应激诱导和应激后休息时边缘功能连通性对皮质醇应激反应和恢复的调节不同

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Xiao Luo , Xiaolin Zhao , Shuai Wang , Kun Shi , Jiahao Huang , Juan Yang
{"title":"应激诱导和应激后休息时边缘功能连通性对皮质醇应激反应和恢复的调节不同","authors":"Xiao Luo ,&nbsp;Xiaolin Zhao ,&nbsp;Shuai Wang ,&nbsp;Kun Shi ,&nbsp;Jiahao Huang ,&nbsp;Juan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and its end-product cortisol play an important role in adaptation to stressful situations. Previous studies have suggested brain regions in the limbic area (e.g., basolateral amygdala-BLA, centromedial amygdala-CMA, hippocampus) regulate cortisol stress response (i.e., initial cortisol stress reactivity and a late recovery). However, whether these limbic areas regulate cortisol stress reactivity and recovery differently remains elusive. Using the Seed-to-Voxel gPPI analysis, we explored the functional connectivity (FC) between the limbic area and other brain regions during stress induction and their association with cortisol stress reactivity. Similarly, we explored their FC during post-stress rest and their association with cortisol stress recovery. We found that both BLA and CMA connectivity related to cortisol stress reactivity during stress induction, with similarity in FC with precuneus and differences in FC with angular gyrus, precentral gyrus, and PFC; the BLA rather than CMA connectivity with PFC linked to cortisol stress recovery during post-stress rest. Furthermore, the hippocampal-PFC connectivity only affected cortisol stress recovery during post-stress rest, and in a different direction from the effect of BLA-PFC connectivity. Our findings provide important insight into the neurobiological etiology underlying how limbic FC regulates HPA axis stress reactivity and recovery. This highlights the importance of targeting acute stress reactivity and recovery separately in interventions for stress-related disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limbic functional connectivity during stress induction and post-stress rest regulates cortisol stress reactivity and recovery differently\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Luo ,&nbsp;Xiaolin Zhao ,&nbsp;Shuai Wang ,&nbsp;Kun Shi ,&nbsp;Jiahao Huang ,&nbsp;Juan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and its end-product cortisol play an important role in adaptation to stressful situations. Previous studies have suggested brain regions in the limbic area (e.g., basolateral amygdala-BLA, centromedial amygdala-CMA, hippocampus) regulate cortisol stress response (i.e., initial cortisol stress reactivity and a late recovery). However, whether these limbic areas regulate cortisol stress reactivity and recovery differently remains elusive. Using the Seed-to-Voxel gPPI analysis, we explored the functional connectivity (FC) between the limbic area and other brain regions during stress induction and their association with cortisol stress reactivity. Similarly, we explored their FC during post-stress rest and their association with cortisol stress recovery. We found that both BLA and CMA connectivity related to cortisol stress reactivity during stress induction, with similarity in FC with precuneus and differences in FC with angular gyrus, precentral gyrus, and PFC; the BLA rather than CMA connectivity with PFC linked to cortisol stress recovery during post-stress rest. Furthermore, the hippocampal-PFC connectivity only affected cortisol stress recovery during post-stress rest, and in a different direction from the effect of BLA-PFC connectivity. Our findings provide important insight into the neurobiological etiology underlying how limbic FC regulates HPA axis stress reactivity and recovery. This highlights the importance of targeting acute stress reactivity and recovery separately in interventions for stress-related disorders.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051125001280\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051125001280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴及其终产物皮质醇在适应压力情境中起着重要作用。先前的研究表明,大脑边缘区域(如基底外侧杏仁核- bla、中央内侧杏仁核- cma、海马)调节皮质醇应激反应(即初始皮质醇应激反应和后期恢复)。然而,这些边缘区域是否以不同的方式调节皮质醇应激反应和恢复仍然难以捉摸。利用种子到体素的gPPI分析,我们探索了应激诱导过程中边缘区和其他大脑区域之间的功能连接(FC)及其与皮质醇应激反应的关系。同样,我们探索了他们在应激后休息期间的FC及其与皮质醇应激恢复的关系。我们发现,应激诱导过程中,BLA和CMA的连通性与皮质醇应激反应有关,FC与楔前叶相似,而FC与角回、中央前回和PFC存在差异;在应激后休息期间,与皮质醇应激恢复有关的是BLA而不是CMA与PFC的连接。此外,海马- pfc连接仅影响应激后休息期间皮质醇应激的恢复,并且与BLA-PFC连接的影响方向不同。我们的研究结果为边缘FC如何调节HPA轴应激反应和恢复的神经生物学病因提供了重要的见解。这突出了在压力相关疾病的干预中分别针对急性应激反应和恢复的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limbic functional connectivity during stress induction and post-stress rest regulates cortisol stress reactivity and recovery differently
The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and its end-product cortisol play an important role in adaptation to stressful situations. Previous studies have suggested brain regions in the limbic area (e.g., basolateral amygdala-BLA, centromedial amygdala-CMA, hippocampus) regulate cortisol stress response (i.e., initial cortisol stress reactivity and a late recovery). However, whether these limbic areas regulate cortisol stress reactivity and recovery differently remains elusive. Using the Seed-to-Voxel gPPI analysis, we explored the functional connectivity (FC) between the limbic area and other brain regions during stress induction and their association with cortisol stress reactivity. Similarly, we explored their FC during post-stress rest and their association with cortisol stress recovery. We found that both BLA and CMA connectivity related to cortisol stress reactivity during stress induction, with similarity in FC with precuneus and differences in FC with angular gyrus, precentral gyrus, and PFC; the BLA rather than CMA connectivity with PFC linked to cortisol stress recovery during post-stress rest. Furthermore, the hippocampal-PFC connectivity only affected cortisol stress recovery during post-stress rest, and in a different direction from the effect of BLA-PFC connectivity. Our findings provide important insight into the neurobiological etiology underlying how limbic FC regulates HPA axis stress reactivity and recovery. This highlights the importance of targeting acute stress reactivity and recovery separately in interventions for stress-related disorders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信