全球南方走向公正转型的途径

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Johanna Gather , Martin Prowse , Daniel Seussler
{"title":"全球南方走向公正转型的途径","authors":"Johanna Gather ,&nbsp;Martin Prowse ,&nbsp;Daniel Seussler","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global decarbonization efforts accelerate, ensuring a just transition has become a critical objective, especially in low- and middle-income countries where climate action intersects with entrenched development challenges. This study uses a realist review and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 80 interventions across 76 studies to identify the configurations of financial, institutional, and governance conditions that contribute towards just transitions in developing countries. We find seven distinct causal pathways, with robust funding and strategic planning emerging as universally necessary conditions. Surprisingly, factors often considered essential—such as stakeholder engagement and policy alignment—are not consistently present. Complementary fractional logistic regression reinforces the centrality of funding and planning, while underscoring the limited predictive power of single variables. Our findings highlight the configurational and context-dependent nature of just transition outcomes. By illuminating diverse pathways to inclusive decarbonization, this article contributes to bridging the empirical gap in understanding transition policy in developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104293"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathways towards just transitions in the Global South\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Gather ,&nbsp;Martin Prowse ,&nbsp;Daniel Seussler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As global decarbonization efforts accelerate, ensuring a just transition has become a critical objective, especially in low- and middle-income countries where climate action intersects with entrenched development challenges. This study uses a realist review and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 80 interventions across 76 studies to identify the configurations of financial, institutional, and governance conditions that contribute towards just transitions in developing countries. We find seven distinct causal pathways, with robust funding and strategic planning emerging as universally necessary conditions. Surprisingly, factors often considered essential—such as stakeholder engagement and policy alignment—are not consistently present. Complementary fractional logistic regression reinforces the centrality of funding and planning, while underscoring the limited predictive power of single variables. Our findings highlight the configurational and context-dependent nature of just transition outcomes. By illuminating diverse pathways to inclusive decarbonization, this article contributes to bridging the empirical gap in understanding transition policy in developing countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003743\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球脱碳努力的加快,确保公正转型已成为一项关键目标,特别是在气候行动与根深蒂固的发展挑战交织在一起的低收入和中等收入国家。本研究对76项研究中的80项干预措施进行了现实主义回顾和模糊集定性比较分析,以确定有助于发展中国家公正转型的金融、制度和治理条件的配置。我们发现了七种不同的因果关系,强有力的资金和战略规划成为普遍必要的条件。令人惊讶的是,通常被认为是必不可少的因素——比如利益相关者的参与和政策的一致性——并不总是存在。互补的分数逻辑回归强化了资金和计划的中心地位,同时强调了单一变量的有限预测能力。我们的研究结果强调了过渡结果的配置和上下文依赖性质。通过阐明包容性脱碳的多种途径,本文有助于弥合理解发展中国家转型政策的经验差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathways towards just transitions in the Global South
As global decarbonization efforts accelerate, ensuring a just transition has become a critical objective, especially in low- and middle-income countries where climate action intersects with entrenched development challenges. This study uses a realist review and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 80 interventions across 76 studies to identify the configurations of financial, institutional, and governance conditions that contribute towards just transitions in developing countries. We find seven distinct causal pathways, with robust funding and strategic planning emerging as universally necessary conditions. Surprisingly, factors often considered essential—such as stakeholder engagement and policy alignment—are not consistently present. Complementary fractional logistic regression reinforces the centrality of funding and planning, while underscoring the limited predictive power of single variables. Our findings highlight the configurational and context-dependent nature of just transition outcomes. By illuminating diverse pathways to inclusive decarbonization, this article contributes to bridging the empirical gap in understanding transition policy in developing countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信