Mimmi M. S. Vedenpää, Edvard H. Sagelv, Monica Klungland Torstveit, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, John Owen Osborne
{"title":"与非运动员相比,挪威女运动员饮食失调行为的患病率较低:一项使用饮食失调检查问卷的横断面调查","authors":"Mimmi M. S. Vedenpää, Edvard H. Sagelv, Monica Klungland Torstveit, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, John Owen Osborne","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to report and compare the prevalence of disordered eating behaviours (DEBs) among Norwegian female athletes of different competition levels and sport types, and non-athletes of different physical activity levels. A total of 565 females (athletes: <i>n</i> = 189; non-athletes: <i>n</i> = 376) completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q). Athletes were categorised as recreational (<i>n</i> = 72), national (<i>n</i> = 94), or elite (<i>n</i> = 23), while non-athlete females were sedentary (<i>n</i> = 111) or physically active but non-competitive (exercisers: <i>n</i> = 265). A global EDE-Q score of > 2.5 was considered as increased risk of an eating disorder. Data were modelled using linear or logistic regression, adjusted for body mass index (BMI), age category, and education level. Global EDE-Q score was lower among recreational (mean [95% confidence interval]): (1.73 [1.31, 2.14]; <i>p</i> = 0.003; <i>d</i> = 0.50) and national-level athletes (1.89 [1.52,2.26]; <i>p</i> = 0.024; <i>d =</i> 0.39) compared to exercisers (2.47 [2.19,2.75]), with recreational athletes also scoring lower than sedentary females (2.43 [2.09,2.78]; <i>p</i> = 0.022; <i>d</i> = 0.47). Leanness focused sports had higher restraint (<i>p</i> = 0.046; <i>d =</i> 0.30) and eating concern (<i>p</i> = 0.025; <i>d</i> = 0.35) subscale scores compared to non-leanness focused sports. Recreational- or national-level athletes scored on average lower DEB symptoms using EDE-Q, compared to sedentary and physical-active non-athletes. No EDE-Q difference was found between competition levels. Leanness focused sport athletes were more concerned about eating behaviours and had higher restraint than athletes from non-leanness focused sports. These findings suggest that sport participation may be associated with lower or higher disordered eating symptoms, depending on competitive level and type of sport, highlighting the complexity of these relationships in physically active females.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower Prevalence of Disordered Eating Behaviours Among Norwegian Female Athletes Compared to Non-Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Survey Using the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Mimmi M. S. Vedenpää, Edvard H. Sagelv, Monica Klungland Torstveit, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, John Owen Osborne\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.70043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of this study was to report and compare the prevalence of disordered eating behaviours (DEBs) among Norwegian female athletes of different competition levels and sport types, and non-athletes of different physical activity levels. A total of 565 females (athletes: <i>n</i> = 189; non-athletes: <i>n</i> = 376) completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q). Athletes were categorised as recreational (<i>n</i> = 72), national (<i>n</i> = 94), or elite (<i>n</i> = 23), while non-athlete females were sedentary (<i>n</i> = 111) or physically active but non-competitive (exercisers: <i>n</i> = 265). A global EDE-Q score of > 2.5 was considered as increased risk of an eating disorder. Data were modelled using linear or logistic regression, adjusted for body mass index (BMI), age category, and education level. Global EDE-Q score was lower among recreational (mean [95% confidence interval]): (1.73 [1.31, 2.14]; <i>p</i> = 0.003; <i>d</i> = 0.50) and national-level athletes (1.89 [1.52,2.26]; <i>p</i> = 