{"title":"乳腺癌幸存者的疲劳和共同发生的癌症相关症状:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Chih-Chieh Huang, Yu-Hsu Liu, Yi-Shiung Horng","doi":"10.1155/ecc/6615635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> The relative strength of risk factors for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among breast cancer survivors (BCSs) remains unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the strength of different risk factors for CRF using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This NMA included observational studies on female BCSs with extractable data related to risk factors for CRF. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched, and the study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (reference no. CRD42025642021). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled effect sizes, and an NMA with P-scores was used to rank the relative strength of risk factors. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were conducted to assess methodological quality and explore potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Thirty observational studies (<i>n</i> = 36,302 female BCSs) that were published between 2004 and 2024 were included in this NMA. Depression exhibited the strongest association with CRF (OR = 3.34, 95% CI 2.50–4.46, P-score = 0.9727), followed by insomnia (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.45–3.81, P-score = 0.6549), pain (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.33–2.84, P-score = 0.4587), and anxiety (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23–2.79, P-score = 0.4132). Subgroup analysis revealed that the associations of the four risk factors with CRF remained significant at the three posttreatment time points (< 1 year, 1–5 years, and > 5 years), with the exception of anxiety and insomnia at < 1 year and pain at > 5 years. Meta-regression demonstrated that higher study quality (measured via the Newcastle–Ottawa scale [NOS]) was significantly correlated with stronger associations of anxiety and insomnia with CRF (<i>β</i> = 0.305 and 0.221, <i>p</i> < 0.05, respectively). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the main findings.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Depression plays a central role in CRF development and should be prioritized in survivorship care. Integrating multimodal interventions for depression, sleep disturbances, and pain management may improve fatigue outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/6615635","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue and Co-Occurring Cancer-Related Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Chieh Huang, Yu-Hsu Liu, Yi-Shiung Horng\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ecc/6615635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Objective:</b> The relative strength of risk factors for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among breast cancer survivors (BCSs) remains unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the strength of different risk factors for CRF using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This NMA included observational studies on female BCSs with extractable data related to risk factors for CRF. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched, and the study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (reference no. CRD42025642021). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled effect sizes, and an NMA with P-scores was used to rank the relative strength of risk factors. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were conducted to assess methodological quality and explore potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Thirty observational studies (<i>n</i> = 36,302 female BCSs) that were published between 2004 and 2024 were included in this NMA. Depression exhibited the strongest association with CRF (OR = 3.34, 95% CI 2.50–4.46, P-score = 0.9727), followed by insomnia (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.45–3.81, P-score = 0.6549), pain (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.33–2.84, P-score = 0.4587), and anxiety (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23–2.79, P-score = 0.4132). Subgroup analysis revealed that the associations of the four risk factors with CRF remained significant at the three posttreatment time points (< 1 year, 1–5 years, and > 5 years), with the exception of anxiety and insomnia at < 1 year and pain at > 5 years. Meta-regression demonstrated that higher study quality (measured via the Newcastle–Ottawa scale [NOS]) was significantly correlated with stronger associations of anxiety and insomnia with CRF (<i>β</i> = 0.305 and 0.221, <i>p</i> < 0.05, respectively). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the main findings.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Depression plays a central role in CRF development and should be prioritized in survivorship care. Integrating multimodal interventions for depression, sleep disturbances, and pain management may improve fatigue outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/6615635\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/6615635\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/6615635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fatigue and Co-Occurring Cancer-Related Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Objective: The relative strength of risk factors for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among breast cancer survivors (BCSs) remains unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the strength of different risk factors for CRF using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach.
Methods: This NMA included observational studies on female BCSs with extractable data related to risk factors for CRF. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched, and the study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (reference no. CRD42025642021). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled effect sizes, and an NMA with P-scores was used to rank the relative strength of risk factors. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were conducted to assess methodological quality and explore potential sources of heterogeneity.
Results: Thirty observational studies (n = 36,302 female BCSs) that were published between 2004 and 2024 were included in this NMA. Depression exhibited the strongest association with CRF (OR = 3.34, 95% CI 2.50–4.46, P-score = 0.9727), followed by insomnia (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.45–3.81, P-score = 0.6549), pain (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.33–2.84, P-score = 0.4587), and anxiety (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23–2.79, P-score = 0.4132). Subgroup analysis revealed that the associations of the four risk factors with CRF remained significant at the three posttreatment time points (< 1 year, 1–5 years, and > 5 years), with the exception of anxiety and insomnia at < 1 year and pain at > 5 years. Meta-regression demonstrated that higher study quality (measured via the Newcastle–Ottawa scale [NOS]) was significantly correlated with stronger associations of anxiety and insomnia with CRF (β = 0.305 and 0.221, p < 0.05, respectively). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the main findings.
Conclusion: Depression plays a central role in CRF development and should be prioritized in survivorship care. Integrating multimodal interventions for depression, sleep disturbances, and pain management may improve fatigue outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of:
- Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients
- Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care
- Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients
- Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care
- Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members
- International perspectives on cancer care