Kathryn Ann Lee PhD, RN , Monica O’Reilly-Jacob PhD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAAN , Thuy Nguyen PhD, MPA , Deanna Marriott PhD , Deena Kelly Costa PhD, RN, FAAN , Marianne Weiss DNSc, RN , Olga Yakusheva PhD, FAAN(h)
{"title":"联邦医疗保险B部分报销和门诊执业护士和医生之间的服务量差异","authors":"Kathryn Ann Lee PhD, RN , Monica O’Reilly-Jacob PhD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAAN , Thuy Nguyen PhD, MPA , Deanna Marriott PhD , Deena Kelly Costa PhD, RN, FAAN , Marianne Weiss DNSc, RN , Olga Yakusheva PhD, FAAN(h)","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurse practitioners (NPs) increasingly deliver ambulatory care, yet state scope of practice (SoP) laws influence how their services are billed and utilized within Medicare.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare Medicare reimbursement and service volume for ambulatory NPs and physicians by state SoP regulations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed 100% of 2021 Medicare Part B claims, attributing claims to individual providers. Adjusted regression models estimated cost and service differentials by provider type and state SoP status.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>NPs in full SoP states had higher Medicare cost and more services per beneficiary than those in restricted states. Among physicians, cost and service volume did not differ by SoP.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Expanded practice authority for NPs increases access without reducing physician service delivery or reimbursement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>State SoP regulations shape ambulatory care delivery. Greater NP autonomy may improve system sustainability by increasing access to NP reimbursed services without shifting current physician reimbursement from Medicare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"73 6","pages":"Article 102523"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare Part B reimbursement and service volume differences between ambulatory nurse practitioners and physicians\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Ann Lee PhD, RN , Monica O’Reilly-Jacob PhD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAAN , Thuy Nguyen PhD, MPA , Deanna Marriott PhD , Deena Kelly Costa PhD, RN, FAAN , Marianne Weiss DNSc, RN , Olga Yakusheva PhD, FAAN(h)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurse practitioners (NPs) increasingly deliver ambulatory care, yet state scope of practice (SoP) laws influence how their services are billed and utilized within Medicare.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare Medicare reimbursement and service volume for ambulatory NPs and physicians by state SoP regulations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed 100% of 2021 Medicare Part B claims, attributing claims to individual providers. Adjusted regression models estimated cost and service differentials by provider type and state SoP status.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>NPs in full SoP states had higher Medicare cost and more services per beneficiary than those in restricted states. Among physicians, cost and service volume did not differ by SoP.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Expanded practice authority for NPs increases access without reducing physician service delivery or reimbursement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>State SoP regulations shape ambulatory care delivery. Greater NP autonomy may improve system sustainability by increasing access to NP reimbursed services without shifting current physician reimbursement from Medicare.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\"73 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655425001769\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655425001769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Medicare Part B reimbursement and service volume differences between ambulatory nurse practitioners and physicians
Background
Nurse practitioners (NPs) increasingly deliver ambulatory care, yet state scope of practice (SoP) laws influence how their services are billed and utilized within Medicare.
Purpose
To compare Medicare reimbursement and service volume for ambulatory NPs and physicians by state SoP regulations.
Methods
We analyzed 100% of 2021 Medicare Part B claims, attributing claims to individual providers. Adjusted regression models estimated cost and service differentials by provider type and state SoP status.
Findings
NPs in full SoP states had higher Medicare cost and more services per beneficiary than those in restricted states. Among physicians, cost and service volume did not differ by SoP.
Discussion
Expanded practice authority for NPs increases access without reducing physician service delivery or reimbursement.
Conclusions
State SoP regulations shape ambulatory care delivery. Greater NP autonomy may improve system sustainability by increasing access to NP reimbursed services without shifting current physician reimbursement from Medicare.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.