不同儿童哮喘定义对发病率和临床结果的影响。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Amir Ghabousian, Gisele N Bezerra, Zhaozhong Zhu, Janice A Espinola, Ashley F Sullivan, Carlos A Camargo
{"title":"不同儿童哮喘定义对发病率和临床结果的影响。","authors":"Amir Ghabousian, Gisele N Bezerra, Zhaozhong Zhu, Janice A Espinola, Ashley F Sullivan, Carlos A Camargo","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2025.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The absence of a standardized asthma definition in epidemiologic studies undermines the consistency of incidence estimates and the comparability of clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of integrating bronchodilator response (BDR) into parent-reported asthma definitions by comparing incidence, disease severity, control, and diagnostic performance across these definitions, and to assess the individual diagnostic performance of BDR and fractional exhaled nitric oxide in identifying asthma cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a prospective cohort of 919 infants with severe (hospitalized) bronchiolitis to explore 4 asthma definitions: (1) broad, any physician diagnosis of asthma by age 6 years, as reported by parents; (2) epidemiologic, definition 1 plus either asthma medication use (eg, inhaled bronchodilator, inhaled corticosteroid, systemic corticosteroid, and montelukast) or asthma-related symptoms between ages 5.0 and 5.9 years; (3) alternative strict, definition 2 plus a post-BDR increase of 8% or greater in predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second; and (4) strict, definition 2 plus a post-bronchodilator increase of more than 10% in predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Outcomes were assessed across these definitions, and their diagnostic performance was compared with a physician reviewer's asthma diagnosis (reference standard).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rates for the 4 definitions were 37.2%, 27.7%, 13.2%, and 9.3%, respectively, with intermittent asthma severity classification following a similar pattern (72.4%, 65.5%, 56.0%, and 52.8%). Transitioning from the first to the fourth definition improved specificity and positive predictive value but reduced sensitivity, with no consistent trends being observed for asthma control across definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that incorporating BDR into parent-reported asthma definitions underestimates asthma incidence and identifies cases with worse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of varying childhood asthma definitions on incidence and clinical outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Ghabousian, Gisele N Bezerra, Zhaozhong Zhu, Janice A Espinola, Ashley F Sullivan, Carlos A Camargo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anai.2025.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The absence of a standardized asthma definition in epidemiologic studies undermines the consistency of incidence estimates and the comparability of clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of integrating bronchodilator response (BDR) into parent-reported asthma definitions by comparing incidence, disease severity, control, and diagnostic performance across these definitions, and to assess the individual diagnostic performance of BDR and fractional exhaled nitric oxide in identifying asthma cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a prospective cohort of 919 infants with severe (hospitalized) bronchiolitis to explore 4 asthma definitions: (1) broad, any physician diagnosis of asthma by age 6 years, as reported by parents; (2) epidemiologic, definition 1 plus either asthma medication use (eg, inhaled bronchodilator, inhaled corticosteroid, systemic corticosteroid, and montelukast) or asthma-related symptoms between ages 5.0 and 5.9 years; (3) alternative strict, definition 2 plus a post-BDR increase of 8% or greater in predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second; and (4) strict, definition 2 plus a post-bronchodilator increase of more than 10% in predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Outcomes were assessed across these definitions, and their diagnostic performance was compared with a physician reviewer's asthma diagnosis (reference standard).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rates for the 4 definitions were 37.2%, 27.7%, 13.2%, and 9.3%, respectively, with intermittent asthma severity classification following a similar pattern (72.4%, 65.5%, 56.0%, and 52.8%). Transitioning from the first to the fourth definition improved specificity and positive predictive value but reduced sensitivity, with no consistent trends being observed for asthma control across definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that incorporating BDR into parent-reported asthma definitions underestimates asthma incidence and identifies cases with worse clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.08.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.08.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:流行病学研究中缺乏标准化的哮喘定义破坏了发病率估计的一致性和临床结果的可比性。目的:我们通过比较这些定义的发病率、疾病严重程度、控制和诊断表现,评估将支气管扩张剂反应(BDR)纳入父母报告的哮喘定义的影响。我们还评估了BDR和分数呼气一氧化氮(FeNO)在识别哮喘病例中的个体诊断性能。方法:我们利用919例重症(住院)毛细支气管炎婴儿的前瞻性队列数据,探讨四种哮喘定义:1)广泛的,任何医生诊断的哮喘,在6岁时,由父母报告;2)流行病学,定义1加上哮喘药物使用(例如,吸入支气管扩张剂、吸入皮质类固醇、全身皮质类固醇、孟鲁司特)或哮喘相关症状,年龄在5.0-5.9岁之间;3)另一种严格的定义2加上支气管扩张剂后预测1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)增加≥8%;4)严格定义2加上支气管扩张剂后预测FEV1增加10%。通过这些定义评估结果,并将其诊断性能与医师审稿人的哮喘诊断(参考标准)进行比较。结果:四种定义的发病率分别为37.2%、27.7%、13.2%和9.3%,间歇性哮喘的严重程度分类也有相似的模式(72.4%、65.5%、56.0%和52.8%)。从第一种定义过渡到第四种定义提高了特异性和阳性预测值,但降低了敏感性,在不同定义的哮喘控制方面没有观察到一致的趋势。结论:这些发现表明,将BDR纳入父母报告的哮喘定义低估了哮喘发病率,并识别出临床结果较差的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of varying childhood asthma definitions on incidence and clinical outcomes.

Background: The absence of a standardized asthma definition in epidemiologic studies undermines the consistency of incidence estimates and the comparability of clinical outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of integrating bronchodilator response (BDR) into parent-reported asthma definitions by comparing incidence, disease severity, control, and diagnostic performance across these definitions, and to assess the individual diagnostic performance of BDR and fractional exhaled nitric oxide in identifying asthma cases.

Methods: We used data from a prospective cohort of 919 infants with severe (hospitalized) bronchiolitis to explore 4 asthma definitions: (1) broad, any physician diagnosis of asthma by age 6 years, as reported by parents; (2) epidemiologic, definition 1 plus either asthma medication use (eg, inhaled bronchodilator, inhaled corticosteroid, systemic corticosteroid, and montelukast) or asthma-related symptoms between ages 5.0 and 5.9 years; (3) alternative strict, definition 2 plus a post-BDR increase of 8% or greater in predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second; and (4) strict, definition 2 plus a post-bronchodilator increase of more than 10% in predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Outcomes were assessed across these definitions, and their diagnostic performance was compared with a physician reviewer's asthma diagnosis (reference standard).

Results: The incidence rates for the 4 definitions were 37.2%, 27.7%, 13.2%, and 9.3%, respectively, with intermittent asthma severity classification following a similar pattern (72.4%, 65.5%, 56.0%, and 52.8%). Transitioning from the first to the fourth definition improved specificity and positive predictive value but reduced sensitivity, with no consistent trends being observed for asthma control across definitions.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that incorporating BDR into parent-reported asthma definitions underestimates asthma incidence and identifies cases with worse clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信