利用矿物学和机器学习方法估算华南砂岩的UCS

IF 4.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jin Lu , Xiaofan Liao , Ahmad Rastegarnia , Jafar Qajar
{"title":"利用矿物学和机器学习方法估算华南砂岩的UCS","authors":"Jin Lu ,&nbsp;Xiaofan Liao ,&nbsp;Ahmad Rastegarnia ,&nbsp;Jafar Qajar","doi":"10.1016/j.pce.2025.104048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Slope stability analysis, rock mass classification, and foundation modeling necessitate measuring rocks' uniaxial compressive strength (UCS). Direct measurement is costly and time-consuming, prompting researchers to seek indirect methods. This research aimed to predict the UCS of sandstone samples using the quartz ratio and index properties. Models—including Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network (FANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR)—were tested with varying input quantities and evaluated using Taylor's diagram, error level, A20 index, agreement index, and Calculated Performance Index (CPI). Petrography classified the sandstones as arenite, litharenite, and feldspathic litharenite; based on the results, the latter showed higher UCS, and fracture modes shifted from axial to multiple types as strength increased. Modeling revealed that KNN and FANN performance varied with distance metrics and training algorithms. Increasing inputs improved KNN and MLR accuracy but reduced SVR, ANFIS, and FANN accuracy. Additionally, the MLR's sensitivity to changes in inputs was greater than that of other methods. Comparing modeling results showed that the SVR based on the radial basis function with, CPI of 1.98, mean absolute percentage error of 0.75, A20 index of 1.00, and agreement index of 1.00, displayed the highest performance in UCS prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54616,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 104048"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating UCS of South China sandstones using mineralogical and machine learning approaches\",\"authors\":\"Jin Lu ,&nbsp;Xiaofan Liao ,&nbsp;Ahmad Rastegarnia ,&nbsp;Jafar Qajar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pce.2025.104048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Slope stability analysis, rock mass classification, and foundation modeling necessitate measuring rocks' uniaxial compressive strength (UCS). Direct measurement is costly and time-consuming, prompting researchers to seek indirect methods. This research aimed to predict the UCS of sandstone samples using the quartz ratio and index properties. Models—including Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network (FANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR)—were tested with varying input quantities and evaluated using Taylor's diagram, error level, A20 index, agreement index, and Calculated Performance Index (CPI). Petrography classified the sandstones as arenite, litharenite, and feldspathic litharenite; based on the results, the latter showed higher UCS, and fracture modes shifted from axial to multiple types as strength increased. Modeling revealed that KNN and FANN performance varied with distance metrics and training algorithms. Increasing inputs improved KNN and MLR accuracy but reduced SVR, ANFIS, and FANN accuracy. Additionally, the MLR's sensitivity to changes in inputs was greater than that of other methods. Comparing modeling results showed that the SVR based on the radial basis function with, CPI of 1.98, mean absolute percentage error of 0.75, A20 index of 1.00, and agreement index of 1.00, displayed the highest performance in UCS prediction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474706525001986\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474706525001986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

边坡稳定性分析、岩体分类和地基建模都需要测量岩石的单轴抗压强度(UCS)。直接测量既昂贵又耗时,促使研究人员寻求间接方法。本研究的目的是利用石英比和指数性质预测砂岩样品的UCS。模型——包括前馈人工神经网络(FANN)、自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)、支持向量回归(SVR)、k近邻(KNN)和多元线性回归(MLR)——在不同的输入量下进行测试,并使用泰勒图、误差水平、A20指数、协议指数和计算性能指数(CPI)进行评估。岩石学将砂岩分为砂屑岩、岩屑岩和长石岩屑岩;结果表明,随着强度的增加,后者具有较高的UCS,且断裂模式由轴向向多类型转变。建模表明,KNN和FANN的性能随距离度量和训练算法的不同而变化。增加输入提高了KNN和MLR的精度,但降低了SVR、ANFIS和FANN的精度。此外,MLR对输入变化的敏感性高于其他方法。对比建模结果表明,基于径向基函数的SVR在UCS预测中表现最好,CPI为1.98,平均绝对百分比误差为0.75,A20指数为1.00,一致性指数为1.00。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating UCS of South China sandstones using mineralogical and machine learning approaches
Slope stability analysis, rock mass classification, and foundation modeling necessitate measuring rocks' uniaxial compressive strength (UCS). Direct measurement is costly and time-consuming, prompting researchers to seek indirect methods. This research aimed to predict the UCS of sandstone samples using the quartz ratio and index properties. Models—including Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network (FANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR)—were tested with varying input quantities and evaluated using Taylor's diagram, error level, A20 index, agreement index, and Calculated Performance Index (CPI). Petrography classified the sandstones as arenite, litharenite, and feldspathic litharenite; based on the results, the latter showed higher UCS, and fracture modes shifted from axial to multiple types as strength increased. Modeling revealed that KNN and FANN performance varied with distance metrics and training algorithms. Increasing inputs improved KNN and MLR accuracy but reduced SVR, ANFIS, and FANN accuracy. Additionally, the MLR's sensitivity to changes in inputs was greater than that of other methods. Comparing modeling results showed that the SVR based on the radial basis function with, CPI of 1.98, mean absolute percentage error of 0.75, A20 index of 1.00, and agreement index of 1.00, displayed the highest performance in UCS prediction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
176
审稿时长
31.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Physics and Chemistry of the Earth is an international interdisciplinary journal for the rapid publication of collections of refereed communications in separate thematic issues, either stemming from scientific meetings, or, especially compiled for the occasion. There is no restriction on the length of articles published in the journal. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth incorporates the separate Parts A, B and C which existed until the end of 2001. Please note: the Editors are unable to consider submissions that are not invited or linked to a thematic issue. Please do not submit unsolicited papers. The journal covers the following subject areas: -Solid Earth and Geodesy: (geology, geochemistry, tectonophysics, seismology, volcanology, palaeomagnetism and rock magnetism, electromagnetism and potential fields, marine and environmental geosciences as well as geodesy). -Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere: (hydrology and water resources research, engineering and management, oceanography and oceanic chemistry, shelf, sea, lake and river sciences, meteorology and atmospheric sciences incl. chemistry as well as climatology and glaciology). -Solar-Terrestrial and Planetary Science: (solar, heliospheric and solar-planetary sciences, geology, geophysics and atmospheric sciences of planets, satellites and small bodies as well as cosmochemistry and exobiology).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信