私人土地所有者在碳市场和联邦激励下的生物炭经济

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Parag Kadam, Puneet Dwivedi, Thomas W. Marrero
{"title":"私人土地所有者在碳市场和联邦激励下的生物炭经济","authors":"Parag Kadam,&nbsp;Puneet Dwivedi,&nbsp;Thomas W. Marrero","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Considering biochar's potential for carbon sequestration and healthy soils, this study evaluates the economic viability of biochar projects for private landowners in the southeastern United States. Our analysis incorporates biochar manufacturing (as a co-product) in existing paper mills, its transportation and application costs, along with federal incentives and carbon credit revenues (via carbon offset transactions with profit-sharing for landowners). Baseline economic analysis, with average parameters, found a modest net profit of approximately $242.5 per hectare (or about $12 per metric ton of biochar applied) for landowners. Economic simulations of 10000 scenarios incorporating randomized +/<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ - $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>20% variability in key parameters demonstrate that the highest costs arise from biochar manufacturing and transportation. At the same time, significant revenue sources include federal support and carbon market income. Sensitivity analysis reveals that net profit is most associated with manufacturing costs (correlation of −0.64), federal incentives (correlation of 0.68), carbon credit pricing (correlation of 0.32), and transportation costs (correlation of −0.1). Findings indicate that 95% of simulated scenarios yield positive profits for a hypothetical property of 1 ha, with 73.8% and 38.29% of the scenarios showing a net profit of more than $500 and $1000, respectively. On the other hand, the current average values of manufacturing costs, federal support, and carbon prices are very close to the limits when landowners do not make any profit. This emphasizes that lower manufacturing costs, more federal support, and higher carbon credit prices are essential for landowners' profitability. This study's insights into the economic dynamics of biochar can guide policymakers and other stakeholder groups, especially private landowners, in creating more resilient, profitable biochar markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biochar Economics for Private Landowners With Payments From Carbon Markets and Federal Incentives\",\"authors\":\"Parag Kadam,&nbsp;Puneet Dwivedi,&nbsp;Thomas W. Marrero\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Considering biochar's potential for carbon sequestration and healthy soils, this study evaluates the economic viability of biochar projects for private landowners in the southeastern United States. Our analysis incorporates biochar manufacturing (as a co-product) in existing paper mills, its transportation and application costs, along with federal incentives and carbon credit revenues (via carbon offset transactions with profit-sharing for landowners). Baseline economic analysis, with average parameters, found a modest net profit of approximately $242.5 per hectare (or about $12 per metric ton of biochar applied) for landowners. Economic simulations of 10000 scenarios incorporating randomized +/<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ - $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>20% variability in key parameters demonstrate that the highest costs arise from biochar manufacturing and transportation. At the same time, significant revenue sources include federal support and carbon market income. Sensitivity analysis reveals that net profit is most associated with manufacturing costs (correlation of −0.64), federal incentives (correlation of 0.68), carbon credit pricing (correlation of 0.32), and transportation costs (correlation of −0.1). Findings indicate that 95% of simulated scenarios yield positive profits for a hypothetical property of 1 ha, with 73.8% and 38.29% of the scenarios showing a net profit of more than $500 and $1000, respectively. On the other hand, the current average values of manufacturing costs, federal support, and carbon prices are very close to the limits when landowners do not make any profit. This emphasizes that lower manufacturing costs, more federal support, and higher carbon credit prices are essential for landowners' profitability. This study's insights into the economic dynamics of biochar can guide policymakers and other stakeholder groups, especially private landowners, in creating more resilient, profitable biochar markets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到生物炭在固碳和健康土壤方面的潜力,本研究评估了美国东南部私人土地所有者生物炭项目的经济可行性。我们的分析结合了现有造纸厂的生物炭生产(作为副产品)、运输和应用成本,以及联邦激励措施和碳信用收入(通过与土地所有者分享利润的碳抵消交易)。基于平均参数的基线经济分析发现,土地所有者的净利润为每公顷约242.5美元(或每公吨生物炭约12美元)。对10000种情况进行经济模拟,其中包括关键参数随机+/ - $$ - $$ 20%的变化,结果表明,生物炭的制造和运输成本最高。与此同时,重要的收入来源包括联邦政府的支持和碳市场收入。敏感性分析显示,净利润与制造成本(相关系数为- 0.64)、联邦激励(相关系数为0.68)、碳信用定价(相关系数为0.32)和运输成本(相关系数为- 0.1)最为相关。研究结果显示,以一公顷的物业为例,95%的模拟情景均可产生正利润,其中73.8%及38.29%的模拟情景净利润分别超过500元及1000元。另一方面,当土地所有者没有任何利润时,当前的制造成本、联邦支持和碳价格的平均值非常接近极限。这强调了更低的制造成本、更多的联邦支持和更高的碳信用价格对土地所有者的盈利能力至关重要。这项研究对生物炭经济动态的见解可以指导政策制定者和其他利益相关者群体,特别是私人土地所有者,创造更有弹性、更有利可图的生物炭市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biochar Economics for Private Landowners With Payments From Carbon Markets and Federal Incentives

Biochar Economics for Private Landowners With Payments From Carbon Markets and Federal Incentives

Considering biochar's potential for carbon sequestration and healthy soils, this study evaluates the economic viability of biochar projects for private landowners in the southeastern United States. Our analysis incorporates biochar manufacturing (as a co-product) in existing paper mills, its transportation and application costs, along with federal incentives and carbon credit revenues (via carbon offset transactions with profit-sharing for landowners). Baseline economic analysis, with average parameters, found a modest net profit of approximately $242.5 per hectare (or about $12 per metric ton of biochar applied) for landowners. Economic simulations of 10000 scenarios incorporating randomized +/ $$ - $$ 20% variability in key parameters demonstrate that the highest costs arise from biochar manufacturing and transportation. At the same time, significant revenue sources include federal support and carbon market income. Sensitivity analysis reveals that net profit is most associated with manufacturing costs (correlation of −0.64), federal incentives (correlation of 0.68), carbon credit pricing (correlation of 0.32), and transportation costs (correlation of −0.1). Findings indicate that 95% of simulated scenarios yield positive profits for a hypothetical property of 1 ha, with 73.8% and 38.29% of the scenarios showing a net profit of more than $500 and $1000, respectively. On the other hand, the current average values of manufacturing costs, federal support, and carbon prices are very close to the limits when landowners do not make any profit. This emphasizes that lower manufacturing costs, more federal support, and higher carbon credit prices are essential for landowners' profitability. This study's insights into the economic dynamics of biochar can guide policymakers and other stakeholder groups, especially private landowners, in creating more resilient, profitable biochar markets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信