注:美国大都市统计区创新系统效率评价的数据包络分析方法

IF 5.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jaime Eduardo Alarcón-Martínez;David Güemes-Castorena;Stephan M. Altmann;Martin Flegl
{"title":"注:美国大都市统计区创新系统效率评价的数据包络分析方法","authors":"Jaime Eduardo Alarcón-Martínez;David Güemes-Castorena;Stephan M. Altmann;Martin Flegl","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3592861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the innovation system of the metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the USA through the application of a two-stage data envelopment analysis model. Our two-stage model permits analyzing the process of creating solutions and transforming those solutions into an economic benefit sequentially; then, we applied the K-means algorithm, identified similarities among the MSAs under analysis, and categorized them according to their results in each model stage. This allowed us to determine the focus and opportunities for each region depending on their category. The analysis revealed that most MSAs with the best innovation efficiency are located on the West Coast, the Northeast, the Midwest, and Texas. Furthermore, by comparing the results from the proposed data envelopment analysis model to other studies’ outcomes in the context of innovation in the USA, we were able to test the robustness of the model itself. The evaluation indicates that the results are not distant from other methods’ outcomes, and the model could serve to analyze and compare regional innovation systems globally.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"3253-3261"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Note: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Efficiency Evaluation of USA Metropolitan Statistical Areas’ Innovation Systems\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Eduardo Alarcón-Martínez;David Güemes-Castorena;Stephan M. Altmann;Martin Flegl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEM.2025.3592861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to evaluate the innovation system of the metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the USA through the application of a two-stage data envelopment analysis model. Our two-stage model permits analyzing the process of creating solutions and transforming those solutions into an economic benefit sequentially; then, we applied the K-means algorithm, identified similarities among the MSAs under analysis, and categorized them according to their results in each model stage. This allowed us to determine the focus and opportunities for each region depending on their category. The analysis revealed that most MSAs with the best innovation efficiency are located on the West Coast, the Northeast, the Midwest, and Texas. Furthermore, by comparing the results from the proposed data envelopment analysis model to other studies’ outcomes in the context of innovation in the USA, we were able to test the robustness of the model itself. The evaluation indicates that the results are not distant from other methods’ outcomes, and the model could serve to analyze and compare regional innovation systems globally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"3253-3261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11098660/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11098660/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在运用两阶段数据包络分析模型,对美国都市统计区创新系统进行评价。我们的两阶段模型允许分析创造解决方案的过程,并依次将这些解决方案转化为经济效益;然后,我们运用K-means算法,识别所分析的msa之间的相似性,并根据每个模型阶段的结果对它们进行分类。这使我们能够根据每个地区的类别确定其重点和机会。分析发现,创新效率最高的msa分布在美国西海岸、东北部、中西部和德克萨斯州。此外,通过将提出的数据包络分析模型的结果与美国创新背景下的其他研究结果进行比较,我们能够检验模型本身的稳健性。评价结果表明,该模型与其他方法的结果相差不大,可用于分析和比较全球范围内的区域创新系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Note: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Efficiency Evaluation of USA Metropolitan Statistical Areas’ Innovation Systems
This study aims to evaluate the innovation system of the metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the USA through the application of a two-stage data envelopment analysis model. Our two-stage model permits analyzing the process of creating solutions and transforming those solutions into an economic benefit sequentially; then, we applied the K-means algorithm, identified similarities among the MSAs under analysis, and categorized them according to their results in each model stage. This allowed us to determine the focus and opportunities for each region depending on their category. The analysis revealed that most MSAs with the best innovation efficiency are located on the West Coast, the Northeast, the Midwest, and Texas. Furthermore, by comparing the results from the proposed data envelopment analysis model to other studies’ outcomes in the context of innovation in the USA, we were able to test the robustness of the model itself. The evaluation indicates that the results are not distant from other methods’ outcomes, and the model could serve to analyze and compare regional innovation systems globally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信