Daniel Kedar, Ortal Nachum, Arik Zaretski, Yoav Barnea
{"title":"以色列患者保守乳房治疗后乳房水肿的发生率","authors":"Daniel Kedar, Ortal Nachum, Arik Zaretski, Yoav Barnea","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast edema, characterized by fluid accumulation in breast tissue, is a common yet understudied complication following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy for breast cancer. Its impact on physical and emotional well-being highlights the need for deeper exploration of its prevalence, risk factors, and clinical management.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence of breast edema following breast surgery, investigate its association with arm lymphedema, and explore links to surgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 105 breast cancer patients treated with BCS and axillary interventions, including sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), lymph node sampling, or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Comprehensive evaluations included physical exams, arm circumference measurements, and a thorough review of patient demographics, medical history, and disease progression to assess the presence and severity of breast and arm lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breast edema prevalence was 7.6%, with rates significantly influenced by surgical extent. None of the SLNB patients exhibited breast edema, compared to 23.5% of ALND patients. Significant predictors included arm lymphedema (OR 57.54, P = 0.024), body mass index (OR 0.65, P = 0.016), and tumor grade (OR 51.78, P = 0.040). Co-occurrence of breast and arm lymphedema was observed in 50% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breast edema is a significant postoperative complication influenced by surgical extent and lymphatic disruption. Improved diagnostic methods, multidisciplinary care, and innovative surgical strategies are essential for mitigating this condition and enhancing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50268,"journal":{"name":"Israel Medical Association Journal","volume":"27 8","pages":"515-519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Breast Edema Following Conservative Breast Therapy in Israeli Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Kedar, Ortal Nachum, Arik Zaretski, Yoav Barnea\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast edema, characterized by fluid accumulation in breast tissue, is a common yet understudied complication following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy for breast cancer. Its impact on physical and emotional well-being highlights the need for deeper exploration of its prevalence, risk factors, and clinical management.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence of breast edema following breast surgery, investigate its association with arm lymphedema, and explore links to surgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 105 breast cancer patients treated with BCS and axillary interventions, including sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), lymph node sampling, or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Comprehensive evaluations included physical exams, arm circumference measurements, and a thorough review of patient demographics, medical history, and disease progression to assess the presence and severity of breast and arm lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breast edema prevalence was 7.6%, with rates significantly influenced by surgical extent. None of the SLNB patients exhibited breast edema, compared to 23.5% of ALND patients. Significant predictors included arm lymphedema (OR 57.54, P = 0.024), body mass index (OR 0.65, P = 0.016), and tumor grade (OR 51.78, P = 0.040). Co-occurrence of breast and arm lymphedema was observed in 50% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breast edema is a significant postoperative complication influenced by surgical extent and lymphatic disruption. Improved diagnostic methods, multidisciplinary care, and innovative surgical strategies are essential for mitigating this condition and enhancing patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 8\",\"pages\":\"515-519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:乳房水肿,以乳腺组织积液为特征,是乳腺癌保乳手术(BCS)和放疗后常见的并发症,但尚未得到充分研究。它对身体和情绪健康的影响突出了对其流行程度、风险因素和临床管理进行更深入探索的必要性。目的:评估乳房手术后乳房水肿的患病率,调查其与手臂淋巴水肿的关系,并探讨与手术干预的联系。方法:我们分析了105例接受BCS和腋窝干预治疗的乳腺癌患者,包括前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)、淋巴结取样或腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)。综合评估包括体格检查、臂围测量、对患者人口统计学、病史和疾病进展的全面回顾,以评估乳房和手臂淋巴水肿的存在和严重程度。结果:乳房水肿患病率为7.6%,手术程度对其有显著影响。与23.5%的ALND患者相比,SLNB患者没有出现乳房水肿。显著预测因子包括手臂淋巴水肿(OR 57.54, P = 0.024)、身体质量指数(OR 0.65, P = 0.016)和肿瘤分级(OR 51.78, P = 0.040)。50%的病例同时出现乳房和上臂淋巴水肿。结论:乳房水肿是术后重要的并发症,受手术范围和淋巴破坏的影响。改进的诊断方法、多学科护理和创新的手术策略对于减轻这种情况和提高患者的预后至关重要。
Prevalence of Breast Edema Following Conservative Breast Therapy in Israeli Patients.
Background: Breast edema, characterized by fluid accumulation in breast tissue, is a common yet understudied complication following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy for breast cancer. Its impact on physical and emotional well-being highlights the need for deeper exploration of its prevalence, risk factors, and clinical management.
Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of breast edema following breast surgery, investigate its association with arm lymphedema, and explore links to surgical interventions.
Methods: We analyzed 105 breast cancer patients treated with BCS and axillary interventions, including sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), lymph node sampling, or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Comprehensive evaluations included physical exams, arm circumference measurements, and a thorough review of patient demographics, medical history, and disease progression to assess the presence and severity of breast and arm lymphedema.
Results: Breast edema prevalence was 7.6%, with rates significantly influenced by surgical extent. None of the SLNB patients exhibited breast edema, compared to 23.5% of ALND patients. Significant predictors included arm lymphedema (OR 57.54, P = 0.024), body mass index (OR 0.65, P = 0.016), and tumor grade (OR 51.78, P = 0.040). Co-occurrence of breast and arm lymphedema was observed in 50% of cases.
Conclusions: Breast edema is a significant postoperative complication influenced by surgical extent and lymphatic disruption. Improved diagnostic methods, multidisciplinary care, and innovative surgical strategies are essential for mitigating this condition and enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), representing medical sciences and medicine in Israel, is published in English by the Israel Medical Association.
The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) was initiated in 1999.