0.024; <i>d =</i> 0.39) compared to exercisers (2.47 [2.19,2.75]), with recreational athletes also scoring lower than sedentary females (2.43 [2.09,2.78]; <i>p</i> = 0.022; <i>d</i> = 0.47). Leanness focused sports had higher restraint (<i>p</i> = 0.046; <i>d =</i> 0.30) and eating concern (<i>p</i> = 0.025; <i>d</i> = 0.35) subscale scores compared to non-leanness focused sports. Recreational- or national-level athletes scored on average lower DEB symptoms using EDE-Q, compared to sedentary and physical-active non-athletes. No EDE-Q difference was found between competition levels. Leanness focused sport athletes were more concerned about eating behaviours and had higher restraint than athletes from non-leanness focused sports. These findings suggest that sport participation may be associated with lower or higher disordered eating symptoms, depending on competitive level and type of sport, highlighting the complexity of these relationships in physically active females.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70043\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是报告和比较不同竞技水平和运动类型的挪威女运动员和不同体育活动水平的非运动员中饮食失调行为(DEBs)的患病率。共有565名女性(运动员189人,非运动员376人)完成了进食障碍检查问卷6.0 (ed - q)。运动员被分为休闲类(n = 72)、国家类(n = 94)和精英类(n = 23),而非运动员的女性则是久坐不动的(n = 111)或积极运动但不竞争的(n = 265)。全球ed - q得分为2.5被认为是饮食失调的风险增加。数据采用线性或逻辑回归建模,并根据体重指数(BMI)、年龄类别和教育水平进行调整。全球ed - q评分中,休闲运动员(平均值[95%可信区间])为1.73 [1.31,2.14];p = 0.003; d = 0.50)和国家级运动员(1.89 [1.52,2.26];p = 0.024; d = 0.39)低于锻锻者(2.47[2.19,2.75]),休闲运动员得分也低于久坐不动的女性(2.43 [2.09,2.78];p = 0.022; d = 0.47)。与非以瘦为重点的运动相比,以瘦为重点的运动具有更高的克制(p = 0.046; d = 0.30)和饮食关注(p = 0.025; d = 0.35)分量表得分。与久坐不动和体力活动的非运动员相比,休闲或国家级运动员使用ed - q的平均DEB症状得分较低。在比赛水平之间没有发现ed - q差异。以瘦为重点的运动员比非以瘦为重点的运动员更关注饮食行为,并且有更高的自制力。这些研究结果表明,根据竞技水平和运动类型的不同,参加体育运动可能与较低或较高的饮食失调症状有关,突出了这些关系在体力活动的女性中的复杂性。
Lower Prevalence of Disordered Eating Behaviours Among Norwegian Female Athletes Compared to Non-Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Survey Using the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire
The purpose of this study was to report and compare the prevalence of disordered eating behaviours (DEBs) among Norwegian female athletes of different competition levels and sport types, and non-athletes of different physical activity levels. A total of 565 females (athletes: n = 189; non-athletes: n = 376) completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q). Athletes were categorised as recreational (n = 72), national (n = 94), or elite (n = 23), while non-athlete females were sedentary (n = 111) or physically active but non-competitive (exercisers: n = 265). A global EDE-Q score of > 2.5 was considered as increased risk of an eating disorder. Data were modelled using linear or logistic regression, adjusted for body mass index (BMI), age category, and education level. Global EDE-Q score was lower among recreational (mean [95% confidence interval]): (1.73 [1.31, 2.14]; p = 0.003; d = 0.50) and national-level athletes (1.89 [1.52,2.26]; p = 0.024; d = 0.39) compared to exercisers (2.47 [2.19,2.75]), with recreational athletes also scoring lower than sedentary females (2.43 [2.09,2.78]; p = 0.022; d = 0.47). Leanness focused sports had higher restraint (p = 0.046; d = 0.30) and eating concern (p = 0.025; d = 0.35) subscale scores compared to non-leanness focused sports. Recreational- or national-level athletes scored on average lower DEB symptoms using EDE-Q, compared to sedentary and physical-active non-athletes. No EDE-Q difference was found between competition levels. Leanness focused sport athletes were more concerned about eating behaviours and had higher restraint than athletes from non-leanness focused sports. These findings suggest that sport participation may be associated with lower or higher disordered eating symptoms, depending on competitive level and type of sport, highlighting the complexity of these relationships in physically active females.