Yannick Stephan , Angelina R. Sutin , René Mõttus , Martina Luchetti , Páraic O'Súilleabháin , Antonio Terracciano
{"title":"性格差异与死亡风险:四个纵向样本的协调分析","authors":"Yannick Stephan , Angelina R. Sutin , René Mõttus , Martina Luchetti , Páraic O'Súilleabháin , Antonio Terracciano","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Personality nuances constitute the most specific level of the personality trait hierarchy and are often operationalized by individual questionnaire items. We examine whether these items are related to mortality to identify which specific personality characteristics are most related to length of life.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Participants (<em>N</em> > 22,000) from the Health and Retirement Study, the Midlife in the United States Study, the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, and the National Health and Aging Trends Study completed 26-, 25-, 21- or 10-item measures of the Big Five personality traits using the Midlife Development Inventory. Mortality was tracked between 6 and 28 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across most samples and meta-analyses, higher neuroticism domain and item scores were related to a higher mortality risk, whereas higher extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness domain and item scores were associated with a lower mortality risk. Less consistent associations were found for the openness domain and items. The extraversion item “active” had the strongest association with lower mortality risk (pooled hazard ratios [HR] = 0.79, 95 %CI = 0.73–0.85), followed by “lively” (extraversion), “organized”, “responsible”, “hardworking”, and “thorough” (conscientiousness), and “helpful” (agreeableness) (HRs range from 0.87 to 0.91). These associations were partially accounted for by clinical, behavioral, and psychological factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This research deconstructs the five broad domains to identify the nuances most related to longevity. Specific personality items have replicable associations with mortality but little incremental predictive power compared to the corresponding domain. Still, the aggregated predictive value of items was stronger compared to the five broad personality domains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 112347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality nuances and mortality risk: A coordinated analysis of four longitudinal samples\",\"authors\":\"Yannick Stephan , Angelina R. Sutin , René Mõttus , Martina Luchetti , Páraic O'Súilleabháin , Antonio Terracciano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Personality nuances constitute the most specific level of the personality trait hierarchy and are often operationalized by individual questionnaire items. We examine whether these items are related to mortality to identify which specific personality characteristics are most related to length of life.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Participants (<em>N</em> > 22,000) from the Health and Retirement Study, the Midlife in the United States Study, the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, and the National Health and Aging Trends Study completed 26-, 25-, 21- or 10-item measures of the Big Five personality traits using the Midlife Development Inventory. Mortality was tracked between 6 and 28 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across most samples and meta-analyses, higher neuroticism domain and item scores were related to a higher mortality risk, whereas higher extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness domain and item scores were associated with a lower mortality risk. Less consistent associations were found for the openness domain and items. The extraversion item “active” had the strongest association with lower mortality risk (pooled hazard ratios [HR] = 0.79, 95 %CI = 0.73–0.85), followed by “lively” (extraversion), “organized”, “responsible”, “hardworking”, and “thorough” (conscientiousness), and “helpful” (agreeableness) (HRs range from 0.87 to 0.91). These associations were partially accounted for by clinical, behavioral, and psychological factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This research deconstructs the five broad domains to identify the nuances most related to longevity. Specific personality items have replicable associations with mortality but little incremental predictive power compared to the corresponding domain. Still, the aggregated predictive value of items was stronger compared to the five broad personality domains.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925003113\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925003113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的人格细微差别构成了人格特质层次结构中最具体的层次,并且经常被单个问卷项目操作化。我们检查这些项目是否与死亡率有关,以确定哪些特定的人格特征与寿命最相关。方法来自健康与退休研究、美国中年研究、国家社会生活、健康与老龄化项目和国家健康与老龄化趋势研究的参与者(N > 22,000)使用中年发展量表完成了26项、25项、21项或10项的五大人格特征测量。死亡率在6至28岁之间进行追踪。结果在大多数样本和荟萃分析中,较高的神经质领域和项目得分与较高的死亡风险相关,而较高的外向性、宜人性和尽责性领域和项目得分与较低的死亡风险相关。开放域和项目之间的关联不太一致。外向性项目“活跃”与较低的死亡风险相关性最强(合并风险比[HR] = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.73-0.85),其次是“活泼”(外向性)、“有组织”、“负责”、“勤奋”、“彻底”(尽责性)和“乐于助人”(随和性)(HR范围为0.87至0.91)。这些关联部分是由临床、行为和心理因素造成的。本研究解构了五大领域,以确定与长寿最相关的细微差别。特定的人格项目与死亡率有可复制的联系,但与相应的领域相比,预测能力很少。尽管如此,与五个广泛的人格领域相比,项目的综合预测价值更强。
Personality nuances and mortality risk: A coordinated analysis of four longitudinal samples
Objective
Personality nuances constitute the most specific level of the personality trait hierarchy and are often operationalized by individual questionnaire items. We examine whether these items are related to mortality to identify which specific personality characteristics are most related to length of life.
Method
Participants (N > 22,000) from the Health and Retirement Study, the Midlife in the United States Study, the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, and the National Health and Aging Trends Study completed 26-, 25-, 21- or 10-item measures of the Big Five personality traits using the Midlife Development Inventory. Mortality was tracked between 6 and 28 years.
Results
Across most samples and meta-analyses, higher neuroticism domain and item scores were related to a higher mortality risk, whereas higher extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness domain and item scores were associated with a lower mortality risk. Less consistent associations were found for the openness domain and items. The extraversion item “active” had the strongest association with lower mortality risk (pooled hazard ratios [HR] = 0.79, 95 %CI = 0.73–0.85), followed by “lively” (extraversion), “organized”, “responsible”, “hardworking”, and “thorough” (conscientiousness), and “helpful” (agreeableness) (HRs range from 0.87 to 0.91). These associations were partially accounted for by clinical, behavioral, and psychological factors.
Conclusion
This research deconstructs the five broad domains to identify the nuances most related to longevity. Specific personality items have replicable associations with mortality but little incremental predictive power compared to the corresponding domain. Still, the aggregated predictive value of items was stronger compared to the five broad personality domains.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.