Jiajing Fu, Zhaoli Zhang, Yi Xu, Liuhu Han, Huimin Fan, Yao Lu
{"title":"与认知状态相关的血脂特征和降脂药物靶点的孟德尔随机化分析。","authors":"Jiajing Fu, Zhaoli Zhang, Yi Xu, Liuhu Han, Huimin Fan, Yao Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment is increasingly prevalent among older adults, posing a major public health challenge. While lipid-lowering medications are widely used to manage dyslipidemia in this population, the causal relationship between lipid levels and cognitive function remains unclear. This study investigates genetically- predicted lipid traits, lipid-lowering drug-targets, and their associations with cognitive status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genetic variants associated with lipid features or lipid-lowering drug-targets were identified using data from the GLGC. Cognitive summary statistics were obtained from six independent GWAS datasets. Significant drug-targets were further assessed using SMR and co-localization to account for potential confounding effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant associations were found between lipid traits or eight of the nine lipid-reducing drug-targets and cognitive outcomes. However, genetic inhibition of NPC1L1 was associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment across three distinct datasets (β1 = -0.191 [95 % CI: -0.307 to -0.075], p = 0.023; β2 = -0.288 [95 % CI: -0.394 to -0.182], p = 5.616 × 10<sup>-6</sup>; β3 = -0.488 [95 % CI: -0.760 to -0.217], p = 0.011). SMR analysis revealed significant associations between NPC1L1 expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue and cognitive outcomes (β1 = 0.020 [95 % CI: 0.003 to 0.037], p = 0.019; β2 = 0.026 [95 % CI: 0.009 to 0.043], p = 0.003; β3 = 0.054 [95 % CI: 0.009 to 0.099], p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings do not support dyslipidemia as a causal factor for cognitive impairment. However, NPC1L1 inhibition, as targeted by ezetimibe, may increase the risk of cognitive decline, independent of its lipid-lowering effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"120057"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mendelian randomization analysis of lipids traits and lipid-lowering drug-targets in relation to cognitive status.\",\"authors\":\"Jiajing Fu, Zhaoli Zhang, Yi Xu, Liuhu Han, Huimin Fan, Yao Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment is increasingly prevalent among older adults, posing a major public health challenge. While lipid-lowering medications are widely used to manage dyslipidemia in this population, the causal relationship between lipid levels and cognitive function remains unclear. This study investigates genetically- predicted lipid traits, lipid-lowering drug-targets, and their associations with cognitive status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genetic variants associated with lipid features or lipid-lowering drug-targets were identified using data from the GLGC. Cognitive summary statistics were obtained from six independent GWAS datasets. Significant drug-targets were further assessed using SMR and co-localization to account for potential confounding effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant associations were found between lipid traits or eight of the nine lipid-reducing drug-targets and cognitive outcomes. However, genetic inhibition of NPC1L1 was associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment across three distinct datasets (β1 = -0.191 [95 % CI: -0.307 to -0.075], p = 0.023; β2 = -0.288 [95 % CI: -0.394 to -0.182], p = 5.616 × 10<sup>-6</sup>; β3 = -0.488 [95 % CI: -0.760 to -0.217], p = 0.011). SMR analysis revealed significant associations between NPC1L1 expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue and cognitive outcomes (β1 = 0.020 [95 % CI: 0.003 to 0.037], p = 0.019; β2 = 0.026 [95 % CI: 0.009 to 0.043], p = 0.003; β3 = 0.054 [95 % CI: 0.009 to 0.099], p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings do not support dyslipidemia as a causal factor for cognitive impairment. However, NPC1L1 inhibition, as targeted by ezetimibe, may increase the risk of cognitive decline, independent of its lipid-lowering effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"120057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120057\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mendelian randomization analysis of lipids traits and lipid-lowering drug-targets in relation to cognitive status.
Background: Cognitive impairment is increasingly prevalent among older adults, posing a major public health challenge. While lipid-lowering medications are widely used to manage dyslipidemia in this population, the causal relationship between lipid levels and cognitive function remains unclear. This study investigates genetically- predicted lipid traits, lipid-lowering drug-targets, and their associations with cognitive status.
Methods: Genetic variants associated with lipid features or lipid-lowering drug-targets were identified using data from the GLGC. Cognitive summary statistics were obtained from six independent GWAS datasets. Significant drug-targets were further assessed using SMR and co-localization to account for potential confounding effects.
Results: No significant associations were found between lipid traits or eight of the nine lipid-reducing drug-targets and cognitive outcomes. However, genetic inhibition of NPC1L1 was associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment across three distinct datasets (β1 = -0.191 [95 % CI: -0.307 to -0.075], p = 0.023; β2 = -0.288 [95 % CI: -0.394 to -0.182], p = 5.616 × 10-6; β3 = -0.488 [95 % CI: -0.760 to -0.217], p = 0.011). SMR analysis revealed significant associations between NPC1L1 expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue and cognitive outcomes (β1 = 0.020 [95 % CI: 0.003 to 0.037], p = 0.019; β2 = 0.026 [95 % CI: 0.009 to 0.043], p = 0.003; β3 = 0.054 [95 % CI: 0.009 to 0.099], p = 0.019).
Conclusion: These findings do not support dyslipidemia as a causal factor for cognitive impairment. However, NPC1L1 inhibition, as targeted by ezetimibe, may increase the risk of cognitive decline, independent of its lipid-lowering effects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.