在线多模态阅读中策略使用的差异分析:与自我效能感和阅读任务表现的关系

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Siyu Zhu , Xinhua Zhu , Yuan Yao , Choo Mui Cheong
{"title":"在线多模态阅读中策略使用的差异分析:与自我效能感和阅读任务表现的关系","authors":"Siyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Xinhua Zhu ,&nbsp;Yuan Yao ,&nbsp;Choo Mui Cheong","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In today’s digital era, students must use effective strategies to comprehend multimodal texts online. International language curriculum and assessment programs (e.g., PIRLS and PISA) have advanced to evaluate students’ reading performance in this regard. However, research is lacking on how these strategies relate to reading performance, especially in assessments. Existing literature has also overlooked the role of psychological factors, such as self-efficacy. This study addresses these gaps with 280 fourth-grade students in Hong Kong answering a questionnaire and an online multimodal reading task. Latent profile analysis was used, and three distinct profiles of the strategy use were found. Further analysis revealed positive but not necessarily significant relationships between reading strategy use profiles and reading performance. Varying roles of self-efficacy beliefs was also found to influence students’reading strategy use profiles. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for fostering competent multimodal readers and the theoretical contribution to the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Data Availability</h3><div>The data used in this study will be available upon request.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiling the differences in strategy use in online multimodal reading: Associations with self-efficacy and reading task performance\",\"authors\":\"Siyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Xinhua Zhu ,&nbsp;Yuan Yao ,&nbsp;Choo Mui Cheong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In today’s digital era, students must use effective strategies to comprehend multimodal texts online. International language curriculum and assessment programs (e.g., PIRLS and PISA) have advanced to evaluate students’ reading performance in this regard. However, research is lacking on how these strategies relate to reading performance, especially in assessments. Existing literature has also overlooked the role of psychological factors, such as self-efficacy. This study addresses these gaps with 280 fourth-grade students in Hong Kong answering a questionnaire and an online multimodal reading task. Latent profile analysis was used, and three distinct profiles of the strategy use were found. Further analysis revealed positive but not necessarily significant relationships between reading strategy use profiles and reading performance. Varying roles of self-efficacy beliefs was also found to influence students’reading strategy use profiles. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for fostering competent multimodal readers and the theoretical contribution to the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Data Availability</h3><div>The data used in this study will be available upon request.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000641\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000641","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当今的数字时代,学生必须使用有效的策略来理解在线的多模态文本。国际语言课程和评估项目(如PIRLS和PISA)已经发展到评估学生在这方面的阅读表现。然而,关于这些策略与阅读表现之间的关系,特别是在评估方面,研究还很缺乏。现有文献也忽视了心理因素的作用,如自我效能感。本研究通过对香港280名四年级学生的问卷调查和在线多模式阅读任务来解决这些差距。使用潜在剖面分析,发现了三种不同的策略使用剖面。进一步的分析表明,阅读策略使用概况与阅读表现之间存在着积极但不一定显著的关系。不同角色的自我效能感信念也会影响学生的阅读策略使用概况。本研究总结了培养称职的多模态读者的教学意义以及对文献的理论贡献。数据可得性本研究中使用的数据可应要求提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profiling the differences in strategy use in online multimodal reading: Associations with self-efficacy and reading task performance
In today’s digital era, students must use effective strategies to comprehend multimodal texts online. International language curriculum and assessment programs (e.g., PIRLS and PISA) have advanced to evaluate students’ reading performance in this regard. However, research is lacking on how these strategies relate to reading performance, especially in assessments. Existing literature has also overlooked the role of psychological factors, such as self-efficacy. This study addresses these gaps with 280 fourth-grade students in Hong Kong answering a questionnaire and an online multimodal reading task. Latent profile analysis was used, and three distinct profiles of the strategy use were found. Further analysis revealed positive but not necessarily significant relationships between reading strategy use profiles and reading performance. Varying roles of self-efficacy beliefs was also found to influence students’reading strategy use profiles. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for fostering competent multimodal readers and the theoretical contribution to the literature.

Data Availability

The data used in this study will be available upon request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信