衡量澳大利亚的贫困——收入的作用

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Peter Davidson, Yuvisthi Naidoo, Bruce Bradbury
{"title":"衡量澳大利亚的贫困——收入的作用","authors":"Peter Davidson,&nbsp;Yuvisthi Naidoo,&nbsp;Bruce Bradbury","doi":"10.1111/1467-8462.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite Australia's long history of independent poverty research, successive governments have failed to adopt official poverty measures. There is broad agreement among poverty researchers and advocates that at least two types of poverty measures should be adopted: income-based measures and direct or multidimensional measures of living standards. This article focusses on income-based measures. It outlines key methodological choices faced by researchers including income definitions, the treatment of housing and other assets, and optimal poverty thresholds. To assess the validity of a poverty line set at 50% of median equivalent household disposable income, we compare the profile of people in households with incomes below this level and those experiencing multiple deprivation of essentials. The article concludes with broad guidance on the development of optimal income-based poverty measures for Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46348,"journal":{"name":"Australian Economic Review","volume":"58 S1","pages":"S45-S57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8462.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Poverty in Australia—The Role of Income\",\"authors\":\"Peter Davidson,&nbsp;Yuvisthi Naidoo,&nbsp;Bruce Bradbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8462.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite Australia's long history of independent poverty research, successive governments have failed to adopt official poverty measures. There is broad agreement among poverty researchers and advocates that at least two types of poverty measures should be adopted: income-based measures and direct or multidimensional measures of living standards. This article focusses on income-based measures. It outlines key methodological choices faced by researchers including income definitions, the treatment of housing and other assets, and optimal poverty thresholds. To assess the validity of a poverty line set at 50% of median equivalent household disposable income, we compare the profile of people in households with incomes below this level and those experiencing multiple deprivation of essentials. The article concludes with broad guidance on the development of optimal income-based poverty measures for Australia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"58 S1\",\"pages\":\"S45-S57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8462.70019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8462.70019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8462.70019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管澳大利亚在独立贫困研究方面有着悠久的历史,但历届政府都未能采用官方的贫困衡量标准。贫困研究人员和倡导者普遍认为,至少应该采用两种类型的贫困措施:基于收入的措施和生活水平的直接或多维措施。本文关注的是基于收入的衡量标准。它概述了研究人员面临的关键方法选择,包括收入定义、住房和其他资产的处理以及最优贫困阈值。为了评估将贫困线设定为相当于家庭可支配收入中位数的50%的有效性,我们比较了收入低于这一水平的家庭和经历多次必需品剥夺的家庭的情况。文章最后为澳大利亚制定基于收入的最佳贫困措施提供了广泛的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measuring Poverty in Australia—The Role of Income

Measuring Poverty in Australia—The Role of Income

Despite Australia's long history of independent poverty research, successive governments have failed to adopt official poverty measures. There is broad agreement among poverty researchers and advocates that at least two types of poverty measures should be adopted: income-based measures and direct or multidimensional measures of living standards. This article focusses on income-based measures. It outlines key methodological choices faced by researchers including income definitions, the treatment of housing and other assets, and optimal poverty thresholds. To assess the validity of a poverty line set at 50% of median equivalent household disposable income, we compare the profile of people in households with incomes below this level and those experiencing multiple deprivation of essentials. The article concludes with broad guidance on the development of optimal income-based poverty measures for Australia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: An applied economics journal with a strong policy orientation, The Australian Economic Review publishes high-quality articles applying economic analysis to a wide range of macroeconomic and microeconomic topics relevant to both economic and social policy issues. Produced by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, it is the leading journal of its kind in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. While it is of special interest to Australian academics, students, policy makers, and others interested in the Australian economy, the journal also considers matters of international interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信