{"title":"东部沙丘鹤种群管理的可持续收获估算","authors":"Michael Wells, Thomas R. Cooper","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Eastern Population of sandhill cranes has expanded rapidly from near extirpation in the early twentieth century. Rapid population recovery and range expansion have resulted in the increased take of the Eastern Population through crop depredation permits and hunting. To provide a better biological foundation for managing the Eastern Population, the management community desired a scientifically informed evaluation of take to maximize the protection and use of this species for 3 major purposes: wildlife viewing, control of crop depredation, and sport hunting. We used a prescribed take approach, which uses data from population, demographic, and management parameter estimates to determine the allowable take. Furthermore, we used 2 different methods of estimating growth rates to control for demographic uncertainties. We estimated a maximum growth rate of 0.092 to 0.123 for demographically informed and demographically invariant methods, respectively. Depending on management objectives, median take ranged from 3,123 birds at a low take management goal to 6,245 at the maximum sustained yield management goal. We found that this species can sustain current reported take and likely can sustain additional take if needed. Owing to inherent differences in productivity, driven by small clutch size and lower fledging success, sandhill cranes need to be more closely monitored for take compared to more fecund species.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating sustainable harvest for the management of the eastern population of sandhill cranes (Antigone canadensis tabida)\",\"authors\":\"Michael Wells, Thomas R. Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.70075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Eastern Population of sandhill cranes has expanded rapidly from near extirpation in the early twentieth century. Rapid population recovery and range expansion have resulted in the increased take of the Eastern Population through crop depredation permits and hunting. To provide a better biological foundation for managing the Eastern Population, the management community desired a scientifically informed evaluation of take to maximize the protection and use of this species for 3 major purposes: wildlife viewing, control of crop depredation, and sport hunting. We used a prescribed take approach, which uses data from population, demographic, and management parameter estimates to determine the allowable take. Furthermore, we used 2 different methods of estimating growth rates to control for demographic uncertainties. We estimated a maximum growth rate of 0.092 to 0.123 for demographically informed and demographically invariant methods, respectively. Depending on management objectives, median take ranged from 3,123 birds at a low take management goal to 6,245 at the maximum sustained yield management goal. We found that this species can sustain current reported take and likely can sustain additional take if needed. Owing to inherent differences in productivity, driven by small clutch size and lower fledging success, sandhill cranes need to be more closely monitored for take compared to more fecund species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"89 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70075\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating sustainable harvest for the management of the eastern population of sandhill cranes (Antigone canadensis tabida)
The Eastern Population of sandhill cranes has expanded rapidly from near extirpation in the early twentieth century. Rapid population recovery and range expansion have resulted in the increased take of the Eastern Population through crop depredation permits and hunting. To provide a better biological foundation for managing the Eastern Population, the management community desired a scientifically informed evaluation of take to maximize the protection and use of this species for 3 major purposes: wildlife viewing, control of crop depredation, and sport hunting. We used a prescribed take approach, which uses data from population, demographic, and management parameter estimates to determine the allowable take. Furthermore, we used 2 different methods of estimating growth rates to control for demographic uncertainties. We estimated a maximum growth rate of 0.092 to 0.123 for demographically informed and demographically invariant methods, respectively. Depending on management objectives, median take ranged from 3,123 birds at a low take management goal to 6,245 at the maximum sustained yield management goal. We found that this species can sustain current reported take and likely can sustain additional take if needed. Owing to inherent differences in productivity, driven by small clutch size and lower fledging success, sandhill cranes need to be more closely monitored for take compared to more fecund species.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.