基于鄱阳湖流域地下水长期储存模拟的地下水干旱识别与恢复

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Yang Zhang, Runrun Zhang, Miaomiao Ma, Qingyue Bu
{"title":"基于鄱阳湖流域地下水长期储存模拟的地下水干旱识别与恢复","authors":"Yang Zhang,&nbsp;Runrun Zhang,&nbsp;Miaomiao Ma,&nbsp;Qingyue Bu","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Groundwater droughts pose a significant threat to global water security, leading to critical shortages in groundwater resources and exacerbating ecological degradation. Despite the significant implications of droughts, the influence of climatic and vegetation factors on characteristics of drought recovery remains poorly understood. In this study, long-term monthly aquifer groundwater storage processes from 1983 to 2019 were estimated by employing the VIC-SIMGM model across seven sub-basins in Poyang Lake basin, with multiscale validation according to monitoring wells and GRACE data. Then, catchment groundwater droughts were identified using the standardised groundwater storage drought index. Results indicate that the 7 sub-basins experienced 15–21 groundwater droughts from 1983 to 2019, with the longest and most severe droughts occurring between 2003 and 2010 across all sub-basins. Furthermore, drought recovery times and speeds were calculated, revealing that the average recovery time ranged from 5.05 to 9.93 months, and average recovery speeds ranged from 0.14 to 0.36. The Ganjiang and Fuhe River basins experienced relatively shorter recovery times and faster recovery speeds, while the Changjiang River basin exhibited the most severe droughts with the slowest recovery process. Through correlation analysis, we evaluated the effects of climatic and vegetation factors during the recovery period—including precipitation (P), soil moisture anomalies (SMA), the climate moisture index (CMI), and NDVI—on the characteristics of drought recovery. We found that precipitation has a limited direct influence on drought recovery, while indirect surface regulation processes, particularly SMA and CMI, play a more dominant role. Higher SMA and CMI values are associated with increased recovery speeds and shorter recovery durations. In contrast, higher NDVI values are linked to prolonged recovery periods, suggesting that vigorous vegetation growth may hinder groundwater recharge. The results provide valuable information for long-term groundwater drought identification and highlight the critical role of soil moisture and climate moisture in groundwater drought recovery.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Groundwater Droughts and Its Recovery Based on Long-Term Groundwater Storage Simulation in Catchments Across Poyang Lake Basin\",\"authors\":\"Yang Zhang,&nbsp;Runrun Zhang,&nbsp;Miaomiao Ma,&nbsp;Qingyue Bu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.70248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Groundwater droughts pose a significant threat to global water security, leading to critical shortages in groundwater resources and exacerbating ecological degradation. Despite the significant implications of droughts, the influence of climatic and vegetation factors on characteristics of drought recovery remains poorly understood. In this study, long-term monthly aquifer groundwater storage processes from 1983 to 2019 were estimated by employing the VIC-SIMGM model across seven sub-basins in Poyang Lake basin, with multiscale validation according to monitoring wells and GRACE data. Then, catchment groundwater droughts were identified using the standardised groundwater storage drought index. Results indicate that the 7 sub-basins experienced 15–21 groundwater droughts from 1983 to 2019, with the longest and most severe droughts occurring between 2003 and 2010 across all sub-basins. Furthermore, drought recovery times and speeds were calculated, revealing that the average recovery time ranged from 5.05 to 9.93 months, and average recovery speeds ranged from 0.14 to 0.36. The Ganjiang and Fuhe River basins experienced relatively shorter recovery times and faster recovery speeds, while the Changjiang River basin exhibited the most severe droughts with the slowest recovery process. Through correlation analysis, we evaluated the effects of climatic and vegetation factors during the recovery period—including precipitation (P), soil moisture anomalies (SMA), the climate moisture index (CMI), and NDVI—on the characteristics of drought recovery. We found that precipitation has a limited direct influence on drought recovery, while indirect surface regulation processes, particularly SMA and CMI, play a more dominant role. Higher SMA and CMI values are associated with increased recovery speeds and shorter recovery durations. In contrast, higher NDVI values are linked to prolonged recovery periods, suggesting that vigorous vegetation growth may hinder groundwater recharge. The results provide valuable information for long-term groundwater drought identification and highlight the critical role of soil moisture and climate moisture in groundwater drought recovery.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"39 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下水干旱对全球水安全构成重大威胁,导致地下水资源严重短缺,加剧生态退化。尽管干旱具有重大影响,但气候和植被因素对干旱恢复特征的影响仍然知之甚少。本研究采用VIC-SIMGM模型,对鄱阳湖流域7个子流域1983 - 2019年的长期月蓄水过程进行了估算,并根据监测井和GRACE数据进行了多尺度验证。然后,利用标准化地下水蓄水干旱指数对流域地下水干旱进行识别。结果表明:1983 - 2019年7个子流域共经历了15 ~ 21次地下水干旱,其中2003 ~ 2010年干旱时间最长、最严重;结果表明,平均恢复时间为5.05 ~ 9.93个月,平均恢复速度为0.14 ~ 0.36个月。赣江和抚河流域恢复时间相对较短,恢复速度较快,长江流域干旱最严重,恢复速度最慢。通过相关分析,评价了恢复期气候和植被因子(包括降水(P)、土壤水分异常(SMA)、气候水分指数(CMI)和ndvi)对干旱恢复特征的影响。研究发现,降水对干旱恢复的直接影响有限,而以SMA和CMI为代表的间接地表调节过程起着更大的作用。SMA和CMI值越高,恢复速度越快,恢复时间越短。相反,较高的NDVI值与较长的恢复期有关,这表明旺盛的植被生长可能阻碍地下水补给。研究结果为地下水干旱的长期识别提供了有价值的信息,并突出了土壤湿度和气候湿度在地下水干旱恢复中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identifying Groundwater Droughts and Its Recovery Based on Long-Term Groundwater Storage Simulation in Catchments Across Poyang Lake Basin

