全球初级保健抗生素处方实践及其相关因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Qihua Song, Jinxi Li, Pengfei Zhou, Rui Chen, Zhen Liu, Hui Li, Xiaoxv Yin
{"title":"全球初级保健抗生素处方实践及其相关因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Qihua Song, Jinxi Li, Pengfei Zhou, Rui Chen, Zhen Liu, Hui Li, Xiaoxv Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic prescription is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance. However, evidence on antibiotic prescription practices is inadequate globally. This study aimed to assess antibiotic prescription practices and identify its associated factors in primary care worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Global Index Medicus by WHO were searched from studies published between January 2000 and September 2023. Quantitative studies that investigated the antibiotic prescriptions practices were included in this study. Each study was assessed by at least 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Hoy tool. Quantitative studies were merged using Meta-analysis with random effects modeling. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022354143.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of antibiotic prescribing was 42.1% (95%CI [39.2%, 45.1%]). Subgroup analysis indicated that antibiotic prescribing in primary care have not changed significantly over the past 20years. The prevalence of inappropriate antibiotics prescriptions was 57.6% (95%CI [43.4%, 71.2%]). Patients with higher education levels were less likely to receive antibiotic prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed high prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in primary care, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The prevalence of antibiotic prescription has not declined significantly over the past 20years. Therefore, it is necessary to review current antimicrobial stewardship strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worldwide antibiotic prescription practices in primary care and associated factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Qihua Song, Jinxi Li, Pengfei Zhou, Rui Chen, Zhen Liu, Hui Li, Xiaoxv Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic prescription is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance. However, evidence on antibiotic prescription practices is inadequate globally. This study aimed to assess antibiotic prescription practices and identify its associated factors in primary care worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Global Index Medicus by WHO were searched from studies published between January 2000 and September 2023. Quantitative studies that investigated the antibiotic prescriptions practices were included in this study. Each study was assessed by at least 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Hoy tool. Quantitative studies were merged using Meta-analysis with random effects modeling. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022354143.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of antibiotic prescribing was 42.1% (95%CI [39.2%, 45.1%]). Subgroup analysis indicated that antibiotic prescribing in primary care have not changed significantly over the past 20years. The prevalence of inappropriate antibiotics prescriptions was 57.6% (95%CI [43.4%, 71.2%]). Patients with higher education levels were less likely to receive antibiotic prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed high prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in primary care, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The prevalence of antibiotic prescription has not declined significantly over the past 20years. Therefore, it is necessary to review current antimicrobial stewardship strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗生素处方是抗菌素耐药性的主要驱动因素,初级保健是抗生素消费的主要场所。然而,在全球范围内,关于初级保健中抗生素处方做法的证据不足。本研究旨在评估抗生素处方实践,并确定其在世界范围内的初级保健相关因素。方法:检索2000年1月1日至2023年9月30日发表的文献,检索PubMed、Embase、Web of science和WHO的全球医学索引。本研究包括调查初级保健中抗生素处方的患病率和相关因素的定量研究。每项研究都由至少两名独立评审员进行评估。使用改良的Hoy工具评估偏倚风险,并将研究分为低(7-8)、中(5-6)和高风险偏倚(0-4)。定量研究采用随机效应模型的meta分析合并。本研究注册号为PROSPERO, CRD42022354143。结果:本研究共纳入174项研究。抗生素处方的总患病率为42.1% (95%CI[39.2%, 45.1%])。在低收入和中等收入国家,抗生素处方的流行率约为50%。亚组分析表明,在过去20年中,初级保健的抗生素处方率没有显著变化。16份报告涉及抗生素处方不当的发生率,合并效应值为57.6% (95%CI[43.4%, 71.2%])。定量结果表明,受教育程度较高的患者接受抗生素处方的可能性较小。结论:在这项研究中,我们观察到初级保健中抗生素处方的高流行率,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。在过去20年中,初级保健中抗生素处方的流行率没有显著下降。因此,有必要审查目前的抗菌药物管理策略。迫切需要多部门合作和有针对性的措施,以改善全世界初级保健中的抗生素处方做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Worldwide antibiotic prescription practices in primary care and associated factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Antibiotic prescription is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance. However, evidence on antibiotic prescription practices is inadequate globally. This study aimed to assess antibiotic prescription practices and identify its associated factors in primary care worldwide.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Global Index Medicus by WHO were searched from studies published between January 2000 and September 2023. Quantitative studies that investigated the antibiotic prescriptions practices were included in this study. Each study was assessed by at least 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Hoy tool. Quantitative studies were merged using Meta-analysis with random effects modeling. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022354143.

Results: A total of 174 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of antibiotic prescribing was 42.1% (95%CI [39.2%, 45.1%]). Subgroup analysis indicated that antibiotic prescribing in primary care have not changed significantly over the past 20years. The prevalence of inappropriate antibiotics prescriptions was 57.6% (95%CI [43.4%, 71.2%]). Patients with higher education levels were less likely to receive antibiotic prescriptions.

Conclusions: We observed high prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in primary care, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The prevalence of antibiotic prescription has not declined significantly over the past 20years. Therefore, it is necessary to review current antimicrobial stewardship strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信