组织数字创新

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Peter Schrader , Joachim Heidelbach , Roman Ungern-Sternberg , Erwin Gross , Thomas Bauernhansl
{"title":"组织数字创新","authors":"Peter Schrader ,&nbsp;Joachim Heidelbach ,&nbsp;Roman Ungern-Sternberg ,&nbsp;Erwin Gross ,&nbsp;Thomas Bauernhansl","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital innovations reshape the competitive landscape for machinery and plant engineering companies, challenging established organizational structures to integrate digital and physical products, and increasingly calling for open-innovation collaborations that leverage external knowledge and ecosystems. This study examines the new requirements of digital innovations. Based on a qualitative coding approach analyzing 19 expert interviews, the research reveals a progression in organizational adaptation and provides criteria to help companies select the appropriate approach. Companies typically begin with reactive, short-term, ad hoc solutions before evolving toward integrated, proactive models. The optimal approach is dictated by influencing factors related to the company and the innovation idea, such as corporate strategy, risk tolerance, degree of digitization, resource availability, and alignment of innovation with core operations. The study contributes a systematic framework for selecting digital innovation strategies, providing practical guidance for aligning organizational structures with digital imperatives, and suggesting future longitudinal and cross-industry research directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 3","pages":"Article 100615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizing digital innovations\",\"authors\":\"Peter Schrader ,&nbsp;Joachim Heidelbach ,&nbsp;Roman Ungern-Sternberg ,&nbsp;Erwin Gross ,&nbsp;Thomas Bauernhansl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Digital innovations reshape the competitive landscape for machinery and plant engineering companies, challenging established organizational structures to integrate digital and physical products, and increasingly calling for open-innovation collaborations that leverage external knowledge and ecosystems. This study examines the new requirements of digital innovations. Based on a qualitative coding approach analyzing 19 expert interviews, the research reveals a progression in organizational adaptation and provides criteria to help companies select the appropriate approach. Companies typically begin with reactive, short-term, ad hoc solutions before evolving toward integrated, proactive models. The optimal approach is dictated by influencing factors related to the company and the innovation idea, such as corporate strategy, risk tolerance, degree of digitization, resource availability, and alignment of innovation with core operations. The study contributes a systematic framework for selecting digital innovation strategies, providing practical guidance for aligning organizational structures with digital imperatives, and suggesting future longitudinal and cross-industry research directions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125001507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125001507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字创新重塑了机械和设备工程公司的竞争格局,挑战了现有的组织结构,以整合数字和物理产品,并越来越多地要求利用外部知识和生态系统的开放式创新合作。本研究探讨数位创新的新要求。通过对19个专家访谈的定性编码方法分析,本研究揭示了组织适应的进展,并提供了帮助企业选择合适方法的标准。公司通常从反应性的、短期的、特别的解决方案开始,然后发展到集成的、主动的模型。最优方法取决于与公司和创新理念相关的影响因素,如公司战略、风险承受能力、数字化程度、资源可用性以及创新与核心业务的一致性。该研究为数字创新战略的选择提供了系统框架,为组织结构与数字需求的协调提供了实践指导,并为未来的纵向和跨行业研究方向提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizing digital innovations
Digital innovations reshape the competitive landscape for machinery and plant engineering companies, challenging established organizational structures to integrate digital and physical products, and increasingly calling for open-innovation collaborations that leverage external knowledge and ecosystems. This study examines the new requirements of digital innovations. Based on a qualitative coding approach analyzing 19 expert interviews, the research reveals a progression in organizational adaptation and provides criteria to help companies select the appropriate approach. Companies typically begin with reactive, short-term, ad hoc solutions before evolving toward integrated, proactive models. The optimal approach is dictated by influencing factors related to the company and the innovation idea, such as corporate strategy, risk tolerance, degree of digitization, resource availability, and alignment of innovation with core operations. The study contributes a systematic framework for selecting digital innovation strategies, providing practical guidance for aligning organizational structures with digital imperatives, and suggesting future longitudinal and cross-industry research directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信