Hee Soo Han , Hee Jin Yang , Naomichi Ogihara , Taeyong Lee , Seungbum Koo , Dong Yeon Lee , Kyoung Min Lee
{"title":"利用双平面透视评估不同鞋型在行走过程中的后脚运动学","authors":"Hee Soo Han , Hee Jin Yang , Naomichi Ogihara , Taeyong Lee , Seungbum Koo , Dong Yeon Lee , Kyoung Min Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unlike Skin marker-based models, biplanar fluoroscopy can evaluate the kinematic effects of various shoes. This study investigated foot and ankle kinematics across various shoe types during walking using a biplanar fluoroscopic system. Fifteen healthy participants were enrolled. All participants underwent three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography, and biplanar fluoroscopic images were captured during the stance phase of gait for barefoot and three different shoe types. 3D kinematic data of the ankle and subtalar joints were calculated using the anatomical coordinate system through the 3D/2D registration method. Running shoes (RS) significantly reduced maximum ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.007), hindfoot dorsiflexion (p = 0.001) compared with barefoot. Rocker bottom shoes (RBS) reduced ankle and hindfoot DF-PF ROM (p < 0.001), and increased subtalar ROM by increasing subtalar plantarflexion(p = 0.047). Climbing shoes reduced the peak hindfoot dorsiflexion (p < 0.001), and ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.013). High heels (HH) caused significant ankle (p < 0.001) and hindfoot (p < 0.001) plantar flexion, along with increased hindfoot inversion (p = 0.008) and internal rotation (p = 0.003). In conclusion, Shoed walking reduced dorsiflexion compared with barefoot walking, potentially benefiting conditions such as anterior ankle impingement. RBSs may alleviate arthritis symptoms by limiting motion, whereas HHs increase hindfoot inversion, potentially increasing the risk of ankle injury and long-term joint damage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 112914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of different hindfoot kinematics according to various shoe types during walking using biplanar fluoroscopy\",\"authors\":\"Hee Soo Han , Hee Jin Yang , Naomichi Ogihara , Taeyong Lee , Seungbum Koo , Dong Yeon Lee , Kyoung Min Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Unlike Skin marker-based models, biplanar fluoroscopy can evaluate the kinematic effects of various shoes. This study investigated foot and ankle kinematics across various shoe types during walking using a biplanar fluoroscopic system. Fifteen healthy participants were enrolled. All participants underwent three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography, and biplanar fluoroscopic images were captured during the stance phase of gait for barefoot and three different shoe types. 3D kinematic data of the ankle and subtalar joints were calculated using the anatomical coordinate system through the 3D/2D registration method. Running shoes (RS) significantly reduced maximum ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.007), hindfoot dorsiflexion (p = 0.001) compared with barefoot. Rocker bottom shoes (RBS) reduced ankle and hindfoot DF-PF ROM (p < 0.001), and increased subtalar ROM by increasing subtalar plantarflexion(p = 0.047). Climbing shoes reduced the peak hindfoot dorsiflexion (p < 0.001), and ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.013). High heels (HH) caused significant ankle (p < 0.001) and hindfoot (p < 0.001) plantar flexion, along with increased hindfoot inversion (p = 0.008) and internal rotation (p = 0.003). In conclusion, Shoed walking reduced dorsiflexion compared with barefoot walking, potentially benefiting conditions such as anterior ankle impingement. RBSs may alleviate arthritis symptoms by limiting motion, whereas HHs increase hindfoot inversion, potentially increasing the risk of ankle injury and long-term joint damage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004269\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of different hindfoot kinematics according to various shoe types during walking using biplanar fluoroscopy
Unlike Skin marker-based models, biplanar fluoroscopy can evaluate the kinematic effects of various shoes. This study investigated foot and ankle kinematics across various shoe types during walking using a biplanar fluoroscopic system. Fifteen healthy participants were enrolled. All participants underwent three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography, and biplanar fluoroscopic images were captured during the stance phase of gait for barefoot and three different shoe types. 3D kinematic data of the ankle and subtalar joints were calculated using the anatomical coordinate system through the 3D/2D registration method. Running shoes (RS) significantly reduced maximum ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.007), hindfoot dorsiflexion (p = 0.001) compared with barefoot. Rocker bottom shoes (RBS) reduced ankle and hindfoot DF-PF ROM (p < 0.001), and increased subtalar ROM by increasing subtalar plantarflexion(p = 0.047). Climbing shoes reduced the peak hindfoot dorsiflexion (p < 0.001), and ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.013). High heels (HH) caused significant ankle (p < 0.001) and hindfoot (p < 0.001) plantar flexion, along with increased hindfoot inversion (p = 0.008) and internal rotation (p = 0.003). In conclusion, Shoed walking reduced dorsiflexion compared with barefoot walking, potentially benefiting conditions such as anterior ankle impingement. RBSs may alleviate arthritis symptoms by limiting motion, whereas HHs increase hindfoot inversion, potentially increasing the risk of ankle injury and long-term joint damage.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.