心理健康康复支持:来自家庭视角的德尔菲研究

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Estefania Guerrero, Maite Barrios, Hernán María Sampietro, Alba Aza, Juana Gómez-Benito, Georgina Guilera
{"title":"心理健康康复支持:来自家庭视角的德尔菲研究","authors":"Estefania Guerrero,&nbsp;Maite Barrios,&nbsp;Hernán María Sampietro,&nbsp;Alba Aza,&nbsp;Juana Gómez-Benito,&nbsp;Georgina Guilera","doi":"10.1111/inm.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mental health services are increasingly adopting a recovery-oriented approach that prioritises human rights and user empowerment. In this evolving landscape, family members, who are often the primary support network for mental health service users, face unique challenges in assisting a person's recovery. This study aims to establish an international consensus on supportive actions for the recovery process and to identify key facilitators and obstacles to providing support from the perspective of families of mental health service users. Methodological rigour was ensured by following the CREDES checklist. A total of 53 family caregivers from around the world agreed to participate in a three-round e-Delphi study. Consensus was reached on 47 statements detailing supportive actions, among which an awareness of the user's needs was considered the most important. The study also identified 42 facilitators of providing support, with openness to learning and trusting the user being the most significant. A total of 23 obstacles were also acknowledged, with the major barrier being the emotional or physical absence of the caregiver. These results highlight the multifaceted nature of support and the critical role families play in a person's recovery journey. The findings also underscore the need for training programmes based on these consensus statements so as to empower families to provide more effective and person-centred support.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70119","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Support for Recovery in Mental Health: A Delphi Study From the Family's Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Estefania Guerrero,&nbsp;Maite Barrios,&nbsp;Hernán María Sampietro,&nbsp;Alba Aza,&nbsp;Juana Gómez-Benito,&nbsp;Georgina Guilera\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.70119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mental health services are increasingly adopting a recovery-oriented approach that prioritises human rights and user empowerment. In this evolving landscape, family members, who are often the primary support network for mental health service users, face unique challenges in assisting a person's recovery. This study aims to establish an international consensus on supportive actions for the recovery process and to identify key facilitators and obstacles to providing support from the perspective of families of mental health service users. Methodological rigour was ensured by following the CREDES checklist. A total of 53 family caregivers from around the world agreed to participate in a three-round e-Delphi study. Consensus was reached on 47 statements detailing supportive actions, among which an awareness of the user's needs was considered the most important. The study also identified 42 facilitators of providing support, with openness to learning and trusting the user being the most significant. A total of 23 obstacles were also acknowledged, with the major barrier being the emotional or physical absence of the caregiver. These results highlight the multifaceted nature of support and the critical role families play in a person's recovery journey. The findings also underscore the need for training programmes based on these consensus statements so as to empower families to provide more effective and person-centred support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70119\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理健康服务越来越多地采用注重康复的方法,优先考虑人权和赋予使用者权力。在这种不断变化的情况下,家庭成员往往是精神卫生服务使用者的主要支持网络,他们在帮助一个人康复方面面临着独特的挑战。本研究旨在就康复过程的支持行动建立国际共识,并从精神卫生服务使用者家庭的角度确定提供支持的主要促进因素和障碍。通过遵循CREDES检查表确保了方法的严谨性。来自世界各地的53名家庭照顾者同意参加一项三轮e-Delphi研究。就详细说明支助行动的47项声明达成了协商一致意见,其中认为最重要的是认识到用户的需要。该研究还确定了42个提供支持的促进因素,其中对学习的开放和对用户的信任是最重要的。共有23个障碍也被承认,主要障碍是照顾者在情感或身体上的缺席。这些结果强调了支持的多面性,以及家庭在一个人的康复过程中发挥的关键作用。调查结果还强调需要根据这些协商一致意见声明制定培训方案,以便使家庭能够提供更有效和以人为本的支助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Support for Recovery in Mental Health: A Delphi Study From the Family's Perspective

Support for Recovery in Mental Health: A Delphi Study From the Family's Perspective

Mental health services are increasingly adopting a recovery-oriented approach that prioritises human rights and user empowerment. In this evolving landscape, family members, who are often the primary support network for mental health service users, face unique challenges in assisting a person's recovery. This study aims to establish an international consensus on supportive actions for the recovery process and to identify key facilitators and obstacles to providing support from the perspective of families of mental health service users. Methodological rigour was ensured by following the CREDES checklist. A total of 53 family caregivers from around the world agreed to participate in a three-round e-Delphi study. Consensus was reached on 47 statements detailing supportive actions, among which an awareness of the user's needs was considered the most important. The study also identified 42 facilitators of providing support, with openness to learning and trusting the user being the most significant. A total of 23 obstacles were also acknowledged, with the major barrier being the emotional or physical absence of the caregiver. These results highlight the multifaceted nature of support and the critical role families play in a person's recovery journey. The findings also underscore the need for training programmes based on these consensus statements so as to empower families to provide more effective and person-centred support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信