澳大利亚新南威尔士州阿片类药物依赖治疗诊所临床医生对药用大麻的态度和知识

IF 4.3 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Laila Parvaresh, Llewellyn Mills, Jaleh Gholami, Louisa Jansen, Nazila Jamshidi, Kate Baker, Christopher Tremonti, Marguerite Tracy, Adrian Dunlop, Nicholas Lintzeris
{"title":"澳大利亚新南威尔士州阿片类药物依赖治疗诊所临床医生对药用大麻的态度和知识","authors":"Laila Parvaresh, Llewellyn Mills, Jaleh Gholami, Louisa Jansen, Nazila Jamshidi, Kate Baker, Christopher Tremonti, Marguerite Tracy, Adrian Dunlop, Nicholas Lintzeris","doi":"10.1186/s42238-025-00315-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no prior studies investigating the attitudes and knowledge of opioid treatment program (OTP) clinicians on prescribed medicinal cannabis in OTP clients. This study examined the OTP clinicians' medicinal cannabis experience, knowledge, concerns, and educational needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Staff from six public OTP services in New South Wales completed a medicinal cannabis survey. Staff included nurses, doctors, pharmacists, allied health, and consumer workers. Single-level regression models were used to estimate participants' sex, role, and year of experience effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>102 (63%) clinicians responded to the medicinal cannabis part of the survey, mostly female (n = 58, 56.9%), and more than half worked full-time (n = 54, 52.9%). Most of the participants (88.5%, 85/96) lacked experience providing medicinal cannabis, two in three (66.7%, 68/102) agreed to consider medicinal cannabis as a treatment for addressing cannabis use in OTP clients. Over 70% (71.5%, 73/102) expressed similar agreement to consider medicinal cannabis for other health conditions in OTP clients. More than half of the clinicians (54.2%, 52/96) expressed a lack of confidence in assisting clients with accessing medicinal cannabis, and were unfamiliar with current regulations (56.2%, 54/96). Clinicians expressed safety concerns regarding side effects such as driving-related problems (74%, 71/96), cognitive impairment (54.2%, 52/96), and cannabis dependence (54.2%, 52/96). The three conditions most endorsed as having sufficient evidence to support the use of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-based medicinal cannabis were palliative care symptom management (72.4%, 71/98), chronic pain (67.4%, 66/98), and multiple sclerosis (43.8%, 43/98). The three conditions most identified as having sufficient evidence to support the routine clinical use of cannabidiol (CBD)-based medicinal cannabis were chronic pain (64.9%, 63/97), palliative care (62.5%, 60/96), and sleep problems (44.8%, 43/96). The most common educational needs identified by participants were the evidence for the effectiveness of medicinal cannabis in cannabis dependence treatment (88.5%, 85/96), other health conditions (87.5%, 84/96), and indications and contraindications for using medicinal cannabis (87.5%, 84/96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the interest in using medicinal cannabis for treating cannabis dependence and /or other health conditions, clinicians identified several barriers including limited experience, lack of confidence, and poor understanding of the regulatory framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":"7 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians' attitudes and knowledge of medicinal cannabis in opioid dependence treatment clinics in New South Wales, Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Laila Parvaresh, Llewellyn Mills, Jaleh Gholami, Louisa Jansen, Nazila Jamshidi, Kate Baker, Christopher Tremonti, Marguerite Tracy, Adrian Dunlop, Nicholas Lintzeris\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42238-025-00315-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no prior studies investigating the attitudes and knowledge of opioid treatment program (OTP) clinicians on prescribed medicinal cannabis in OTP clients. This study examined the OTP clinicians' medicinal cannabis experience, knowledge, concerns, and educational needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Staff from six public OTP services in New South Wales completed a medicinal cannabis survey. Staff included nurses, doctors, pharmacists, allied health, and consumer workers. Single-level regression models were used to estimate participants' sex, role, and year of experience effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>102 (63%) clinicians responded to the medicinal cannabis part of the survey, mostly female (n = 58, 56.9%), and more than half worked full-time (n = 54, 52.9%). Most of the participants (88.5%, 85/96) lacked experience providing medicinal cannabis, two in three (66.7%, 68/102) agreed to consider medicinal cannabis as a treatment for addressing cannabis use in OTP clients. Over 70% (71.5%, 73/102) expressed similar agreement to consider medicinal cannabis for other health conditions in OTP clients. More than half of the clinicians (54.2%, 52/96) expressed a lack of confidence in assisting clients with accessing medicinal cannabis, and were unfamiliar with current regulations (56.2%, 54/96). Clinicians expressed safety concerns regarding side effects such as driving-related problems (74%, 71/96), cognitive impairment (54.2%, 52/96), and cannabis dependence (54.2%, 52/96). The three conditions most endorsed as having sufficient evidence to support the use of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-based medicinal cannabis were palliative care symptom management (72.4%, 71/98), chronic pain (67.4%, 66/98), and multiple sclerosis (43.8%, 43/98). The three conditions most identified as having sufficient evidence to support the routine clinical use of cannabidiol (CBD)-based medicinal cannabis were chronic pain (64.9%, 63/97), palliative care (62.5%, 60/96), and sleep problems (44.8%, 43/96). The most common educational needs identified by participants were the evidence for the effectiveness of medicinal cannabis in cannabis dependence treatment (88.5%, 85/96), other health conditions (87.5%, 84/96), and indications and contraindications for using medicinal cannabis (87.5%, 84/96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the interest in using medicinal cannabis for treating cannabis dependence and /or other health conditions, clinicians identified several barriers including limited experience, lack of confidence, and poor understanding of the regulatory framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cannabis research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357479/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cannabis research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00315-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00315-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:之前没有研究调查阿片类药物治疗项目(OTP)临床医生对OTP客户处方药用大麻的态度和知识。本研究考察了OTP临床医生的药用大麻经验、知识、关注点和教育需求。方法:来自新南威尔士州6个公共服务机构的工作人员完成了一项药用大麻调查。工作人员包括护士、医生、药剂师、专职保健人员和消费者工作者。使用单水平回归模型来估计参与者的性别、角色和经验年效应。结果:102名(63%)临床医生回应了调查的药用大麻部分,其中大多数是女性(n = 58, 56.9%),一半以上是全职工作(n = 54, 52.9%)。大多数参与者(88.5%,85/96)缺乏提供药用大麻的经验,三分之二(66.7%,68/102)同意考虑将药用大麻作为解决OTP客户大麻使用问题的一种治疗方法。超过70%(71.5%,73/102)的受访者表示同意考虑将医用大麻用于门诊客户的其他健康状况。超过一半的临床医生(54.2%,52/96)表示对协助客户获取医用大麻缺乏信心,并且不熟悉现行法规(56.2%,54/96)。临床医生表达了对副作用的安全担忧,如驾驶相关问题(74%,71/96)、认知障碍(54.2%,52/96)和大麻依赖(54.2%,52/96)。有充分证据支持使用四氢大麻酚(THC)为基础的药用大麻的三个条件是姑息治疗症状管理(72.4%,71/98)、慢性疼痛(67.4%,66/98)和多发性硬化症(43.8%,43/98)。被认为有足够证据支持常规临床使用大麻二酚(CBD)的三种情况是慢性疼痛(64.9%,63/97)、姑息治疗(62.5%,60/96)和睡眠问题(44.8%,43/96)。参与者确定的最常见的教育需求是药用大麻在大麻依赖治疗中有效性的证据(88.5%,85/96)、其他健康状况(87.5%,84/96)以及使用药用大麻的指征和禁禁症(87.5%,84/96)。结论:尽管有兴趣使用药用大麻治疗大麻依赖和/或其他健康状况,但临床医生发现了一些障碍,包括经验有限、缺乏信心和对监管框架的了解不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinicians' attitudes and knowledge of medicinal cannabis in opioid dependence treatment clinics in New South Wales, Australia.

