Siyu Zhu , Xinhua Zhu , Yuan Yao , Choo Mui Cheong
{"title":"在线多模态阅读中策略使用的差异分析:与自我效能感和阅读任务表现的关系","authors":"Siyu Zhu , Xinhua Zhu , Yuan Yao , Choo Mui Cheong","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In today’s digital era, students must use effective strategies to comprehend multimodal texts online. International language curriculum and assessment programs (e.g., PIRLS and PISA) have advanced to evaluate students’ reading performance in this regard. However, research is lacking on how these strategies relate to reading performance, especially in assessments. Existing literature has also overlooked the role of psychological factors, such as self-efficacy. This study addresses these gaps with 280 fourth-grade students in Hong Kong answering a questionnaire and an online multimodal reading task. Latent profile analysis was used, and three distinct profiles of the strategy use were found. Further analysis revealed positive but not necessarily significant relationships between reading strategy use profiles and reading performance. Varying roles of self-efficacy beliefs was also found to influence students’reading strategy use profiles. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for fostering competent multimodal readers and the theoretical contribution to the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Data Availability</h3><div>The data used in this study will be available upon request.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiling the differences in strategy use in online multimodal reading: Associations with self-efficacy and reading task performance\",\"authors\":\"Siyu Zhu , Xinhua Zhu , Yuan Yao , Choo Mui Cheong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In today’s digital era, students must use effective strategies to comprehend multimodal texts online. International language curriculum and assessment programs (e.g., PIRLS and PISA) have advanced to evaluate students’ reading performance in this regard. However, research is lacking on how these strategies relate to reading performance, especially in assessments. Existing literature has also overlooked the role of psychological factors, such as self-efficacy. This study addresses these gaps with 280 fourth-grade students in Hong Kong answering a questionnaire and an online multimodal reading task. Latent profile analysis was used, and three distinct profiles of the strategy use were found. Further analysis revealed positive but not necessarily significant relationships between reading strategy use profiles and reading performance. Varying roles of self-efficacy beliefs was also found to influence students’reading strategy use profiles. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for fostering competent multimodal readers and the theoretical contribution to the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Data Availability</h3><div>The data used in this study will be available upon request.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000641\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000641","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Profiling the differences in strategy use in online multimodal reading: Associations with self-efficacy and reading task performance
In today’s digital era, students must use effective strategies to comprehend multimodal texts online. International language curriculum and assessment programs (e.g., PIRLS and PISA) have advanced to evaluate students’ reading performance in this regard. However, research is lacking on how these strategies relate to reading performance, especially in assessments. Existing literature has also overlooked the role of psychological factors, such as self-efficacy. This study addresses these gaps with 280 fourth-grade students in Hong Kong answering a questionnaire and an online multimodal reading task. Latent profile analysis was used, and three distinct profiles of the strategy use were found. Further analysis revealed positive but not necessarily significant relationships between reading strategy use profiles and reading performance. Varying roles of self-efficacy beliefs was also found to influence students’reading strategy use profiles. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for fostering competent multimodal readers and the theoretical contribution to the literature.
Data Availability
The data used in this study will be available upon request.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.