月骨提取:全自动髋臼月骨分割和髋角测量。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sepp De Raedt, Andreas Bentzen, Inger Mechlenburg, Maiken Stilling, Lone Rømer, Kjeld Søballe, Marleen de Bruijne
{"title":"月骨提取:全自动髋臼月骨分割和髋角测量。","authors":"Sepp De Raedt, Andreas Bentzen, Inger Mechlenburg, Maiken Stilling, Lone Rømer, Kjeld Søballe, Marleen de Bruijne","doi":"10.1177/02841851251359649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundComputed tomography (CT)-derived acetabular angles are commonly used in the diagnosis of hip dysplasia, but the measurements are labor-intensive, with higher inter- and intra-operator variation, necessitating an automated method.PurposeTo develop and validate an automatic method for segmenting the acetabular lunate surface and measure diagnostic angles using CT images to improve diagnosis and preoperative planning for patients with hip dysplasia.Material and MethodsWe developed a method to segment the acetabular lunate surface, automatically identify five landmark points (center, anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial) and calculate diagnostic angles for center-edge (CE), anterior-sector (AASA), posterior-sector (PASA), acetabular anteversion (AcAV), and acetabular-index (AI). The method was validated against repeated manual measurements by three raters on a dataset of 18 patients (36 hips).ResultsNo differences between raters and the automatic method for the center (<i>P</i> = 0.18), anterior (<i>P</i> = 0.55), posterior (<i>P</i> = 0.18), lateral (<i>P</i> = 0.13), and medial (<i>P</i> = 0.12) landmarks. No statistically significant differences were observed between raters and the automatic method for the AASA (<i>P</i> = 0.01) and PASA (<i>P</i> = 0.08) angles. Statistically significant differences were found between the automatic method and rater 3 for the CE and AI angles, and between the automatic method and rater 2 for the AcAV angle. The ICC for all angle measurements by raters and the automated method was in the range of 0.90-0.99.ConclusionWith similar agreement between manual and automatic measurements, the automatic method provides important information that may be used for both diagnosis and surgical planning, with the potential to greatly reduce the time used for analysis per patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251359649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lunate extract: fully automatic acetabular lunate segmentation and hip angle measurements.\",\"authors\":\"Sepp De Raedt, Andreas Bentzen, Inger Mechlenburg, Maiken Stilling, Lone Rømer, Kjeld Søballe, Marleen de Bruijne\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851251359649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundComputed tomography (CT)-derived acetabular angles are commonly used in the diagnosis of hip dysplasia, but the measurements are labor-intensive, with higher inter- and intra-operator variation, necessitating an automated method.PurposeTo develop and validate an automatic method for segmenting the acetabular lunate surface and measure diagnostic angles using CT images to improve diagnosis and preoperative planning for patients with hip dysplasia.Material and MethodsWe developed a method to segment the acetabular lunate surface, automatically identify five landmark points (center, anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial) and calculate diagnostic angles for center-edge (CE), anterior-sector (AASA), posterior-sector (PASA), acetabular anteversion (AcAV), and acetabular-index (AI). The method was validated against repeated manual measurements by three raters on a dataset of 18 patients (36 hips).ResultsNo differences between raters and the automatic method for the center (<i>P</i> = 0.18), anterior (<i>P</i> = 0.55), posterior (<i>P</i> = 0.18), lateral (<i>P</i> = 0.13), and medial (<i>P</i> = 0.12) landmarks. No statistically significant differences were observed between raters and the automatic method for the AASA (<i>P</i> = 0.01) and PASA (<i>P</i> = 0.08) angles. Statistically significant differences were found between the automatic method and rater 3 for the CE and AI angles, and between the automatic method and rater 2 for the AcAV angle. The ICC for all angle measurements by raters and the automated method was in the range of 0.90-0.99.ConclusionWith similar agreement between manual and automatic measurements, the automatic method provides important information that may be used for both diagnosis and surgical planning, with the potential to greatly reduce the time used for analysis per patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2841851251359649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251359649\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251359649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算机断层扫描(CT)衍生的髋臼角度通常用于诊断髋关节发育不良,但测量是劳动密集型的,操作者之间和内部的差异较大,需要一种自动化的方法。目的建立并验证一种利用CT图像自动分割髋臼月骨面并测量诊断角度的方法,以提高对髋关节发育不良患者的诊断和术前规划。材料和方法我们开发了一种方法来分割髋臼月骨面,自动识别五个标志点(中心、前、后、外侧和内侧),并计算中心边缘(CE)、前扇区(AASA)、后扇区(PASA)、髋臼前倾角(AcAV)和髋臼指数(AI)的诊断角度。该方法由三名评分员在18名患者(36髋)的数据集上重复手动测量验证。结果评分者与自动评分法在中心标志(P = 0.18)、前标志(P = 0.55)、后标志(P = 0.18)、外侧标志(P = 0.13)和内侧标志(P = 0.12)上均无差异。评分者与自动方法的AASA角度(P = 0.01)和PASA角度(P = 0.08)差异无统计学意义。在CE和AI角度上,自动方法与评分3有统计学差异,在AcAV角度上,自动方法与评分2有统计学差异。所有角度测量的ICC均在0.90-0.99之间。结论人工测量和自动测量具有相似的一致性,自动方法提供了重要的信息,可用于诊断和手术计划,有可能大大减少每个患者的分析时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lunate extract: fully automatic acetabular lunate segmentation and hip angle measurements.

BackgroundComputed tomography (CT)-derived acetabular angles are commonly used in the diagnosis of hip dysplasia, but the measurements are labor-intensive, with higher inter- and intra-operator variation, necessitating an automated method.PurposeTo develop and validate an automatic method for segmenting the acetabular lunate surface and measure diagnostic angles using CT images to improve diagnosis and preoperative planning for patients with hip dysplasia.Material and MethodsWe developed a method to segment the acetabular lunate surface, automatically identify five landmark points (center, anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial) and calculate diagnostic angles for center-edge (CE), anterior-sector (AASA), posterior-sector (PASA), acetabular anteversion (AcAV), and acetabular-index (AI). The method was validated against repeated manual measurements by three raters on a dataset of 18 patients (36 hips).ResultsNo differences between raters and the automatic method for the center (P = 0.18), anterior (P = 0.55), posterior (P = 0.18), lateral (P = 0.13), and medial (P = 0.12) landmarks. No statistically significant differences were observed between raters and the automatic method for the AASA (P = 0.01) and PASA (P = 0.08) angles. Statistically significant differences were found between the automatic method and rater 3 for the CE and AI angles, and between the automatic method and rater 2 for the AcAV angle. The ICC for all angle measurements by raters and the automated method was in the range of 0.90-0.99.ConclusionWith similar agreement between manual and automatic measurements, the automatic method provides important information that may be used for both diagnosis and surgical planning, with the potential to greatly reduce the time used for analysis per patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信