在CSCL中,群体与Visual-GenAI学习分析反馈的互动与学生参与之间的关系

IF 10.5 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Xinghan Yin , Junmin Ye , Shuang Yu , Honghui Li , Qingtang Liu , Gang Zhao
{"title":"在CSCL中,群体与Visual-GenAI学习分析反馈的互动与学生参与之间的关系","authors":"Xinghan Yin ,&nbsp;Junmin Ye ,&nbsp;Shuang Yu ,&nbsp;Honghui Li ,&nbsp;Qingtang Liu ,&nbsp;Gang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Promoting student engagement has long been a vital subject in the research of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Previous research has indicated the potential of AI-based visual learning analytics feedback and generative AI (GenAI) feedback in this context. However, there is currently a lack of definitive research on the combined impact of these two types of intelligent feedback in CSCL. Additionally, limited attention has been paid to how groups utilize these tools in CSCL practice and the differences that may exist. In this study, we developed an Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback tool that integrates AI-based visual learning analytics feedback and GenAI-based feedback. We then evaluated the differences in groups' interactions with this Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback and its association with student engagement and academic performance. The study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of feedback interaction log data, content analysis of group discussion data, and qualitative analysis of students' perceptions of different feedback tools through surveys. Our results show that groups exhibit four distinct levels of feedback interaction behavior patterns with the Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback. These four patterns exhibit significant differences in behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, and academic performance. This study's significance lies in its potential contribution to future research on examining group behavior and optimizing learning using AI-based visual learning analytics feedback and GenAI-based feedback.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 105434"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between groups' interactions with the Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback and student engagement in CSCL\",\"authors\":\"Xinghan Yin ,&nbsp;Junmin Ye ,&nbsp;Shuang Yu ,&nbsp;Honghui Li ,&nbsp;Qingtang Liu ,&nbsp;Gang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Promoting student engagement has long been a vital subject in the research of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Previous research has indicated the potential of AI-based visual learning analytics feedback and generative AI (GenAI) feedback in this context. However, there is currently a lack of definitive research on the combined impact of these two types of intelligent feedback in CSCL. Additionally, limited attention has been paid to how groups utilize these tools in CSCL practice and the differences that may exist. In this study, we developed an Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback tool that integrates AI-based visual learning analytics feedback and GenAI-based feedback. We then evaluated the differences in groups' interactions with this Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback and its association with student engagement and academic performance. The study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of feedback interaction log data, content analysis of group discussion data, and qualitative analysis of students' perceptions of different feedback tools through surveys. Our results show that groups exhibit four distinct levels of feedback interaction behavior patterns with the Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback. These four patterns exhibit significant differences in behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, and academic performance. This study's significance lies in its potential contribution to future research on examining group behavior and optimizing learning using AI-based visual learning analytics feedback and GenAI-based feedback.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"239 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525002027\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525002027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

促进学生参与一直是计算机支持协同学习研究的一个重要课题。先前的研究表明,在这种情况下,基于人工智能的视觉学习分析反馈和生成式人工智能(GenAI)反馈具有潜力。然而,对于这两种智能反馈在CSCL中的综合影响,目前还缺乏明确的研究。此外,对于小组在CSCL实践中如何利用这些工具以及可能存在的差异,关注有限。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个visual - genai学习分析反馈工具,它集成了基于ai的视觉学习分析反馈和基于genai的反馈。然后,我们评估了小组与此Visual-GenAI学习分析反馈的互动差异及其与学生参与度和学习成绩的关联。本研究采用混合方法,结合反馈互动日志数据的定量分析、小组讨论数据的内容分析,以及通过调查对学生对不同反馈工具的认知进行定性分析。我们的研究结果表明,使用Visual-GenAI学习分析反馈,小组表现出四种不同层次的反馈交互行为模式。这四种模式在行为投入、情感投入、认知投入和学习成绩上表现出显著差异。这项研究的意义在于,它对未来使用基于人工智能的视觉学习分析反馈和基于genai的反馈来检查群体行为和优化学习的研究有潜在的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association between groups' interactions with the Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback and student engagement in CSCL
Promoting student engagement has long been a vital subject in the research of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Previous research has indicated the potential of AI-based visual learning analytics feedback and generative AI (GenAI) feedback in this context. However, there is currently a lack of definitive research on the combined impact of these two types of intelligent feedback in CSCL. Additionally, limited attention has been paid to how groups utilize these tools in CSCL practice and the differences that may exist. In this study, we developed an Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback tool that integrates AI-based visual learning analytics feedback and GenAI-based feedback. We then evaluated the differences in groups' interactions with this Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback and its association with student engagement and academic performance. The study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of feedback interaction log data, content analysis of group discussion data, and qualitative analysis of students' perceptions of different feedback tools through surveys. Our results show that groups exhibit four distinct levels of feedback interaction behavior patterns with the Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback. These four patterns exhibit significant differences in behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, and academic performance. This study's significance lies in its potential contribution to future research on examining group behavior and optimizing learning using AI-based visual learning analytics feedback and GenAI-based feedback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信