政策如何影响生活垃圾源头分类：中国的探索性研究

IF 4.4 3区经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS

Utilities Policy Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jup.2025.102030

Zhaoyun Yin , Jing Ma , Canyou Wang , Jiajia Cao , Haimei Li

{"title":"政策如何影响生活垃圾源头分类：中国的探索性研究","authors":"Zhaoyun Yin , Jing Ma , Canyou Wang , Jiajia Cao , Haimei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the impact of policies on household separation behavior. A theoretical framework integrating the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior was proposed to elucidate this relationship. The primary finding revealed that policy perception is the core explanatory variable linking policy to the behavioral changes. Furthermore, the mechanisms of policy perception were identified, showing that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness represent two types of policy perceptions, each of which impacts behavior differently. Due to its exploratory nature, the findings warrant validation through further statistical analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102030"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How policies impact household waste-source separation: an exploratory study of China\",\"authors\":\"Zhaoyun Yin , Jing Ma , Canyou Wang , Jiajia Cao , Haimei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the impact of policies on household separation behavior. A theoretical framework integrating the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior was proposed to elucidate this relationship. The primary finding revealed that policy perception is the core explanatory variable linking policy to the behavioral changes. Furthermore, the mechanisms of policy perception were identified, showing that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness represent two types of policy perceptions, each of which impacts behavior differently. Due to its exploratory nature, the findings warrant validation through further statistical analyses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001456\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨政策对家庭分离行为的影响。结合技术接受模型和计划行为理论，提出了一个理论框架来解释这种关系。研究发现，政策认知是政策与行为变化之间的核心解释变量。此外，我们还发现政策感知的机制，表明感知易用性和感知有用性代表两种类型的政策感知，每种类型的政策感知对行为的影响不同。由于其探索性，研究结果需要通过进一步的统计分析来验证。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How policies impact household waste-source separation: an exploratory study of China

This study explores the impact of policies on household separation behavior. A theoretical framework integrating the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior was proposed to elucidate this relationship. The primary finding revealed that policy perception is the core explanatory variable linking policy to the behavioral changes. Furthermore, the mechanisms of policy perception were identified, showing that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness represent two types of policy perceptions, each of which impacts behavior differently. Due to its exploratory nature, the findings warrant validation through further statistical analyses.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

CiteScore

6.80

自引率

10.00%

发文量

审稿时长

66 days

期刊介绍： Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.