利用双平面透视评估不同鞋型在行走过程中的后脚运动学

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Hee Soo Han , Hee Jin Yang , Naomichi Ogihara , Taeyong Lee , Seungbum Koo , Dong Yeon Lee , Kyoung Min Lee
{"title":"利用双平面透视评估不同鞋型在行走过程中的后脚运动学","authors":"Hee Soo Han ,&nbsp;Hee Jin Yang ,&nbsp;Naomichi Ogihara ,&nbsp;Taeyong Lee ,&nbsp;Seungbum Koo ,&nbsp;Dong Yeon Lee ,&nbsp;Kyoung Min Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unlike Skin marker-based models, biplanar fluoroscopy can evaluate the kinematic effects of various shoes. This study investigated foot and ankle kinematics across various shoe types during walking using a biplanar fluoroscopic system. Fifteen healthy participants were enrolled. All participants underwent three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography, and biplanar fluoroscopic images were captured during the stance phase of gait for barefoot and three different shoe types. 3D kinematic data of the ankle and subtalar joints were calculated using the anatomical coordinate system through the 3D/2D registration method. Running shoes (RS) significantly reduced maximum ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.007), hindfoot dorsiflexion (p = 0.001) compared with barefoot. Rocker bottom shoes (RBS) reduced ankle and hindfoot DF-PF ROM (p &lt; 0.001), and increased subtalar ROM by increasing subtalar plantarflexion(p = 0.047). Climbing shoes reduced the peak hindfoot dorsiflexion (p &lt; 0.001), and ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.013). High heels (HH) caused significant ankle (p &lt; 0.001) and hindfoot (p &lt; 0.001) plantar flexion, along with increased hindfoot inversion (p = 0.008) and internal rotation (p = 0.003). In conclusion, Shoed walking reduced dorsiflexion compared with barefoot walking, potentially benefiting conditions such as anterior ankle impingement. RBSs may alleviate arthritis symptoms by limiting motion, whereas HHs increase hindfoot inversion, potentially increasing the risk of ankle injury and long-term joint damage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 112914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of different hindfoot kinematics according to various shoe types during walking using biplanar fluoroscopy\",\"authors\":\"Hee Soo Han ,&nbsp;Hee Jin Yang ,&nbsp;Naomichi Ogihara ,&nbsp;Taeyong Lee ,&nbsp;Seungbum Koo ,&nbsp;Dong Yeon Lee ,&nbsp;Kyoung Min Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Unlike Skin marker-based models, biplanar fluoroscopy can evaluate the kinematic effects of various shoes. This study investigated foot and ankle kinematics across various shoe types during walking using a biplanar fluoroscopic system. Fifteen healthy participants were enrolled. All participants underwent three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography, and biplanar fluoroscopic images were captured during the stance phase of gait for barefoot and three different shoe types. 3D kinematic data of the ankle and subtalar joints were calculated using the anatomical coordinate system through the 3D/2D registration method. Running shoes (RS) significantly reduced maximum ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.007), hindfoot dorsiflexion (p = 0.001) compared with barefoot. Rocker bottom shoes (RBS) reduced ankle and hindfoot DF-PF ROM (p &lt; 0.001), and increased subtalar ROM by increasing subtalar plantarflexion(p = 0.047). Climbing shoes reduced the peak hindfoot dorsiflexion (p &lt; 0.001), and ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.013). High heels (HH) caused significant ankle (p &lt; 0.001) and hindfoot (p &lt; 0.001) plantar flexion, along with increased hindfoot inversion (p = 0.008) and internal rotation (p = 0.003). In conclusion, Shoed walking reduced dorsiflexion compared with barefoot walking, potentially benefiting conditions such as anterior ankle impingement. RBSs may alleviate arthritis symptoms by limiting motion, whereas HHs increase hindfoot inversion, potentially increasing the risk of ankle injury and long-term joint damage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004269\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与基于皮肤标记的模型不同,双平面透视可以评估各种鞋子的运动学影响。本研究使用双平面透视系统研究了不同鞋型在行走过程中的足部和踝关节运动学。15名健康参与者被招募。所有参与者都进行了三维(3D)计算机断层扫描,并在赤脚和三种不同鞋型的步态站立阶段捕获了双平面透视图像。通过三维/二维配准方法,采用解剖坐标系计算踝关节和距下关节的三维运动数据。与赤脚相比,跑鞋(RS)显著降低了最大踝关节背屈度(p = 0.007)和后脚背屈度(p = 0.001)。摇椅底鞋(RBS)减少了踝关节和后足DF-PF ROM (p < 0.001),并通过增加距下跖屈来增加距下ROM (p = 0.047)。登山鞋降低了后足背屈峰值(p < 0.001)和踝关节背屈峰值(p = 0.013)。高跟鞋(HH)导致明显的踝关节(p < 0.001)和后足(p < 0.001)足底屈曲,同时增加后足内翻(p = 0.008)和内旋(p = 0.003)。总之,与光脚走路相比,穿鞋走路可以减少背屈,这对踝关节前撞击等疾病有潜在的好处。RBSs可能通过限制运动来缓解关节炎症状,而HHs会增加后足内翻,潜在地增加踝关节损伤和长期关节损伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of different hindfoot kinematics according to various shoe types during walking using biplanar fluoroscopy
Unlike Skin marker-based models, biplanar fluoroscopy can evaluate the kinematic effects of various shoes. This study investigated foot and ankle kinematics across various shoe types during walking using a biplanar fluoroscopic system. Fifteen healthy participants were enrolled. All participants underwent three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography, and biplanar fluoroscopic images were captured during the stance phase of gait for barefoot and three different shoe types. 3D kinematic data of the ankle and subtalar joints were calculated using the anatomical coordinate system through the 3D/2D registration method. Running shoes (RS) significantly reduced maximum ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.007), hindfoot dorsiflexion (p = 0.001) compared with barefoot. Rocker bottom shoes (RBS) reduced ankle and hindfoot DF-PF ROM (p < 0.001), and increased subtalar ROM by increasing subtalar plantarflexion(p = 0.047). Climbing shoes reduced the peak hindfoot dorsiflexion (p < 0.001), and ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.013). High heels (HH) caused significant ankle (p < 0.001) and hindfoot (p < 0.001) plantar flexion, along with increased hindfoot inversion (p = 0.008) and internal rotation (p = 0.003). In conclusion, Shoed walking reduced dorsiflexion compared with barefoot walking, potentially benefiting conditions such as anterior ankle impingement. RBSs may alleviate arthritis symptoms by limiting motion, whereas HHs increase hindfoot inversion, potentially increasing the risk of ankle injury and long-term joint damage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信