重新定义杠杆点框架中社会经济物质储备的作用,以实现转型变革

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Willi Haas , David James Abson , Helmut Haberl , Nathalie Spittler , Dominik Wiedenhofer , Christian Dorninger
{"title":"重新定义杠杆点框架中社会经济物质储备的作用,以实现转型变革","authors":"Willi Haas ,&nbsp;David James Abson ,&nbsp;Helmut Haberl ,&nbsp;Nathalie Spittler ,&nbsp;Dominik Wiedenhofer ,&nbsp;Christian Dorninger","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing the intensifying climate crisis and the transgression of multiple Planetary Boundaries requires a deep socio-ecological transformation. From the perspective of complex systems, the following question arises: Which leverage points need to be addressed to push socio-economic systems in a more sustainable direction? While we agree that the leverage points heuristic proposed by Donella Meadows is useful, we herein argue that it would benefit from emphasizing the pivotal role of socioeconomic material stocks as enablers and inhibitors of transformative change. Currently, socioeconomic stocks are pigeonholed as a shallow leverage point. However, from a socio-metabolic perspective, existing stocks are key drivers of environmental pressures, which foster unsustainable individual behaviours and thus create path dependencies and lock-ins. Stocks can even shape the societal perception of challenges that often foster unsustainable responses. Hence, system-wide socio-ecological change hinges on fundamental changes in socioeconomic stocks. Transformative change requires a reconceptualization of stocks embracing their multidimensional and cross-cutting interconnectedness with the deeper leverage points around system feedback, design, and intent. Rather than looking for the one deep leverage point, we suggest that a well-coordinated intervention strategy needs to target multiple leverage points while systematically considering socioeconomic stocks as an inherent, critical system property to be altered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 108759"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing the role of socioeconomic material stocks in the leverage points framework to enable transformative change\",\"authors\":\"Willi Haas ,&nbsp;David James Abson ,&nbsp;Helmut Haberl ,&nbsp;Nathalie Spittler ,&nbsp;Dominik Wiedenhofer ,&nbsp;Christian Dorninger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Addressing the intensifying climate crisis and the transgression of multiple Planetary Boundaries requires a deep socio-ecological transformation. From the perspective of complex systems, the following question arises: Which leverage points need to be addressed to push socio-economic systems in a more sustainable direction? While we agree that the leverage points heuristic proposed by Donella Meadows is useful, we herein argue that it would benefit from emphasizing the pivotal role of socioeconomic material stocks as enablers and inhibitors of transformative change. Currently, socioeconomic stocks are pigeonholed as a shallow leverage point. However, from a socio-metabolic perspective, existing stocks are key drivers of environmental pressures, which foster unsustainable individual behaviours and thus create path dependencies and lock-ins. Stocks can even shape the societal perception of challenges that often foster unsustainable responses. Hence, system-wide socio-ecological change hinges on fundamental changes in socioeconomic stocks. Transformative change requires a reconceptualization of stocks embracing their multidimensional and cross-cutting interconnectedness with the deeper leverage points around system feedback, design, and intent. Rather than looking for the one deep leverage point, we suggest that a well-coordinated intervention strategy needs to target multiple leverage points while systematically considering socioeconomic stocks as an inherent, critical system property to be altered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"239 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108759\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925002423\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925002423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解决日益加剧的气候危机和对多重地球边界的侵犯需要深刻的社会生态转型。从复杂系统的角度来看,出现了以下问题:需要解决哪些杠杆点来推动社会经济系统朝着更可持续的方向发展?虽然我们同意Donella Meadows提出的杠杆点启发式是有用的,但我们在此认为,强调社会经济物质储备作为变革变革的推动者和抑制剂的关键作用将会受益。目前,社会经济股票被归类为一个较浅的杠杆点。然而,从社会代谢的角度来看,现有种群是环境压力的主要驱动因素,环境压力助长了不可持续的个人行为,从而造成路径依赖和锁定。库存甚至可以塑造社会对挑战的看法,而这些挑战往往会助长不可持续的应对措施。因此,全系统的社会生态变化取决于社会经济存量的根本变化。变革需要对股票进行重新概念化,将其多维度和跨领域的相互联系与围绕系统反馈、设计和意图的更深层次的杠杆点结合起来。与其寻找一个深层杠杆点,我们建议一个协调良好的干预策略需要针对多个杠杆点,同时系统地考虑社会经济存量作为一个固有的、关键的系统属性被改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconceptualizing the role of socioeconomic material stocks in the leverage points framework to enable transformative change
Addressing the intensifying climate crisis and the transgression of multiple Planetary Boundaries requires a deep socio-ecological transformation. From the perspective of complex systems, the following question arises: Which leverage points need to be addressed to push socio-economic systems in a more sustainable direction? While we agree that the leverage points heuristic proposed by Donella Meadows is useful, we herein argue that it would benefit from emphasizing the pivotal role of socioeconomic material stocks as enablers and inhibitors of transformative change. Currently, socioeconomic stocks are pigeonholed as a shallow leverage point. However, from a socio-metabolic perspective, existing stocks are key drivers of environmental pressures, which foster unsustainable individual behaviours and thus create path dependencies and lock-ins. Stocks can even shape the societal perception of challenges that often foster unsustainable responses. Hence, system-wide socio-ecological change hinges on fundamental changes in socioeconomic stocks. Transformative change requires a reconceptualization of stocks embracing their multidimensional and cross-cutting interconnectedness with the deeper leverage points around system feedback, design, and intent. Rather than looking for the one deep leverage point, we suggest that a well-coordinated intervention strategy needs to target multiple leverage points while systematically considering socioeconomic stocks as an inherent, critical system property to be altered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信