亲密伴侣暴力施暴者类型的长期治疗结果和再犯模式:一项15年随访研究

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Natalia Redondo, Román Ronzón-Tirado, Marina J. Muñoz-Rivas, Jose Luis Graña
{"title":"亲密伴侣暴力施暴者类型的长期治疗结果和再犯模式:一项15年随访研究","authors":"Natalia Redondo,&nbsp;Román Ronzón-Tirado,&nbsp;Marina J. Muñoz-Rivas,&nbsp;Jose Luis Graña","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current studies on intimate partner violence (IPV) conclude that IPV perpetrators are a heterogeneous group, with substantially different profiles and different relevant clinical variables, with a differential response to the psychological treatment programmes that they take part in, measured through criminal recidivism. However, most studies look only at these offenders' short-term recidivism. The aim of this longitudinal study was, on the one hand, to replicate a typology based on the risk of recidivism in a sample of 484 court-referred partner-violent men and, on the other hand, to analyse long-term criminal recidivism in these aggressors, depending on the typology found. For this purpose, a 15-year longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 484 court-referred partner-violent men after they had participated in a cognitive-behavioural psychological treatment programme. The results corroborated the existence of three subtypes of aggressors: those with high risk, medium risk and low risk, as well as different patterns of recidivism depending on the profile identified at the beginning of the treatment. It was concluded that recidivism was higher in the first year of follow-up, as well as the fact that the aggressors at greatest risk were the subgroup with the highest level of long-term recidivism. These results highlight the heterogeneity existing in this type of aggressor, as well as the need to adapt psychological treatment programmes in line with the initial characteristics of the participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70142","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Treatment Outcome and Recidivism Patterns Among Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrator Typology: A 15-Year Follow-Up Study\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Redondo,&nbsp;Román Ronzón-Tirado,&nbsp;Marina J. Muñoz-Rivas,&nbsp;Jose Luis Graña\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.70142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Current studies on intimate partner violence (IPV) conclude that IPV perpetrators are a heterogeneous group, with substantially different profiles and different relevant clinical variables, with a differential response to the psychological treatment programmes that they take part in, measured through criminal recidivism. However, most studies look only at these offenders' short-term recidivism. The aim of this longitudinal study was, on the one hand, to replicate a typology based on the risk of recidivism in a sample of 484 court-referred partner-violent men and, on the other hand, to analyse long-term criminal recidivism in these aggressors, depending on the typology found. For this purpose, a 15-year longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 484 court-referred partner-violent men after they had participated in a cognitive-behavioural psychological treatment programme. The results corroborated the existence of three subtypes of aggressors: those with high risk, medium risk and low risk, as well as different patterns of recidivism depending on the profile identified at the beginning of the treatment. It was concluded that recidivism was higher in the first year of follow-up, as well as the fact that the aggressors at greatest risk were the subgroup with the highest level of long-term recidivism. These results highlight the heterogeneity existing in this type of aggressor, as well as the need to adapt psychological treatment programmes in line with the initial characteristics of the participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70142\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70142\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前关于亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的研究得出结论,IPV施暴者是一个异质群体,具有本质上不同的特征和不同的相关临床变量,通过犯罪累犯来衡量,他们对参与的心理治疗方案的反应也不同。然而,大多数研究只关注这些罪犯的短期再犯。这项纵向研究的目的是,一方面,在484名法院推荐的伴侣暴力男性样本中复制基于再犯风险的类型,另一方面,根据所发现的类型,分析这些侵犯者的长期犯罪再犯。为此,研究人员对参加认知行为心理治疗项目的484名法院推荐的伴侣暴力男性进行了15年的纵向随访。结果证实了三种攻击者亚型的存在:高风险,中等风险和低风险,以及不同的再犯模式,这取决于治疗开始时确定的概况。结论是,在随访的第一年,再犯率更高,而且事实上,风险最大的攻击者是长期再犯率最高的亚组。这些结果强调了这类攻击者存在的异质性,以及根据参与者的初始特征调整心理治疗方案的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Long-Term Treatment Outcome and Recidivism Patterns Among Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrator Typology: A 15-Year Follow-Up Study

Long-Term Treatment Outcome and Recidivism Patterns Among Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrator Typology: A 15-Year Follow-Up Study

Current studies on intimate partner violence (IPV) conclude that IPV perpetrators are a heterogeneous group, with substantially different profiles and different relevant clinical variables, with a differential response to the psychological treatment programmes that they take part in, measured through criminal recidivism. However, most studies look only at these offenders' short-term recidivism. The aim of this longitudinal study was, on the one hand, to replicate a typology based on the risk of recidivism in a sample of 484 court-referred partner-violent men and, on the other hand, to analyse long-term criminal recidivism in these aggressors, depending on the typology found. For this purpose, a 15-year longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 484 court-referred partner-violent men after they had participated in a cognitive-behavioural psychological treatment programme. The results corroborated the existence of three subtypes of aggressors: those with high risk, medium risk and low risk, as well as different patterns of recidivism depending on the profile identified at the beginning of the treatment. It was concluded that recidivism was higher in the first year of follow-up, as well as the fact that the aggressors at greatest risk were the subgroup with the highest level of long-term recidivism. These results highlight the heterogeneity existing in this type of aggressor, as well as the need to adapt psychological treatment programmes in line with the initial characteristics of the participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信