Laura L. Griffin, Laura Finnegan, Julie Duval, Simone Ciuti, Virginia Morera-Pujol, Haitao Li, A. Cole Burton
{"title":"脆弱的北美驯鹿和驼鹿种群对山松甲虫的爆发和管理表现出不同的反应","authors":"Laura L. Griffin, Laura Finnegan, Julie Duval, Simone Ciuti, Virginia Morera-Pujol, Haitao Li, A. Cole Burton","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rising global temperatures and changing landscape conditions have led to widespread mountain pine beetle (<i>Dendroctonus ponderosae</i>) outbreaks in western North America. Pine beetle management is typically implemented to mitigate economic losses, but its effects on wildlife, particularly ecologically important species like caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus</i>) and moose (<i>Alces alces</i>), warrant greater attention. We assessed the effects of early-stage pine beetle infestation, timber harvest, and fire on habitat selection by caribou (boreal and central mountain designatable units) and moose in west-central Alberta, Canada. Using global positioning system (GPS) collar data collected 3–5 years after infestation, we developed resource selection functions and functional response models. Caribou exhibited seasonally variable responses, generally avoiding pine beetle-affected areas in winter but selecting them in summer. They also avoided harvested and burned areas, though this avoidance depended on overall disturbance levels within their ranges. Moose displayed sex-specific responses to pine beetle infestations and associated management: females avoided pine beetle-affected areas but selected burned sites year-round, while males showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that pine beetle disturbances may negatively affect caribou and female moose winter habitat availability while simultaneously enhancing conditions for male moose. Further research is needed to disentangle the individual and cumulative effects of pine beetle management actions versus general timber harvests and wildfires, as these disturbances may be compounding rather than acting in isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vulnerable caribou and moose populations display varying responses to mountain pine beetle outbreaks and management\",\"authors\":\"Laura L. Griffin, Laura Finnegan, Julie Duval, Simone Ciuti, Virginia Morera-Pujol, Haitao Li, A. Cole Burton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rising global temperatures and changing landscape conditions have led to widespread mountain pine beetle (<i>Dendroctonus ponderosae</i>) outbreaks in western North America. Pine beetle management is typically implemented to mitigate economic losses, but its effects on wildlife, particularly ecologically important species like caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus</i>) and moose (<i>Alces alces</i>), warrant greater attention. We assessed the effects of early-stage pine beetle infestation, timber harvest, and fire on habitat selection by caribou (boreal and central mountain designatable units) and moose in west-central Alberta, Canada. Using global positioning system (GPS) collar data collected 3–5 years after infestation, we developed resource selection functions and functional response models. Caribou exhibited seasonally variable responses, generally avoiding pine beetle-affected areas in winter but selecting them in summer. They also avoided harvested and burned areas, though this avoidance depended on overall disturbance levels within their ranges. Moose displayed sex-specific responses to pine beetle infestations and associated management: females avoided pine beetle-affected areas but selected burned sites year-round, while males showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that pine beetle disturbances may negatively affect caribou and female moose winter habitat availability while simultaneously enhancing conditions for male moose. Further research is needed to disentangle the individual and cumulative effects of pine beetle management actions versus general timber harvests and wildfires, as these disturbances may be compounding rather than acting in isolation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"89 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vulnerable caribou and moose populations display varying responses to mountain pine beetle outbreaks and management
Rising global temperatures and changing landscape conditions have led to widespread mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreaks in western North America. Pine beetle management is typically implemented to mitigate economic losses, but its effects on wildlife, particularly ecologically important species like caribou (Rangifer tarandus) and moose (Alces alces), warrant greater attention. We assessed the effects of early-stage pine beetle infestation, timber harvest, and fire on habitat selection by caribou (boreal and central mountain designatable units) and moose in west-central Alberta, Canada. Using global positioning system (GPS) collar data collected 3–5 years after infestation, we developed resource selection functions and functional response models. Caribou exhibited seasonally variable responses, generally avoiding pine beetle-affected areas in winter but selecting them in summer. They also avoided harvested and burned areas, though this avoidance depended on overall disturbance levels within their ranges. Moose displayed sex-specific responses to pine beetle infestations and associated management: females avoided pine beetle-affected areas but selected burned sites year-round, while males showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that pine beetle disturbances may negatively affect caribou and female moose winter habitat availability while simultaneously enhancing conditions for male moose. Further research is needed to disentangle the individual and cumulative effects of pine beetle management actions versus general timber harvests and wildfires, as these disturbances may be compounding rather than acting in isolation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.