四个欧洲国家的5G射频电磁场频谱暴露评估

IF 1.2 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Kenneth Deprez, Bram Stroobandt, Adriana Fernandes Veludo, Zsuzsanna Vecsei, Peter Pal Necz, Piotr Politański, Leen Verloock, Kinga Polanska, György Thuróczy, Martin Röösli, David Plets, Wout Joseph
{"title":"四个欧洲国家的5G射频电磁场频谱暴露评估","authors":"Kenneth Deprez,&nbsp;Bram Stroobandt,&nbsp;Adriana Fernandes Veludo,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna Vecsei,&nbsp;Peter Pal Necz,&nbsp;Piotr Politański,&nbsp;Leen Verloock,&nbsp;Kinga Polanska,&nbsp;György Thuróczy,&nbsp;Martin Röösli,&nbsp;David Plets,&nbsp;Wout Joseph","doi":"10.1002/bem.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assesses the exposure to 5G radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) across four European countries. Spot measurements were conducted indoor and outdoor in both public spaces and educational institutions, encompassing urban and rural environments. In total, 146 measurements were performed in 2023, divided over Belgium (47), Switzerland (38), Hungary (30) and Poland (31). At 34.9% of all measurement locations a 5G connection to 3.6 GHz was established. The average cumulative incident power density (<i>S</i><sub>avg</sub>) and maximum cumulative incident power density (<i>S</i><sub>max</sub>) were determined, for both “background” exposure (no 5G user equipment; No UE) and worst-case exposure (maximum downlink with 5G user equipment; Max DL). Furthermore, 3.6 GHz 5G-specific average <i>S</i><sub>avg,5G</sub> and maximum <i>S</i><sub>max,</sub><sub>5G</sub> incident power density are considered as well. For the No UE scenario, the highest <i>S</i><sub>max</sub> is 17.6 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, while for the Max DL, the highest <i>S</i><sub>max</sub> is 23.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Both values are well within the ICNIRP guidelines. The highest <i>S</i><sub>max,</sub><sub>5G</sub> measured over all countries and scenarios was 10.4 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, which is 3.2% of the frequency-specific ICNIRP guidelines. Additionally, a comparison was made between big cities, secondary cities, and villages for all four countries. The ratio of power density measured in rural areas was significantly lower than in urban areas (−4.8 to −10.4 dB). Under LOS conditions, the average incident power density was 2.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas under NLOS conditions, the average incident power density decreases to 0.9 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Furthermore, the relative variation increases under NLOS scenarios. Lastly, an analysis was performed regarding the power density in educational institutions compared to all other measurement locations, both indoors and outdoors for the different city types. The measured incident power density is not extensively lower in or around schools compared to public places, neither in the big cities, secondary cities, or the villages.</p>","PeriodicalId":8956,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectromagnetics","volume":"46 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bem.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5G RF EMF Spectral Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Deprez,&nbsp;Bram Stroobandt,&nbsp;Adriana Fernandes Veludo,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna Vecsei,&nbsp;Peter Pal Necz,&nbsp;Piotr Politański,&nbsp;Leen Verloock,&nbsp;Kinga Polanska,&nbsp;György Thuróczy,&nbsp;Martin Röösli,&nbsp;David Plets,&nbsp;Wout Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bem.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study assesses the exposure to 5G radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) across four European countries. Spot measurements were conducted indoor and outdoor in both public spaces and educational institutions, encompassing urban and rural environments. In total, 146 measurements were performed in 2023, divided over Belgium (47), Switzerland (38), Hungary (30) and Poland (31). At 34.9% of all measurement locations a 5G connection to 3.6 GHz was established. The average cumulative incident power density (<i>S</i><sub>avg</sub>) and maximum cumulative incident power density (<i>S</i><sub>max</sub>) were determined, for both “background” exposure (no 5G user equipment; No UE) and worst-case exposure (maximum downlink with 5G user equipment; Max DL). Furthermore, 3.6 GHz 5G-specific average <i>S</i><sub>avg,5G</sub> and maximum <i>S</i><sub>max,</sub><sub>5G</sub> incident power density are considered as well. For the No UE scenario, the highest <i>S</i><sub>max</sub> is 17.6 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, while for the Max DL, the highest <i>S</i><sub>max</sub> is 23.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Both values are well within the ICNIRP guidelines. The highest <i>S</i><sub>max,</sub><sub>5G</sub> measured over all countries and scenarios was 10.4 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, which is 3.2% of the frequency-specific ICNIRP guidelines. Additionally, a comparison was made between big cities, secondary cities, and villages for all four countries. The ratio of power density measured in rural areas was significantly lower than in urban areas (−4.8 to −10.4 dB). Under LOS conditions, the average incident power density was 2.3 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas under NLOS conditions, the average incident power density decreases to 0.9 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Furthermore, the relative variation increases under NLOS scenarios. Lastly, an analysis was performed regarding the power density in educational institutions compared to all other measurement locations, both indoors and outdoors for the different city types. The measured incident power density is not extensively lower in or around schools compared to public places, neither in the big cities, secondary cities, or the villages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioelectromagnetics\",\"volume\":\"46 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bem.70019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioelectromagnetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.70019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究评估了四个欧洲国家的5G射频电磁场(RF EMF)暴露情况。现场测量在公共空间和教育机构的室内和室外进行,包括城市和农村环境。2023年总共进行了146次测量,分别在比利时(47次)、瑞士(38次)、匈牙利(30次)和波兰(31次)进行。在所有测量地点的34.9%建立了3.6 GHz的5G连接。确定了“背景”曝光(无5G用户设备;无UE)和最坏情况曝光(5G用户设备最大下行链路;最大DL)的平均累积入射功率密度(Savg)和最大累积入射功率密度(Smax)。此外,还考虑了3.6 GHz 5G特定平均Savg、5G和最大Smax、5G入射功率密度。No UE情景最大Smax为17.6 mW/m2, Max DL情景最大Smax为23.3 mW/m2。这两个值都完全符合ICNIRP的指导方针。在所有国家和场景中测量的5G最高Smax为10.4 mW/m2,这是特定频率ICNIRP指南的3.2%。此外,还对这四个国家的大城市、二线城市和乡村进行了比较。农村地区测得的功率密度比显著低于城市地区(- 4.8 dB至- 10.4 dB)。在LOS条件下,平均入射功率密度为2.3 mW/m2,而在NLOS条件下,平均入射功率密度降至0.9 mW/m2。此外,在NLOS情景下,相对变化增加。最后,对不同城市类型的教育机构与所有其他测量地点(室内和室外)的功率密度进行了分析。实测的入射功率密度在学校内或学校周围并没有明显低于公共场所,无论是在大城市、二线城市还是农村。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

