Kenneth Deprez, Bram Stroobandt, Adriana Fernandes Veludo, Zsuzsanna Vecsei, Peter Pal Necz, Piotr Politański, Leen Verloock, Kinga Polanska, György Thuróczy, Martin Röösli, David Plets, Wout Joseph
{"title":"四个欧洲国家的5G射频电磁场频谱暴露评估","authors":"Kenneth Deprez, Bram Stroobandt, Adriana Fernandes Veludo, Zsuzsanna Vecsei, Peter Pal Necz, Piotr Politański, Leen Verloock, Kinga Polanska, György Thuróczy, Martin Röösli, David Plets, Wout Joseph","doi":"10.1002/bem.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assesses the exposure to 5G radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) across four European countries. Spot measurements were conducted indoor and outdoor in both public spaces and educational institutions, encompassing urban and rural environments. In total, 146 measurements were performed in 2023, divided over Belgium (47), Switzerland (38), Hungary (30) and Poland (31). At 34.9% of all measurement locations a 5G connection to 3.6 GHz was established. The average cumulative incident power density (<i>S</i><sub>avg</sub>) and maximum cumulative incident power density (<i>S</i><sub>max</sub>) were determined, for both “background” exposure (no 5G user equipment; No UE) and worst-case exposure (maximum downlink with 5G user equipment; Max DL). Furthermore, 3.6 GHz 5G-specific average <i>S</i><sub>avg,5G</sub> and maximum <i>S</i><sub>max,</sub><sub>5G</sub> incident power density are considered as well. For the No UE scenario, the highest <i>S</i><sub>max</sub> is 17.6 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, while for the Max DL, the highest <i>S</i><sub>max</sub> is 23.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Both values are well within the ICNIRP guidelines. The highest <i>S</i><sub>max,</sub><sub>5G</sub> measured over all countries and scenarios was 10.4 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, which is 3.2% of the frequency-specific ICNIRP guidelines. Additionally, a comparison was made between big cities, secondary cities, and villages for all four countries. The ratio of power density measured in rural areas was significantly lower than in urban areas (−4.8 to −10.4 dB). Under LOS conditions, the average incident power density was 2.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas under NLOS conditions, the average incident power density decreases to 0.9 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Furthermore, the relative variation increases under NLOS scenarios. Lastly, an analysis was performed regarding the power density in educational institutions compared to all other measurement locations, both indoors and outdoors for the different city types. The measured incident power density is not extensively lower in or around schools compared to public places, neither in the big cities, secondary cities, or the villages.</p>","PeriodicalId":8956,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectromagnetics","volume":"46 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bem.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5G RF EMF Spectral Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Deprez, Bram Stroobandt, Adriana Fernandes Veludo, Zsuzsanna Vecsei, Peter Pal Necz, Piotr Politański, Leen Verloock, Kinga Polanska, György Thuróczy, Martin Röösli, David Plets, Wout Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bem.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study assesses the exposure to 5G radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) across four European countries. Spot measurements were conducted indoor and outdoor in both public spaces and educational institutions, encompassing urban and rural environments. In total, 146 measurements were performed in 2023, divided over Belgium (47), Switzerland (38), Hungary (30) and Poland (31). At 34.9% of all measurement locations a 5G connection to 3.6 GHz was established. The average cumulative incident power density (<i>S</i><sub>avg</sub>) and maximum cumulative incident power density (<i>S</i><sub>max</sub>) were determined, for both “background” exposure (no 5G user equipment; No UE) and worst-case exposure (maximum downlink with 5G user equipment; Max DL). Furthermore, 3.6 GHz 5G-specific average <i>S</i><sub>avg,5G</sub> and maximum <i>S</i><sub>max,</sub><sub>5G</sub> incident power density are considered as well. For the No UE scenario, the highest <i>S</i><sub>max</sub> is 17.6 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, while for the Max DL, the highest <i>S</i><sub>max</sub> is 23.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Both values are well within the ICNIRP guidelines. The highest <i>S</i><sub>max,</sub><sub>5G</sub> measured over all countries and scenarios was 10.4 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, which is 3.2% of the frequency-specific ICNIRP guidelines. Additionally, a comparison was made between big cities, secondary cities, and villages for all four countries. The ratio of power density measured in rural areas was significantly lower than in urban areas (−4.8 to −10.4 dB). Under LOS conditions, the average incident power density was 2.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas under NLOS conditions, the average incident power density decreases to 0.9 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Furthermore, the relative variation increases under NLOS scenarios. Lastly, an analysis was performed regarding the power density in educational institutions compared to all other measurement locations, both indoors and outdoors for the different city types. The measured incident power density is not extensively lower in or around schools compared to public places, neither in the big cities, secondary cities, or the villages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioelectromagnetics\",\"volume\":\"46 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bem.70019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioelectromagnetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.70019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
5G RF EMF Spectral Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries
This study assesses the exposure to 5G radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) across four European countries. Spot measurements were conducted indoor and outdoor in both public spaces and educational institutions, encompassing urban and rural environments. In total, 146 measurements were performed in 2023, divided over Belgium (47), Switzerland (38), Hungary (30) and Poland (31). At 34.9% of all measurement locations a 5G connection to 3.6 GHz was established. The average cumulative incident power density (Savg) and maximum cumulative incident power density (Smax) were determined, for both “background” exposure (no 5G user equipment; No UE) and worst-case exposure (maximum downlink with 5G user equipment; Max DL). Furthermore, 3.6 GHz 5G-specific average Savg,5G and maximum Smax,5G incident power density are considered as well. For the No UE scenario, the highest Smax is 17.6 mW/m2, while for the Max DL, the highest Smax is 23.3 mW/m2. Both values are well within the ICNIRP guidelines. The highest Smax,5G measured over all countries and scenarios was 10.4 mW/m2, which is 3.2% of the frequency-specific ICNIRP guidelines. Additionally, a comparison was made between big cities, secondary cities, and villages for all four countries. The ratio of power density measured in rural areas was significantly lower than in urban areas (−4.8 to −10.4 dB). Under LOS conditions, the average incident power density was 2.3 mW/m2, whereas under NLOS conditions, the average incident power density decreases to 0.9 mW/m2. Furthermore, the relative variation increases under NLOS scenarios. Lastly, an analysis was performed regarding the power density in educational institutions compared to all other measurement locations, both indoors and outdoors for the different city types. The measured incident power density is not extensively lower in or around schools compared to public places, neither in the big cities, secondary cities, or the villages.
期刊介绍:
Bioelectromagnetics is published by Wiley-Liss, Inc., for the Bioelectromagnetics Society and is the official journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association. It is a peer-reviewed, internationally circulated scientific journal that specializes in reporting original data on biological effects and applications of electromagnetic fields that range in frequency from zero hertz (static fields) to the terahertz undulations and visible light. Both experimental and clinical data are of interest to the journal''s readers as are theoretical papers or reviews that offer novel insights into or criticism of contemporary concepts and theories of field-body interactions. The Bioelectromagnetics Society, which sponsors the journal, also welcomes experimental or clinical papers on the domains of sonic and ultrasonic radiation.