Identifying Groundwater Droughts and Its Recovery Based on Long-Term Groundwater Storage Simulation in Catchments Across Poyang Lake Basin

Groundwater droughts pose a significant threat to global water security, leading to critical shortages in groundwater resources and exacerbating ecological degradation. Despite the significant implications of droughts, the influence of climatic and vegetation factors on characteristics of drought recovery remains poorly understood. In this study, long-term monthly aquifer groundwater storage processes from 1983 to 2019 were estimated by employing the VIC-SIMGM model across seven sub-basins in Poyang Lake basin, with multiscale validation according to monitoring wells and GRACE data. Then, catchment groundwater droughts were identified using the standardised groundwater storage drought index. Results indicate that the 7 sub-basins experienced 15–21 groundwater droughts from 1983 to 2019, with the longest and most severe droughts occurring between 2003 and 2010 across all sub-basins. Furthermore, drought recovery times and speeds were calculated, revealing that the average recovery time ranged from 5.05 to 9.93 months, and average recovery speeds ranged from 0.14 to 0.36. The Ganjiang and Fuhe River basins experienced relatively shorter recovery times and faster recovery speeds, while the Changjiang River basin exhibited the most severe droughts with the slowest recovery process. Through correlation analysis, we evaluated the effects of climatic and vegetation factors during the recovery period—including precipitation (P), soil moisture anomalies (SMA), the climate moisture index (CMI), and NDVI—on the characteristics of drought recovery. We found that precipitation has a limited direct influence on drought recovery, while indirect surface regulation processes, particularly SMA and CMI, play a more dominant role. Higher SMA and CMI values are associated with increased recovery speeds and shorter recovery durations. In contrast, higher NDVI values are linked to prolonged recovery periods, suggesting that vigorous vegetation growth may hinder groundwater recharge. The results provide valuable information for long-term groundwater drought identification and highlight the critical role of soil moisture and climate moisture in groundwater drought recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信