Chelsea Powell, Courtney Day, Vidit Sharma, Camille van Buskirk, Matthew A Warner, Elizabeth B Habermann, Matthew Houdek, Timucin Taner, Julie Heimbach, Cornelius Thiels
{"title":"大肿瘤切除术术中自体输血的肿瘤预后。","authors":"Chelsea Powell, Courtney Day, Vidit Sharma, Camille van Buskirk, Matthew A Warner, Elizabeth B Habermann, Matthew Houdek, Timucin Taner, Julie Heimbach, Cornelius Thiels","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18024-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative autologous blood transfusion (IABT) is contraindicated during oncologic resection owing to concern for metastasis. However, there is a paucity of data to substantiate this claim, and the true risk of IABT in patients with cancer remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We identified patients who underwent oncologic resection with IABT during 2010-2021 at our institution. The primary outcome was early metastasis. A subgroup analysis of patients who underwent liver transplants for malignancy was conducted using inverse probability of treatment weighting to compare survival between those who received autologous and allogeneic transfusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 444 patients, the most common diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (235, 52.9%), cholangiocarcinoma (68, 15.3%), and renal cell carcinoma (18, 4.1%). The median volume of autologous blood transfused was 661 mL (interquartile range (IQR) 337-1491 mL). A total of 7 patients (1.6%) experienced distant recurrence within 90 days, and 35 (7.9%) within 1 year. Of the seven patients with early distant recurrence, only one had metastasis not attributable to preoperative factors. In a subgroup analysis of patients undergoing liver transplant for malignancy, 299 patients who received IABT were compared with 107 patients who received allogeneic transfusion. After adjusting for cancer type, age, sex, estimated blood loss, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, stage, and allograft type, IABT was not associated with overall survival (OS) [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.30 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-2.03), p = 0.241] or recurrence-free survival (RFS) [AHR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77-1.73), p = 0.498].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IABT does not appear to be associated with early recurrence in patients undergoing oncologic resection. IABT should be investigated as a possible alternative to massive transfusion of allogeneic blood during oncologic resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"7644-7651"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncologic Outcomes of Intraoperative Autologous Blood Transfusion for Major Oncologic Resection.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Powell, Courtney Day, Vidit Sharma, Camille van Buskirk, Matthew A Warner, Elizabeth B Habermann, Matthew Houdek, Timucin Taner, Julie Heimbach, Cornelius Thiels\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-18024-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative autologous blood transfusion (IABT) is contraindicated during oncologic resection owing to concern for metastasis. However, there is a paucity of data to substantiate this claim, and the true risk of IABT in patients with cancer remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We identified patients who underwent oncologic resection with IABT during 2010-2021 at our institution. The primary outcome was early metastasis. A subgroup analysis of patients who underwent liver transplants for malignancy was conducted using inverse probability of treatment weighting to compare survival between those who received autologous and allogeneic transfusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 444 patients, the most common diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (235, 52.9%), cholangiocarcinoma (68, 15.3%), and renal cell carcinoma (18, 4.1%). The median volume of autologous blood transfused was 661 mL (interquartile range (IQR) 337-1491 mL). A total of 7 patients (1.6%) experienced distant recurrence within 90 days, and 35 (7.9%) within 1 year. Of the seven patients with early distant recurrence, only one had metastasis not attributable to preoperative factors. In a subgroup analysis of patients undergoing liver transplant for malignancy, 299 patients who received IABT were compared with 107 patients who received allogeneic transfusion. After adjusting for cancer type, age, sex, estimated blood loss, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, stage, and allograft type, IABT was not associated with overall survival (OS) [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.30 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-2.03), p = 0.241] or recurrence-free survival (RFS) [AHR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77-1.73), p = 0.498].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IABT does not appear to be associated with early recurrence in patients undergoing oncologic resection. IABT should be investigated as a possible alternative to massive transfusion of allogeneic blood during oncologic resection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7644-7651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18024-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18024-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:术中自体输血(IABT)在肿瘤切除术中是禁忌的,因为担心转移。然而,缺乏数据来证实这一说法,并且癌症患者使用IABT的真正风险仍然未知。患者和方法:我们确定了2010-2021年在我们机构接受IABT肿瘤切除术的患者。主要预后为早期转移。对因恶性肿瘤接受肝移植的患者进行亚组分析,使用治疗加权逆概率来比较接受自体和异体输血的患者的生存率。结果:444例患者中,最常见的诊断为肝细胞癌(235例,52.9%)、胆管癌(68例,15.3%)和肾细胞癌(18例,4.1%)。自体输血中位量为661 mL(四分位间距337 ~ 1491 mL)。90天内远处复发7例(1.6%),1年内复发35例(7.9%)。在7例早期远处复发的患者中,只有1例发生了非术前因素引起的转移。在一项针对恶性肝移植患者的亚组分析中,299例接受IABT的患者与107例接受同种异体输血的患者进行了比较。在校正癌症类型、年龄、性别、估计失血量、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、分期和同种异体移植物类型后,IABT与总生存期(OS)[校正风险比(AHR) 1.30(95%可信区间(CI) 0.82-2.03), p = 0.241]或无复发生存期(RFS) [AHR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77-1.73), p = 0.498]无关。结论:IABT似乎与肿瘤切除术患者的早期复发无关。应研究IABT作为肿瘤切除期间大量输血的可能替代方法。
Oncologic Outcomes of Intraoperative Autologous Blood Transfusion for Major Oncologic Resection.
Background: Intraoperative autologous blood transfusion (IABT) is contraindicated during oncologic resection owing to concern for metastasis. However, there is a paucity of data to substantiate this claim, and the true risk of IABT in patients with cancer remains unknown.
Patients and methods: We identified patients who underwent oncologic resection with IABT during 2010-2021 at our institution. The primary outcome was early metastasis. A subgroup analysis of patients who underwent liver transplants for malignancy was conducted using inverse probability of treatment weighting to compare survival between those who received autologous and allogeneic transfusions.
Results: Of 444 patients, the most common diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (235, 52.9%), cholangiocarcinoma (68, 15.3%), and renal cell carcinoma (18, 4.1%). The median volume of autologous blood transfused was 661 mL (interquartile range (IQR) 337-1491 mL). A total of 7 patients (1.6%) experienced distant recurrence within 90 days, and 35 (7.9%) within 1 year. Of the seven patients with early distant recurrence, only one had metastasis not attributable to preoperative factors. In a subgroup analysis of patients undergoing liver transplant for malignancy, 299 patients who received IABT were compared with 107 patients who received allogeneic transfusion. After adjusting for cancer type, age, sex, estimated blood loss, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, stage, and allograft type, IABT was not associated with overall survival (OS) [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.30 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-2.03), p = 0.241] or recurrence-free survival (RFS) [AHR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77-1.73), p = 0.498].
Conclusions: IABT does not appear to be associated with early recurrence in patients undergoing oncologic resection. IABT should be investigated as a possible alternative to massive transfusion of allogeneic blood during oncologic resection.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.