抗血管内皮生长因子注射后黄斑裂孔的研究进展。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Vivian Rajeswaren, Vichar Trivedi, Pradeepa Yoganathan
{"title":"抗血管内皮生长因子注射后黄斑裂孔的研究进展。","authors":"Vivian Rajeswaren, Vichar Trivedi, Pradeepa Yoganathan","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections are a crucial treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). However, each injection carries the risk of complications, including macular hole (MH) formation. A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases identified studies reporting MH formation after anti-VEGF injections for nvAMD. Demographic characteristics included age, sex and affected eye. The presence of intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), posterior vitreous detachment, epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), vitreomacular traction (VMT), and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tears was recorded. This review includes 15 articles, encompassing 50 eyes. Median patient age was 76.0 years, and 54% were female. Prior to MH formation, SRF and PED were present in 68% of eyes. VMA or VMT was observed in 36% of eyes and the median number of injections before MH development was 3, with a median time to diagnosis of 60 days. While anti-VEGF is an essential therapy, clinicians must be aware of the risk of MH. Predisposing factors including PEDs, VMT, and significant intra- or subretinal fluid, should be considered. Further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms and explore preventative strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macular hole after anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth factor injection: A review.\",\"authors\":\"Vivian Rajeswaren, Vichar Trivedi, Pradeepa Yoganathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections are a crucial treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). However, each injection carries the risk of complications, including macular hole (MH) formation. A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases identified studies reporting MH formation after anti-VEGF injections for nvAMD. Demographic characteristics included age, sex and affected eye. The presence of intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), posterior vitreous detachment, epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), vitreomacular traction (VMT), and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tears was recorded. This review includes 15 articles, encompassing 50 eyes. Median patient age was 76.0 years, and 54% were female. Prior to MH formation, SRF and PED were present in 68% of eyes. VMA or VMT was observed in 36% of eyes and the median number of injections before MH development was 3, with a median time to diagnosis of 60 days. While anti-VEGF is an essential therapy, clinicians must be aware of the risk of MH. Predisposing factors including PEDs, VMT, and significant intra- or subretinal fluid, should be considered. Further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms and explore preventative strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.08.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)注射是新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nvAMD)的重要治疗方法。然而,每次注射都有并发症的风险,包括黄斑孔(MH)的形成。通过对PubMed、Embase和谷歌Scholar数据库的综合文献检索,发现了一些报告抗vegf注射治疗nvAMD后形成MH的研究。人口统计学特征包括年龄、性别和患眼。记录视网膜内液、视网膜下液(SRF)、色素上皮脱离(PED)、玻璃体后脱离、视网膜前膜、玻璃体黄斑粘连(VMA)、玻璃体黄斑牵引(VMT)和视网膜色素上皮(RPE)撕裂的存在。本综述包括15篇文章,涉及50只眼睛。患者中位年龄为76.0岁,女性占54%。在MH形成之前,68%的眼睛存在SRF和PED。36%的眼睛观察到VMA或VMT, MH发生前的中位注射次数为3次,诊断的中位时间为60天。虽然抗vegf是一种必要的治疗方法,但临床医生必须意识到MH的风险。应考虑包括PEDs、VMT和大量视网膜内或下积液在内的易感因素。需要进一步研究以充分了解其机制并探索预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Macular hole after anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth factor injection: A review.

Introduction: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections are a crucial treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). However, each injection carries the risk of complications, including macular hole (MH) formation. A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases identified studies reporting MH formation after anti-VEGF injections for nvAMD. Demographic characteristics included age, sex and affected eye. The presence of intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), posterior vitreous detachment, epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), vitreomacular traction (VMT), and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tears was recorded. This review includes 15 articles, encompassing 50 eyes. Median patient age was 76.0 years, and 54% were female. Prior to MH formation, SRF and PED were present in 68% of eyes. VMA or VMT was observed in 36% of eyes and the median number of injections before MH development was 3, with a median time to diagnosis of 60 days. While anti-VEGF is an essential therapy, clinicians must be aware of the risk of MH. Predisposing factors including PEDs, VMT, and significant intra- or subretinal fluid, should be considered. Further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms and explore preventative strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信