Katrina Fenlon, Jessica Grimmer, Alia Reza, Travis Wagner
{"title":"牡蛎模型:理解社区在维持数字文化知识基础设施中的作用","authors":"Katrina Fenlon, Jessica Grimmer, Alia Reza, Travis Wagner","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09510-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digital community archives and many digital humanities projects serve as critical infrastructure for community-based cultural knowledge, but they struggle with sustainability. Prior work has illuminated numerous sustainability factors for digital cultural knowledge infrastructures that are developed and maintained by communities, but there is relatively little empirical work on the roles of communities themselves. Based on a comparative multi-case study of four projects, we offer a conceptual framework—the Oyster Model—for understanding community engagement as a sustainability factor in community-based, digital cultural knowledge infrastructures. Sustainable infrastructures identify and engage a range of stakeholder groups—teams, partners, contributors, users, and allies—in different roles and adapt to dynamism and change among these groups. This model characterizes reciprocity as a facet of community-centered approaches to sustainability, to refine understanding of the mutually beneficial relationship between digital knowledge infrastructures and the groups that create and maintain them. This work aims to bridge a gap between the community archives literature and relevant work on the sustainability of digital humanities scholarship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09510-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Oyster Model: understanding community roles in sustaining digital cultural knowledge infrastructures\",\"authors\":\"Katrina Fenlon, Jessica Grimmer, Alia Reza, Travis Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10502-025-09510-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Digital community archives and many digital humanities projects serve as critical infrastructure for community-based cultural knowledge, but they struggle with sustainability. Prior work has illuminated numerous sustainability factors for digital cultural knowledge infrastructures that are developed and maintained by communities, but there is relatively little empirical work on the roles of communities themselves. Based on a comparative multi-case study of four projects, we offer a conceptual framework—the Oyster Model—for understanding community engagement as a sustainability factor in community-based, digital cultural knowledge infrastructures. Sustainable infrastructures identify and engage a range of stakeholder groups—teams, partners, contributors, users, and allies—in different roles and adapt to dynamism and change among these groups. This model characterizes reciprocity as a facet of community-centered approaches to sustainability, to refine understanding of the mutually beneficial relationship between digital knowledge infrastructures and the groups that create and maintain them. This work aims to bridge a gap between the community archives literature and relevant work on the sustainability of digital humanities scholarship.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09510-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09510-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09510-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Oyster Model: understanding community roles in sustaining digital cultural knowledge infrastructures
Digital community archives and many digital humanities projects serve as critical infrastructure for community-based cultural knowledge, but they struggle with sustainability. Prior work has illuminated numerous sustainability factors for digital cultural knowledge infrastructures that are developed and maintained by communities, but there is relatively little empirical work on the roles of communities themselves. Based on a comparative multi-case study of four projects, we offer a conceptual framework—the Oyster Model—for understanding community engagement as a sustainability factor in community-based, digital cultural knowledge infrastructures. Sustainable infrastructures identify and engage a range of stakeholder groups—teams, partners, contributors, users, and allies—in different roles and adapt to dynamism and change among these groups. This model characterizes reciprocity as a facet of community-centered approaches to sustainability, to refine understanding of the mutually beneficial relationship between digital knowledge infrastructures and the groups that create and maintain them. This work aims to bridge a gap between the community archives literature and relevant work on the sustainability of digital humanities scholarship.
期刊介绍:
Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context