{"title":"全球南方走向公正转型的途径","authors":"Johanna Gather , Martin Prowse , Daniel Seussler","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global decarbonization efforts accelerate, ensuring a just transition has become a critical objective, especially in low- and middle-income countries where climate action intersects with entrenched development challenges. This study uses a realist review and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 80 interventions across 76 studies to identify the configurations of financial, institutional, and governance conditions that contribute towards just transitions in developing countries. We find seven distinct causal pathways, with robust funding and strategic planning emerging as universally necessary conditions. Surprisingly, factors often considered essential—such as stakeholder engagement and policy alignment—are not consistently present. Complementary fractional logistic regression reinforces the centrality of funding and planning, while underscoring the limited predictive power of single variables. Our findings highlight the configurational and context-dependent nature of just transition outcomes. By illuminating diverse pathways to inclusive decarbonization, this article contributes to bridging the empirical gap in understanding transition policy in developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104293"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathways towards just transitions in the Global South\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Gather , Martin Prowse , Daniel Seussler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As global decarbonization efforts accelerate, ensuring a just transition has become a critical objective, especially in low- and middle-income countries where climate action intersects with entrenched development challenges. This study uses a realist review and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 80 interventions across 76 studies to identify the configurations of financial, institutional, and governance conditions that contribute towards just transitions in developing countries. We find seven distinct causal pathways, with robust funding and strategic planning emerging as universally necessary conditions. Surprisingly, factors often considered essential—such as stakeholder engagement and policy alignment—are not consistently present. Complementary fractional logistic regression reinforces the centrality of funding and planning, while underscoring the limited predictive power of single variables. Our findings highlight the configurational and context-dependent nature of just transition outcomes. By illuminating diverse pathways to inclusive decarbonization, this article contributes to bridging the empirical gap in understanding transition policy in developing countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003743\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pathways towards just transitions in the Global South
As global decarbonization efforts accelerate, ensuring a just transition has become a critical objective, especially in low- and middle-income countries where climate action intersects with entrenched development challenges. This study uses a realist review and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 80 interventions across 76 studies to identify the configurations of financial, institutional, and governance conditions that contribute towards just transitions in developing countries. We find seven distinct causal pathways, with robust funding and strategic planning emerging as universally necessary conditions. Surprisingly, factors often considered essential—such as stakeholder engagement and policy alignment—are not consistently present. Complementary fractional logistic regression reinforces the centrality of funding and planning, while underscoring the limited predictive power of single variables. Our findings highlight the configurational and context-dependent nature of just transition outcomes. By illuminating diverse pathways to inclusive decarbonization, this article contributes to bridging the empirical gap in understanding transition policy in developing countries.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.