N. Irani, J. Duque, M. Tafili, D. Mašín, T. Wichtmann
{"title":"排水条件和单调预压对卡尔斯鲁厄细砂单调特性的影响","authors":"N. Irani, J. Duque, M. Tafili, D. Mašín, T. Wichtmann","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents the results of an experimental program aimed at evaluating the difference between undrained and drained maximum mobilized friction angles at identical initial densities and initial mean effective stress states, as well as the influence of monotonic preloadings on the monotonic behavior of Karlsruhe fine sand. For this purpose, a series of monotonic triaxial tests was performed considering different initial densities, preloading types and drainage conditions, such as drained, undrained and combinations of these within the same test. The experimental results suggest that under triaxial conditions, the drained maximum mobilized friction angle is up to <span>\\(10^{\\circ }\\)</span> larger than the corresponding undrained maximum mobilized friction angle. Furthermore, the results reveal that monotonic drained preloadings lead to significant differences in the subsequent undrained monotonic response. The capabilities of two advanced constitutive models for sands to reproduce the experimental observations were evaluated. With this aim, the models were calibrated using conventional monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests. Without any parameter adjustments, the model predictions were then inspected for samples subjected to monotonic preloading or shearing under different drainage conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 9","pages":"4369 - 4383"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of drainage conditions and monotonic preloadings on the monotonic behavior of Karlsruhe fine sand\",\"authors\":\"N. Irani, J. Duque, M. Tafili, D. Mašín, T. Wichtmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article presents the results of an experimental program aimed at evaluating the difference between undrained and drained maximum mobilized friction angles at identical initial densities and initial mean effective stress states, as well as the influence of monotonic preloadings on the monotonic behavior of Karlsruhe fine sand. For this purpose, a series of monotonic triaxial tests was performed considering different initial densities, preloading types and drainage conditions, such as drained, undrained and combinations of these within the same test. The experimental results suggest that under triaxial conditions, the drained maximum mobilized friction angle is up to <span>\\\\(10^{\\\\circ }\\\\)</span> larger than the corresponding undrained maximum mobilized friction angle. Furthermore, the results reveal that monotonic drained preloadings lead to significant differences in the subsequent undrained monotonic response. The capabilities of two advanced constitutive models for sands to reproduce the experimental observations were evaluated. With this aim, the models were calibrated using conventional monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests. Without any parameter adjustments, the model predictions were then inspected for samples subjected to monotonic preloading or shearing under different drainage conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"volume\":\"20 9\",\"pages\":\"4369 - 4383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of drainage conditions and monotonic preloadings on the monotonic behavior of Karlsruhe fine sand
This article presents the results of an experimental program aimed at evaluating the difference between undrained and drained maximum mobilized friction angles at identical initial densities and initial mean effective stress states, as well as the influence of monotonic preloadings on the monotonic behavior of Karlsruhe fine sand. For this purpose, a series of monotonic triaxial tests was performed considering different initial densities, preloading types and drainage conditions, such as drained, undrained and combinations of these within the same test. The experimental results suggest that under triaxial conditions, the drained maximum mobilized friction angle is up to \(10^{\circ }\) larger than the corresponding undrained maximum mobilized friction angle. Furthermore, the results reveal that monotonic drained preloadings lead to significant differences in the subsequent undrained monotonic response. The capabilities of two advanced constitutive models for sands to reproduce the experimental observations were evaluated. With this aim, the models were calibrated using conventional monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests. Without any parameter adjustments, the model predictions were then inspected for samples subjected to monotonic preloading or shearing under different drainage conditions.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.