Background: There are no prior studies investigating the attitudes and knowledge of opioid treatment program (OTP) clinicians on prescribed medicinal cannabis in OTP clients. This study examined the OTP clinicians' medicinal cannabis experience, knowledge, concerns, and educational needs.

Methods: Staff from six public OTP services in New South Wales completed a medicinal cannabis survey. Staff included nurses, doctors, pharmacists, allied health, and consumer workers. Single-level regression models were used to estimate participants' sex, role, and year of experience effect.

Results: 102 (63%) clinicians responded to the medicinal cannabis part of the survey, mostly female (n = 58, 56.9%), and more than half worked full-time (n = 54, 52.9%). Most of the participants (88.5%, 85/96) lacked experience providing medicinal cannabis, two in three (66.7%, 68/102) agreed to consider medicinal cannabis as a treatment for addressing cannabis use in OTP clients. Over 70% (71.5%, 73/102) expressed similar agreement to consider medicinal cannabis for other health conditions in OTP clients. More than half of the clinicians (54.2%, 52/96) expressed a lack of confidence in assisting clients with accessing medicinal cannabis, and were unfamiliar with current regulations (56.2%, 54/96). Clinicians expressed safety concerns regarding side effects such as driving-related problems (74%, 71/96), cognitive impairment (54.2%, 52/96), and cannabis dependence (54.2%, 52/96). The three conditions most endorsed as having sufficient evidence to support the use of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-based medicinal cannabis were palliative care symptom management (72.4%, 71/98), chronic pain (67.4%, 66/98), and multiple sclerosis (43.8%, 43/98). The three conditions most identified as having sufficient evidence to support the routine clinical use of cannabidiol (CBD)-based medicinal cannabis were chronic pain (64.9%, 63/97), palliative care (62.5%, 60/96), and sleep problems (44.8%, 43/96). The most common educational needs identified by participants were the evidence for the effectiveness of medicinal cannabis in cannabis dependence treatment (88.5%, 85/96), other health conditions (87.5%, 84/96), and indications and contraindications for using medicinal cannabis (87.5%, 84/96).

Conclusion: Despite the interest in using medicinal cannabis for treating cannabis dependence and /or other health conditions, clinicians identified several barriers including limited experience, lack of confidence, and poor understanding of the regulatory framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信