5G RF EMF Spectral Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries

5G RF EMF Spectral Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries

This study assesses the exposure to 5G radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) across four European countries. Spot measurements were conducted indoor and outdoor in both public spaces and educational institutions, encompassing urban and rural environments. In total, 146 measurements were performed in 2023, divided over Belgium (47), Switzerland (38), Hungary (30) and Poland (31). At 34.9% of all measurement locations a 5G connection to 3.6 GHz was established. The average cumulative incident power density (Savg) and maximum cumulative incident power density (Smax) were determined, for both “background” exposure (no 5G user equipment; No UE) and worst-case exposure (maximum downlink with 5G user equipment; Max DL). Furthermore, 3.6 GHz 5G-specific average Savg,5G and maximum Smax,5G incident power density are considered as well. For the No UE scenario, the highest Smax is 17.6 mW/m2, while for the Max DL, the highest Smax is 23.3 mW/m2. Both values are well within the ICNIRP guidelines. The highest Smax,5G measured over all countries and scenarios was 10.4 mW/m2, which is 3.2% of the frequency-specific ICNIRP guidelines. Additionally, a comparison was made between big cities, secondary cities, and villages for all four countries. The ratio of power density measured in rural areas was significantly lower than in urban areas (−4.8 to −10.4 dB). Under LOS conditions, the average incident power density was 2.3 mW/m2, whereas under NLOS conditions, the average incident power density decreases to 0.9 mW/m2. Furthermore, the relative variation increases under NLOS scenarios. Lastly, an analysis was performed regarding the power density in educational institutions compared to all other measurement locations, both indoors and outdoors for the different city types. The measured incident power density is not extensively lower in or around schools compared to public places, neither in the big cities, secondary cities, or the villages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioelectromagnetics
Bioelectromagnetics 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioelectromagnetics is published by Wiley-Liss, Inc., for the Bioelectromagnetics Society and is the official journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association. It is a peer-reviewed, internationally circulated scientific journal that specializes in reporting original data on biological effects and applications of electromagnetic fields that range in frequency from zero hertz (static fields) to the terahertz undulations and visible light. Both experimental and clinical data are of interest to the journal''s readers as are theoretical papers or reviews that offer novel insights into or criticism of contemporary concepts and theories of field-body interactions. The Bioelectromagnetics Society, which sponsors the journal, also welcomes experimental or clinical papers on the domains of sonic and ultrasonic radiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信