乳腺癌幸存者的疲劳和共同发生的癌症相关症状:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chih-Chieh Huang, Yu-Hsu Liu, Yi-Shiung Horng
{"title":"乳腺癌幸存者的疲劳和共同发生的癌症相关症状:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Chih-Chieh Huang,&nbsp;Yu-Hsu Liu,&nbsp;Yi-Shiung Horng","doi":"10.1155/ecc/6615635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> The relative strength of risk factors for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among breast cancer survivors (BCSs) remains unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the strength of different risk factors for CRF using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This NMA included observational studies on female BCSs with extractable data related to risk factors for CRF. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched, and the study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (reference no. CRD42025642021). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled effect sizes, and an NMA with P-scores was used to rank the relative strength of risk factors. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were conducted to assess methodological quality and explore potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Thirty observational studies (<i>n</i> = 36,302 female BCSs) that were published between 2004 and 2024 were included in this NMA. Depression exhibited the strongest association with CRF (OR = 3.34, 95% CI 2.50–4.46, P-score = 0.9727), followed by insomnia (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.45–3.81, P-score = 0.6549), pain (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.33–2.84, P-score = 0.4587), and anxiety (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23–2.79, P-score = 0.4132). Subgroup analysis revealed that the associations of the four risk factors with CRF remained significant at the three posttreatment time points (&lt; 1 year, 1–5 years, and &gt; 5 years), with the exception of anxiety and insomnia at &lt; 1 year and pain at &gt; 5 years. Meta-regression demonstrated that higher study quality (measured via the Newcastle–Ottawa scale [NOS]) was significantly correlated with stronger associations of anxiety and insomnia with CRF (<i>β</i> = 0.305 and 0.221, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, respectively). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the main findings.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Depression plays a central role in CRF development and should be prioritized in survivorship care. Integrating multimodal interventions for depression, sleep disturbances, and pain management may improve fatigue outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/6615635","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue and Co-Occurring Cancer-Related Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Chieh Huang,&nbsp;Yu-Hsu Liu,&nbsp;Yi-Shiung Horng\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ecc/6615635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Objective:</b> The relative strength of risk factors for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among breast cancer survivors (BCSs) remains unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the strength of different risk factors for CRF using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This NMA included observational studies on female BCSs with extractable data related to risk factors for CRF. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched, and the study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (reference no. CRD42025642021). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled effect sizes, and an NMA with P-scores was used to rank the relative strength of risk factors. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were conducted to assess methodological quality and explore potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Thirty observational studies (<i>n</i> = 36,302 female BCSs) that were published between 2004 and 2024 were included in this NMA. Depression exhibited the strongest association with CRF (OR = 3.34, 95% CI 2.50–4.46, P-score = 0.9727), followed by insomnia (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.45–3.81, P-score = 0.6549), pain (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.33–2.84, P-score = 0.4587), and anxiety (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23–2.79, P-score = 0.4132). Subgroup analysis revealed that the associations of the four risk factors with CRF remained significant at the three posttreatment time points (&lt; 1 year, 1–5 years, and &gt; 5 years), with the exception of anxiety and insomnia at &lt; 1 year and pain at &gt; 5 years. Meta-regression demonstrated that higher study quality (measured via the Newcastle–Ottawa scale [NOS]) was significantly correlated with stronger associations of anxiety and insomnia with CRF (<i>β</i> = 0.305 and 0.221, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, respectively). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the main findings.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Depression plays a central role in CRF development and should be prioritized in survivorship care. Integrating multimodal interventions for depression, sleep disturbances, and pain management may improve fatigue outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/6615635\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/6615635\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/6615635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:乳腺癌幸存者(BCSs)癌症相关疲劳(CRF)危险因素的相对强度尚不清楚。本研究旨在运用网络元分析(NMA)方法,系统评估和比较不同风险因素对慢性心力衰竭的影响。方法:该NMA纳入了女性bcs的观察性研究,并提供了与CRF危险因素相关的可提取数据。系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库,研究方案在PROSPERO中注册(参考文献号:CRD42025642021)。随机效应荟萃分析用于估计合并效应大小,并使用带有p值的NMA对危险因素的相对强度进行排序。进行亚组分析、敏感性分析和meta回归来评估方法学质量并探索潜在的异质性来源。结果:2004年至2024年间发表的30项观察性研究(n = 36302名女性bcs)被纳入该NMA。抑郁与CRF的相关性最强(OR = 3.34, 95% CI 2.50-4.46, P-score = 0.9727),其次是失眠(OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.45-3.81, P-score = 0.6549)、疼痛(OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.33-2.84, P-score = 0.4587)和焦虑(OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23-2.79, P-score = 0.4132)。亚组分析显示,在治疗后3个时间点(1年、1 - 5年和5年),除焦虑和失眠1年和疼痛5年外,4种危险因素与CRF的相关性仍然显著。meta回归显示,较高的研究质量(通过Newcastle-Ottawa量表[NOS]测量)与焦虑和失眠与CRF的强相关性显著相关(β = 0.305和0.221,p < 0.05)。敏感性分析证实了主要发现的稳健性。结论:抑郁症在CRF的发展中起核心作用,应优先考虑生存护理。整合多模式干预抑郁症、睡眠障碍和疼痛管理可以改善疲劳的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fatigue and Co-Occurring Cancer-Related Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Fatigue and Co-Occurring Cancer-Related Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Objective: The relative strength of risk factors for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among breast cancer survivors (BCSs) remains unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the strength of different risk factors for CRF using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach.

Methods: This NMA included observational studies on female BCSs with extractable data related to risk factors for CRF. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched, and the study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (reference no. CRD42025642021). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled effect sizes, and an NMA with P-scores was used to rank the relative strength of risk factors. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were conducted to assess methodological quality and explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

Results: Thirty observational studies (n = 36,302 female BCSs) that were published between 2004 and 2024 were included in this NMA. Depression exhibited the strongest association with CRF (OR = 3.34, 95% CI 2.50–4.46, P-score = 0.9727), followed by insomnia (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.45–3.81, P-score = 0.6549), pain (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.33–2.84, P-score = 0.4587), and anxiety (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23–2.79, P-score = 0.4132). Subgroup analysis revealed that the associations of the four risk factors with CRF remained significant at the three posttreatment time points (< 1 year, 1–5 years, and > 5 years), with the exception of anxiety and insomnia at < 1 year and pain at > 5 years. Meta-regression demonstrated that higher study quality (measured via the Newcastle–Ottawa scale [NOS]) was significantly correlated with stronger associations of anxiety and insomnia with CRF (β = 0.305 and 0.221, p < 0.05, respectively). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the main findings.

Conclusion: Depression plays a central role in CRF development and should be prioritized in survivorship care. Integrating multimodal interventions for depression, sleep disturbances, and pain management may improve fatigue outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信