确定入室盗窃调查的相关采样地点

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Yoram R. Goedhart , Katharina Draxel , Androniki S.I. Katsikis , Ingrid Jullens , Anouk de Ronde , Bas Kokshoorn , Christianne J. de Poot
{"title":"确定入室盗窃调查的相关采样地点","authors":"Yoram R. Goedhart ,&nbsp;Katharina Draxel ,&nbsp;Androniki S.I. Katsikis ,&nbsp;Ingrid Jullens ,&nbsp;Anouk de Ronde ,&nbsp;Bas Kokshoorn ,&nbsp;Christianne J. de Poot","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residential burglaries often go unsolved, as collected DNA traces and fingermarks frequently originate from residents rather than the offender. It is therefore important to know how to target sampling locations that specifically relate to the burglary event. However, data that aid in assessing the likelihood of a burglar touching certain surfaces, and, consequently leaving trace evidence, is unavailable. Instead, forensic examiners rely primarily on their personal experience and expertise to determine where burglary-related traces are most likely to be found.</div><div>The current study aims to identify specific areas that are contacted during different types of interactions with points of entry. An experiment was conducted at a Dutch music festival, where participants simulated both a legitimate and burglary scenario. Using paint, the points of contact between the participants’ hands and the experimental set-up were recorded. The contact locations of all participants were combined using heatmaps to reveal the patterns of contact. We found that different burglary methods lead to distinct contact patterns, indicating specific areas where traces are most likely to be deposited. Our findings can support forensic examiners in making evidence-based decisions during search strategies in burglary investigations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 112615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of relevant sampling locations for burglary investigations\",\"authors\":\"Yoram R. Goedhart ,&nbsp;Katharina Draxel ,&nbsp;Androniki S.I. Katsikis ,&nbsp;Ingrid Jullens ,&nbsp;Anouk de Ronde ,&nbsp;Bas Kokshoorn ,&nbsp;Christianne J. de Poot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Residential burglaries often go unsolved, as collected DNA traces and fingermarks frequently originate from residents rather than the offender. It is therefore important to know how to target sampling locations that specifically relate to the burglary event. However, data that aid in assessing the likelihood of a burglar touching certain surfaces, and, consequently leaving trace evidence, is unavailable. Instead, forensic examiners rely primarily on their personal experience and expertise to determine where burglary-related traces are most likely to be found.</div><div>The current study aims to identify specific areas that are contacted during different types of interactions with points of entry. An experiment was conducted at a Dutch music festival, where participants simulated both a legitimate and burglary scenario. Using paint, the points of contact between the participants’ hands and the experimental set-up were recorded. The contact locations of all participants were combined using heatmaps to reveal the patterns of contact. We found that different burglary methods lead to distinct contact patterns, indicating specific areas where traces are most likely to be deposited. Our findings can support forensic examiners in making evidence-based decisions during search strategies in burglary investigations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic science international\",\"volume\":\"377 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic science international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825002531\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825002531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住宅盗窃案往往无法侦破,因为收集到的DNA痕迹和指纹往往来自居民,而不是罪犯。因此,重要的是要知道如何目标采样地点,具体涉及入室盗窃事件。然而,帮助评估窃贼接触某些表面的可能性并因此留下痕迹证据的数据是不可用的。相反,法医主要依靠他们的个人经验和专业知识来确定最有可能在哪里找到与入室盗窃有关的痕迹。目前的研究旨在确定在与入口点的不同类型的互动中接触的特定区域。在荷兰音乐节上进行了一项实验,参与者分别模拟了合法和入室盗窃的场景。使用油漆,参与者的手和实验装置之间的接触点被记录下来。所有参与者的接触地点都用热图结合起来,以揭示接触的模式。我们发现,不同的入室盗窃方法会导致不同的接触模式,指出最有可能留下痕迹的特定区域。我们的研究结果可以为法医在入室盗窃调查中制定基于证据的搜索策略提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of relevant sampling locations for burglary investigations
Residential burglaries often go unsolved, as collected DNA traces and fingermarks frequently originate from residents rather than the offender. It is therefore important to know how to target sampling locations that specifically relate to the burglary event. However, data that aid in assessing the likelihood of a burglar touching certain surfaces, and, consequently leaving trace evidence, is unavailable. Instead, forensic examiners rely primarily on their personal experience and expertise to determine where burglary-related traces are most likely to be found.
The current study aims to identify specific areas that are contacted during different types of interactions with points of entry. An experiment was conducted at a Dutch music festival, where participants simulated both a legitimate and burglary scenario. Using paint, the points of contact between the participants’ hands and the experimental set-up were recorded. The contact locations of all participants were combined using heatmaps to reveal the patterns of contact. We found that different burglary methods lead to distinct contact patterns, indicating specific areas where traces are most likely to be deposited. Our findings can support forensic examiners in making evidence-based decisions during search strategies in burglary investigations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信