Qinhan Ye , Junze Zhang , Weiyi Sun , Shihui Gao , Prajal Pradhan , Shuai Wang , Bojie Fu
{"title":"协调可持续发展目标以减少灾害风险:来自中国的经验教训","authors":"Qinhan Ye , Junze Zhang , Weiyi Sun , Shihui Gao , Prajal Pradhan , Shuai Wang , Bojie Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with disaster risk—potential economic losses from natural hazards—reduction remains a critical yet daunting challenge. To address this knowledge gap, we evaluated the spatiotemporal dynamics of disaster risk across China, using a modified National Risk Index framework, with a focus on social vulnerability (i.e., susceptibility to disasters) and community resilience (i.e., capacity to adapt and recover). Spearman correlations were used to examine the magnitude and direction of relationships between SDG progress and disaster risk. Our results show that, nationally, China's disaster risk index fluctuated from being medium (11.62) in 2000 to low (3.83) in 2010, before rising again to a medium level of risk (16.22) in 2021. Crucially, the overall dynamic relationship between SDG progress and disaster risk is nonlinear. With greater progress in achieving SDGs, the disaster risk declines at first but then rebounds at the national scale, or it stabilizes at the provincial scale. We find that this pattern is driven chiefly by social vulnerability, given its similar trend to SDG progress, while community resilience increases linearly with SDG progress. Further, poverty reduction (SDG1) and quality education (SDG4) emerged as primary risk mitigators in the national scale analysis, contrasting sharply with the substantial variation in impactful SDGs among provinces. Hence, this study argues for a regionally tailored SDG prioritization strategy to prevent escalating potential economic losses from disasters triggered by natural hazards, emphasizing the dual optimization of sustainable development and risk governance frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105765"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergizing sustainable development goals for disaster risk reduction: Lessons from China\",\"authors\":\"Qinhan Ye , Junze Zhang , Weiyi Sun , Shihui Gao , Prajal Pradhan , Shuai Wang , Bojie Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Integrating progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with disaster risk—potential economic losses from natural hazards—reduction remains a critical yet daunting challenge. To address this knowledge gap, we evaluated the spatiotemporal dynamics of disaster risk across China, using a modified National Risk Index framework, with a focus on social vulnerability (i.e., susceptibility to disasters) and community resilience (i.e., capacity to adapt and recover). Spearman correlations were used to examine the magnitude and direction of relationships between SDG progress and disaster risk. Our results show that, nationally, China's disaster risk index fluctuated from being medium (11.62) in 2000 to low (3.83) in 2010, before rising again to a medium level of risk (16.22) in 2021. Crucially, the overall dynamic relationship between SDG progress and disaster risk is nonlinear. With greater progress in achieving SDGs, the disaster risk declines at first but then rebounds at the national scale, or it stabilizes at the provincial scale. We find that this pattern is driven chiefly by social vulnerability, given its similar trend to SDG progress, while community resilience increases linearly with SDG progress. Further, poverty reduction (SDG1) and quality education (SDG4) emerged as primary risk mitigators in the national scale analysis, contrasting sharply with the substantial variation in impactful SDGs among provinces. Hence, this study argues for a regionally tailored SDG prioritization strategy to prevent escalating potential economic losses from disasters triggered by natural hazards, emphasizing the dual optimization of sustainable development and risk governance frameworks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005898\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005898","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synergizing sustainable development goals for disaster risk reduction: Lessons from China
Integrating progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with disaster risk—potential economic losses from natural hazards—reduction remains a critical yet daunting challenge. To address this knowledge gap, we evaluated the spatiotemporal dynamics of disaster risk across China, using a modified National Risk Index framework, with a focus on social vulnerability (i.e., susceptibility to disasters) and community resilience (i.e., capacity to adapt and recover). Spearman correlations were used to examine the magnitude and direction of relationships between SDG progress and disaster risk. Our results show that, nationally, China's disaster risk index fluctuated from being medium (11.62) in 2000 to low (3.83) in 2010, before rising again to a medium level of risk (16.22) in 2021. Crucially, the overall dynamic relationship between SDG progress and disaster risk is nonlinear. With greater progress in achieving SDGs, the disaster risk declines at first but then rebounds at the national scale, or it stabilizes at the provincial scale. We find that this pattern is driven chiefly by social vulnerability, given its similar trend to SDG progress, while community resilience increases linearly with SDG progress. Further, poverty reduction (SDG1) and quality education (SDG4) emerged as primary risk mitigators in the national scale analysis, contrasting sharply with the substantial variation in impactful SDGs among provinces. Hence, this study argues for a regionally tailored SDG prioritization strategy to prevent escalating potential economic losses from disasters triggered by natural hazards, emphasizing the dual optimization of sustainable development and risk governance frameworks.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.