{"title":"私人土地所有者在碳市场和联邦激励下的生物炭经济","authors":"Parag Kadam, Puneet Dwivedi, Thomas W. Marrero","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Considering biochar's potential for carbon sequestration and healthy soils, this study evaluates the economic viability of biochar projects for private landowners in the southeastern United States. Our analysis incorporates biochar manufacturing (as a co-product) in existing paper mills, its transportation and application costs, along with federal incentives and carbon credit revenues (via carbon offset transactions with profit-sharing for landowners). Baseline economic analysis, with average parameters, found a modest net profit of approximately $242.5 per hectare (or about $12 per metric ton of biochar applied) for landowners. Economic simulations of 10000 scenarios incorporating randomized +/<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ - $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>20% variability in key parameters demonstrate that the highest costs arise from biochar manufacturing and transportation. At the same time, significant revenue sources include federal support and carbon market income. Sensitivity analysis reveals that net profit is most associated with manufacturing costs (correlation of −0.64), federal incentives (correlation of 0.68), carbon credit pricing (correlation of 0.32), and transportation costs (correlation of −0.1). Findings indicate that 95% of simulated scenarios yield positive profits for a hypothetical property of 1 ha, with 73.8% and 38.29% of the scenarios showing a net profit of more than $500 and $1000, respectively. On the other hand, the current average values of manufacturing costs, federal support, and carbon prices are very close to the limits when landowners do not make any profit. This emphasizes that lower manufacturing costs, more federal support, and higher carbon credit prices are essential for landowners' profitability. This study's insights into the economic dynamics of biochar can guide policymakers and other stakeholder groups, especially private landowners, in creating more resilient, profitable biochar markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biochar Economics for Private Landowners With Payments From Carbon Markets and Federal Incentives\",\"authors\":\"Parag Kadam, Puneet Dwivedi, Thomas W. Marrero\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Considering biochar's potential for carbon sequestration and healthy soils, this study evaluates the economic viability of biochar projects for private landowners in the southeastern United States. Our analysis incorporates biochar manufacturing (as a co-product) in existing paper mills, its transportation and application costs, along with federal incentives and carbon credit revenues (via carbon offset transactions with profit-sharing for landowners). Baseline economic analysis, with average parameters, found a modest net profit of approximately $242.5 per hectare (or about $12 per metric ton of biochar applied) for landowners. Economic simulations of 10000 scenarios incorporating randomized +/<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ - $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>20% variability in key parameters demonstrate that the highest costs arise from biochar manufacturing and transportation. At the same time, significant revenue sources include federal support and carbon market income. Sensitivity analysis reveals that net profit is most associated with manufacturing costs (correlation of −0.64), federal incentives (correlation of 0.68), carbon credit pricing (correlation of 0.32), and transportation costs (correlation of −0.1). Findings indicate that 95% of simulated scenarios yield positive profits for a hypothetical property of 1 ha, with 73.8% and 38.29% of the scenarios showing a net profit of more than $500 and $1000, respectively. On the other hand, the current average values of manufacturing costs, federal support, and carbon prices are very close to the limits when landowners do not make any profit. This emphasizes that lower manufacturing costs, more federal support, and higher carbon credit prices are essential for landowners' profitability. This study's insights into the economic dynamics of biochar can guide policymakers and other stakeholder groups, especially private landowners, in creating more resilient, profitable biochar markets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biochar Economics for Private Landowners With Payments From Carbon Markets and Federal Incentives
Considering biochar's potential for carbon sequestration and healthy soils, this study evaluates the economic viability of biochar projects for private landowners in the southeastern United States. Our analysis incorporates biochar manufacturing (as a co-product) in existing paper mills, its transportation and application costs, along with federal incentives and carbon credit revenues (via carbon offset transactions with profit-sharing for landowners). Baseline economic analysis, with average parameters, found a modest net profit of approximately $242.5 per hectare (or about $12 per metric ton of biochar applied) for landowners. Economic simulations of 10000 scenarios incorporating randomized +/20% variability in key parameters demonstrate that the highest costs arise from biochar manufacturing and transportation. At the same time, significant revenue sources include federal support and carbon market income. Sensitivity analysis reveals that net profit is most associated with manufacturing costs (correlation of −0.64), federal incentives (correlation of 0.68), carbon credit pricing (correlation of 0.32), and transportation costs (correlation of −0.1). Findings indicate that 95% of simulated scenarios yield positive profits for a hypothetical property of 1 ha, with 73.8% and 38.29% of the scenarios showing a net profit of more than $500 and $1000, respectively. On the other hand, the current average values of manufacturing costs, federal support, and carbon prices are very close to the limits when landowners do not make any profit. This emphasizes that lower manufacturing costs, more federal support, and higher carbon credit prices are essential for landowners' profitability. This study's insights into the economic dynamics of biochar can guide policymakers and other stakeholder groups, especially private landowners, in creating more resilient, profitable biochar markets.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.