加纳经济特区和坚定韧性:来自COVID-19冲击的证据

IF 1.4 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Charles Godfred Ackah, Nana Yaw Agyeman Owusu, Robert Darko Osei
{"title":"加纳经济特区和坚定韧性:来自COVID-19冲击的证据","authors":"Charles Godfred Ackah,&nbsp;Nana Yaw Agyeman Owusu,&nbsp;Robert Darko Osei","doi":"10.1111/dpr.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>The study assesses whether Ghana's Special Economic Zone (SEZ) policy improved firm resilience during COVID-19 and provides evidence to guide more adaptive industrial policies that can withstand future global shocks in emerging economies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study examines the resilience SEZ firms in Ghana during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on operational continuity, sales performance, and productivity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using firm-level panel data from 2018 to 2021, we employ a fixed effect estimation approach to compare SEZ and non-SEZ firms, assessing whether SEZs provided a buffer against economic shocks or exacerbated vulnerabilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>SEZ firms were more likely to suspend operations and remain closed for longer periods than non-SEZ firms, suggesting increased exposure to supply chain disruptions and declining export demand. Sales resilience was also weaker among SEZ firms, with a slower recovery trajectory than non-SEZ firms, indicating greater flexibility in market adaptation. Productivity analysis reveals no significant resilience advantage for SEZ firms, with pre-pandemic performance playing a stronger role in determining post-COVID outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The results challenge the assumption that SEZs inherently provide resilience to crises, highlighting the risks associated with rigid export dependencies and weak domestic supply chain integration. The study underscores the need for more adaptive SEZ policies that improve local market flexibility and strengthen industrial linkages to mitigate future economic shocks. These insights contribute to policy discussions on SEZ effectiveness in emerging economies during global disruptions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":"43 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special economic zones and firm resilience in Ghana: Evidence from the COVID-19 shock\",\"authors\":\"Charles Godfred Ackah,&nbsp;Nana Yaw Agyeman Owusu,&nbsp;Robert Darko Osei\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dpr.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Motivation</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study assesses whether Ghana's Special Economic Zone (SEZ) policy improved firm resilience during COVID-19 and provides evidence to guide more adaptive industrial policies that can withstand future global shocks in emerging economies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study examines the resilience SEZ firms in Ghana during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on operational continuity, sales performance, and productivity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Approach and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using firm-level panel data from 2018 to 2021, we employ a fixed effect estimation approach to compare SEZ and non-SEZ firms, assessing whether SEZs provided a buffer against economic shocks or exacerbated vulnerabilities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>SEZ firms were more likely to suspend operations and remain closed for longer periods than non-SEZ firms, suggesting increased exposure to supply chain disruptions and declining export demand. Sales resilience was also weaker among SEZ firms, with a slower recovery trajectory than non-SEZ firms, indicating greater flexibility in market adaptation. Productivity analysis reveals no significant resilience advantage for SEZ firms, with pre-pandemic performance playing a stronger role in determining post-COVID outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Policy Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results challenge the assumption that SEZs inherently provide resilience to crises, highlighting the risks associated with rigid export dependencies and weak domestic supply chain integration. The study underscores the need for more adaptive SEZ policies that improve local market flexibility and strengthen industrial linkages to mitigate future economic shocks. These insights contribute to policy discussions on SEZ effectiveness in emerging economies during global disruptions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.70037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了加纳经济特区政策是否提高了企业在2019冠状病毒病期间的抵御能力,并为指导更具适应性的产业政策提供了证据,以抵御新兴经济体未来的全球冲击。本研究考察了加纳经济特区企业在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的韧性,重点关注运营连续性、销售业绩和生产率。方法和方法利用2018年至2021年的企业层面面板数据,采用固定效应估计方法对经济特区和非经济特区的企业进行比较,评估经济特区是否为经济冲击提供了缓冲,还是加剧了脆弱性。与非经济特区的公司相比,经济特区的公司更有可能暂停运营并关闭更长时间,这表明供应链中断和出口需求下降的风险增加。经济特区企业的销售弹性也较弱,复苏轨迹比非经济特区企业慢,表明市场适应的灵活性更大。生产率分析显示,经济特区企业没有显著的韧性优势,大流行前的绩效在决定疫情后的结果方面发挥了更大的作用。研究结果挑战了经济特区本身具有抵御危机能力的假设,突出了与刚性出口依赖和国内供应链整合薄弱相关的风险。该研究强调,需要制定更具适应性的经济特区政策,提高当地市场的灵活性,加强产业联系,以减轻未来的经济冲击。这些见解有助于在全球经济动荡时期对新兴经济体经济特区有效性的政策讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special economic zones and firm resilience in Ghana: Evidence from the COVID-19 shock

Motivation

The study assesses whether Ghana's Special Economic Zone (SEZ) policy improved firm resilience during COVID-19 and provides evidence to guide more adaptive industrial policies that can withstand future global shocks in emerging economies.

Purpose

This study examines the resilience SEZ firms in Ghana during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on operational continuity, sales performance, and productivity.

Approach and Methods

Using firm-level panel data from 2018 to 2021, we employ a fixed effect estimation approach to compare SEZ and non-SEZ firms, assessing whether SEZs provided a buffer against economic shocks or exacerbated vulnerabilities.

Findings

SEZ firms were more likely to suspend operations and remain closed for longer periods than non-SEZ firms, suggesting increased exposure to supply chain disruptions and declining export demand. Sales resilience was also weaker among SEZ firms, with a slower recovery trajectory than non-SEZ firms, indicating greater flexibility in market adaptation. Productivity analysis reveals no significant resilience advantage for SEZ firms, with pre-pandemic performance playing a stronger role in determining post-COVID outcomes.

Policy Implications

The results challenge the assumption that SEZs inherently provide resilience to crises, highlighting the risks associated with rigid export dependencies and weak domestic supply chain integration. The study underscores the need for more adaptive SEZ policies that improve local market flexibility and strengthen industrial linkages to mitigate future economic shocks. These insights contribute to policy discussions on SEZ effectiveness in emerging economies during global disruptions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信