{"title":"修正寒冷和黑暗的圈养：两栖动物长寿的驱动因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/geb.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Stark G., Meiri S. Cold and dark captivity: Drivers of amphibian longevity. <i>Global Ecol Biogeogr</i>. 2018; 27: 1384–1397</b>. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12804.</p><p>After the authors changed all the mass data and the two longevity data points, they re-ran all analyses using the new dataset. The authors found similar results and patterns to the original results in their paper (see corrected tables and figures below). Indeed, if anything, patterns and results are somewhat stronger now than in their published, problematic analyses (the new analyses have steeper slopes for body size and higher model <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values).</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p><p><b>Corrected amphibian longevity results</b>.</p><p>For the original, published results without the newly corrected data, see the appendix below.</p><p>Corrected Results: the results now obtained using the new body mass values for all species and corrected longevities for the giant salamanders, <i>Andrias davidianus</i> and <i>Andrias japonicus</i>.</p><p>Below are the corrected results for the published paper: Stark, G., & Meiri, S. (2018). Cold and dark captivity: Drivers of amphibian longevity. <i>Global Ecology and Biogeography</i>, 27(11), 1384–1397. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12804.</p><p><b>Corrected TABLE 1</b> Linear regression (longevity ~ body size) using PGLS results based fixed dataset (max body size fixed and 2 species' longevities corrected using data from AnAge).\n </p><p><b>Corrected TABLE 2</b> Minimal adequate model for the analysis of all amphibian species.\n </p><p><b>Corrected TABLE 3</b> Minimal adequate model for the analysis of Anura order only.\n </p><p><b>Corrected TABLE 4</b> Minimal adequate model for the analysis of Urodela order only.\n </p><p>Appendix: Published tables and the figure that needed corrections.</p><p><b>Below is the original version, as published. The corrections for these tables and the figure appear above</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to Cold and Dark Captivity: Drivers of Amphibian Longevity\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Stark G., Meiri S. Cold and dark captivity: Drivers of amphibian longevity. <i>Global Ecol Biogeogr</i>. 2018; 27: 1384–1397</b>. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12804.</p><p>After the authors changed all the mass data and the two longevity data points, they re-ran all analyses using the new dataset. The authors found similar results and patterns to the original results in their paper (see corrected tables and figures below). Indeed, if anything, patterns and results are somewhat stronger now than in their published, problematic analyses (the new analyses have steeper slopes for body size and higher model <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values).</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p><p><b>Corrected amphibian longevity results</b>.</p><p>For the original, published results without the newly corrected data, see the appendix below.</p><p>Corrected Results: the results now obtained using the new body mass values for all species and corrected longevities for the giant salamanders, <i>Andrias davidianus</i> and <i>Andrias japonicus</i>.</p><p>Below are the corrected results for the published paper: Stark, G., & Meiri, S. (2018). Cold and dark captivity: Drivers of amphibian longevity. <i>Global Ecology and Biogeography</i>, 27(11), 1384–1397. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12804.</p><p><b>Corrected TABLE 1</b> Linear regression (longevity ~ body size) using PGLS results based fixed dataset (max body size fixed and 2 species' longevities corrected using data from AnAge).\\n </p><p><b>Corrected TABLE 2</b> Minimal adequate model for the analysis of all amphibian species.\\n </p><p><b>Corrected TABLE 3</b> Minimal adequate model for the analysis of Anura order only.\\n </p><p><b>Corrected TABLE 4</b> Minimal adequate model for the analysis of Urodela order only.\\n </p><p>Appendix: Published tables and the figure that needed corrections.</p><p><b>Below is the original version, as published. The corrections for these tables and the figure appear above</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70097\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70097\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correction to Cold and Dark Captivity: Drivers of Amphibian Longevity
Stark G., Meiri S. Cold and dark captivity: Drivers of amphibian longevity. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2018; 27: 1384–1397. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12804.
After the authors changed all the mass data and the two longevity data points, they re-ran all analyses using the new dataset. The authors found similar results and patterns to the original results in their paper (see corrected tables and figures below). Indeed, if anything, patterns and results are somewhat stronger now than in their published, problematic analyses (the new analyses have steeper slopes for body size and higher model R2 values).
We apologize for these errors.
Corrected amphibian longevity results.
For the original, published results without the newly corrected data, see the appendix below.
Corrected Results: the results now obtained using the new body mass values for all species and corrected longevities for the giant salamanders, Andrias davidianus and Andrias japonicus.
Below are the corrected results for the published paper: Stark, G., & Meiri, S. (2018). Cold and dark captivity: Drivers of amphibian longevity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27(11), 1384–1397. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12804.
Corrected TABLE 1 Linear regression (longevity ~ body size) using PGLS results based fixed dataset (max body size fixed and 2 species' longevities corrected using data from AnAge).
Corrected TABLE 2 Minimal adequate model for the analysis of all amphibian species.
Corrected TABLE 3 Minimal adequate model for the analysis of Anura order only.
Corrected TABLE 4 Minimal adequate model for the analysis of Urodela order only.
Appendix: Published tables and the figure that needed corrections.
Below is the original version, as published. The corrections for these tables and the figure appear above.
期刊介绍：
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
