome test scores decreasing from 22.4 to 12.7. Four studies demonstrate enhanced mucociliary clearance, including a reduction in saccharin transit time from 420 s to 220 s in 1 study. Biochemical analyses revealed elevated levels of nitric oxide synthase and arginase, suggesting tissue regeneration. Improvements in anosmia and nasal obstruction symptom scores were also reported. No severe adverse effects were observed.ConclusionWhile PRP shows promise for AR, current evidence is compromised by diagnostic uncertainty, methodological inconsistencies, and potential commercial bias. Significant demographic variations suggest different patient populations were evaluated. Rigorous, independently funded trials with standardized protocols are essential before clinical recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信