{"title":"山地农业生态系统玉米单作和豆科作物间作固碳试验评价","authors":"Muhammad Arshad","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evaluation of cropping systems with respect to climate change mitigation is a need of the hour to highlight the most advantageous practice for adoption. In current research, maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and legume intercropping has been assessed not only for biomass production, but also for its potential for carbon sequestration at various elevation sites. Research trials of maize-based sole and intercropping with mungbean (<i>Vigna radiata</i> L.), cowpea (<i>Vigna sinensis</i> S.), and soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) were performed at three elevations (1500, 1800, and 2200 m from mean sea level) with three replications in a randomized complete block Design during three consecutive years (2015–2017). Maize economic yield (MEY), maize biological yield (MBY), aboveground biomass yield (ABY), aboveground carbon sequestered (ACS), belowground carbon sequestered (BCS), total carbon sequestered (TCS), and total carbon equivalents (TCE) were computed from experimental plots of sole and intercropped maize and legumes and for cropping systems. Research results indicated significant (<i>p</i> = 0.001) individual effect of cropping system and two-way interaction effects of year and elevation on MEY, MBY, ABY, ACS, BCS, TCS, and TCE. Values of MEY (10.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and MBY (26.6 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) were significantly highest in case of sole cropping of maize, while values of ABY (47.3 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), ACS (23.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), BCS (7.97 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), TCS (31.6 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), and TCE (116.1 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) were significantly highest in case of intercropping system of maize and mung bean.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental assessment of carbon sequestration in sole and intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) with legumes in mountain agroecosystem\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Arshad\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Evaluation of cropping systems with respect to climate change mitigation is a need of the hour to highlight the most advantageous practice for adoption. In current research, maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and legume intercropping has been assessed not only for biomass production, but also for its potential for carbon sequestration at various elevation sites. Research trials of maize-based sole and intercropping with mungbean (<i>Vigna radiata</i> L.), cowpea (<i>Vigna sinensis</i> S.), and soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) were performed at three elevations (1500, 1800, and 2200 m from mean sea level) with three replications in a randomized complete block Design during three consecutive years (2015–2017). Maize economic yield (MEY), maize biological yield (MBY), aboveground biomass yield (ABY), aboveground carbon sequestered (ACS), belowground carbon sequestered (BCS), total carbon sequestered (TCS), and total carbon equivalents (TCE) were computed from experimental plots of sole and intercropped maize and legumes and for cropping systems. Research results indicated significant (<i>p</i> = 0.001) individual effect of cropping system and two-way interaction effects of year and elevation on MEY, MBY, ABY, ACS, BCS, TCS, and TCE. Values of MEY (10.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and MBY (26.6 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) were significantly highest in case of sole cropping of maize, while values of ABY (47.3 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), ACS (23.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), BCS (7.97 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), TCS (31.6 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), and TCE (116.1 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) were significantly highest in case of intercropping system of maize and mung bean.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70131\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
从减缓气候变化的角度对种植制度进行评估是当前的需要,以突出最有利的可采用做法。在目前的研究中,玉米(Zea mays L.)和豆类间作不仅评估了生物质生产,而且还评估了其在不同海拔地点的碳固存潜力。采用随机完全区组设计,连续3年(2015-2017)在3个海拔高度(距平均海平面1500、1800和2200 m)进行了以玉米为基础的单作和间作绿豆、豇豆和大豆的研究试验。计算了单作、间作玉米和豆科作物试验田和不同种植制度下玉米经济产量(MEY)、玉米生物产量(MBY)、地上生物量产量(ABY)、地上固碳量(ACS)、地下固碳量(BCS)、总固碳量(TCS)和总碳当量(TCE)。研究结果表明,种植制度的个体效应显著(p = 0.001),年高程对年产量、年比、ABY、ACS、BCS、TCS和TCE的双向交互作用显著(p = 0.001)。单作条件下,玉米亩产量(10.4 t ha - 1)和亩产量(26.6 t ha - 1)显著最高,而玉米-绿豆间作条件下,ABY (47.3 t ha - 1)、ACS (23.5 t ha - 1)、BCS (7.97 t ha - 1)、TCS (31.6 t ha - 1)和TCE (116.1 t ha - 1)显著最高。
Experimental assessment of carbon sequestration in sole and intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) with legumes in mountain agroecosystem
Evaluation of cropping systems with respect to climate change mitigation is a need of the hour to highlight the most advantageous practice for adoption. In current research, maize (Zea mays L.) and legume intercropping has been assessed not only for biomass production, but also for its potential for carbon sequestration at various elevation sites. Research trials of maize-based sole and intercropping with mungbean (Vigna radiata L.), cowpea (Vigna sinensis S.), and soybean (Glycine max L.) were performed at three elevations (1500, 1800, and 2200 m from mean sea level) with three replications in a randomized complete block Design during three consecutive years (2015–2017). Maize economic yield (MEY), maize biological yield (MBY), aboveground biomass yield (ABY), aboveground carbon sequestered (ACS), belowground carbon sequestered (BCS), total carbon sequestered (TCS), and total carbon equivalents (TCE) were computed from experimental plots of sole and intercropped maize and legumes and for cropping systems. Research results indicated significant (p = 0.001) individual effect of cropping system and two-way interaction effects of year and elevation on MEY, MBY, ABY, ACS, BCS, TCS, and TCE. Values of MEY (10.4 t ha−1) and MBY (26.6 t ha−1) were significantly highest in case of sole cropping of maize, while values of ABY (47.3 t ha−1), ACS (23.5 t ha−1), BCS (7.97 t ha−1), TCS (31.6 t ha−1), and TCE (116.1 t ha−1) were significantly highest in case of intercropping system of maize and mung bean.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.